Beyond Glasgow Coma Scale: Prehospital prediction of traumatic brain injury

被引:0
|
作者
Schucht, Jessica E. [1 ]
Rakhit, Shayan [1 ,2 ]
Smith, Michael C. [1 ]
Han, Jin H. [2 ,3 ]
Brown, Joshua B. [4 ]
Grigorian, Areg [5 ]
Gondek, Stephen P. [1 ]
Smith, Jason W. [6 ]
Patel, Mayur B. [1 ,2 ]
Maiga, Amelia W. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Surg, Div Acute Care Surg, Sect Surg Sci,Med Ctr, 1211 21st Ave South, Suite 404, Med Arts Bldg, Nashville, TN 37235 USA
[2] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Emergency Med, Nashville, TN USA
[3] Tennessee Valley Healthcare Syst, Geriatr Res Educ & Clin Ctr, Nashville, TN USA
[4] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Surg, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[5] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Surg, Irvine, CA USA
[6] Univ Louisville, Dept Surg, Louisville, KY USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
MORTALITY; TRIAGE; SCORE;
D O I
10.1016/j.surg.2024.07.090
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Early identification of traumatic brain injury followed by timely, targeted treatment is essential. We aimed to establish the ability of prehospital Glasgow Coma Scale score alone and combined with vital signs to predict hospital-diagnosed traumatic brain injury. Methods: This study included adults from the 2017-2020 Trauma Quality Improvement Program data set with blunt mechanism. We calculated test characteristics of prehospital Glasgow Coma Scale score <12 alone and Glasgow Coma Scale score combined with heart rate and systolic blood pressure for predicting (1) any traumatic brain injury and (2) moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. Diagnostic performances were calculated in all patients and older adults (>55 years). We used decision curve analysis to determine the net diagnostic benefit of prehospital Glasgow Coma Scale score combined with heart rate + systolic blood pressure over Glasgow Coma Scale score alone. Results: Of 1,687,336 patients, 39.1% had any traumatic brain injury, 3.7% had moderate to severe traumatic brain injury, and 9.1% had a prehospital Glasgow Coma Scale score <12. Prehospital Glasgow Coma Scale score <12 alone had a sensitivity 83.1%, specificity 93.7%, negative predictive value 99.3%, and positive predictive value 33.7% for predicting moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. Adding pre- hospital heart rate <65/min and systolic blood pressure >150 mm Hg to Glasgow Coma Scale score <12 improved the positive predictive value for moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (55.3%), with a preserved negative predictive value of 96.4%. Decision curve analysis showed the traumatic brain injury prediction model including prehospital heart rate and systolic blood pressure had the greatest net benefit across most threshold probabilities. Conclusion: Less than a third of adult blunt trauma patients with a prehospital Glasgow Coma Scale score <12 have moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. Supplementing Glasgow Coma Scale score with prehospital vital signs improves diagnostic accuracy, potentially by filtering out patients with altered consciousness due to shock. Future work should better identify patients for traumatic brain injury-specific treatments in prehospital settings, including triage destination. (c) 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Glasgow coma scale in traumatic brain injury
    Heim, C
    Schoettker, R
    Spahn, DR
    ANAESTHESIST, 2004, 53 (12): : 1245 - 1255
  • [2] Prehospital Versus Trauma Center Glasgow Coma Scale in Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury Patients
    Drews, Joseph D.
    Shi, Junxin
    Papandria, Dominic
    Wheeler, Krista K.
    Sribnick, Eric A.
    Thakkar, Rajan K.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2019, 241 : 112 - 118
  • [3] Classification of a traumatic brain injury: the Glasgow Coma scale is not enough
    Chieregato, A.
    Martino, C.
    Pransani, V.
    Nori, G.
    Russo, E.
    Noto, A.
    Simini, B.
    ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2010, 54 (06) : 696 - 702
  • [4] Early Glasgow Coma Scale Score and Prediction of Traumatic Brain Injury: A Secondary Analysis of Three Harmonized Prehospital Randomized Clinical Trials
    Iyanna, Nidhi
    Donohue, Jack K.
    Lorence, John M.
    Guyette, Francis X.
    Gimbel, Elizabeth
    Brown, Joshua B.
    Daley, Brian J.
    Eastridge, Brian J.
    Miller, Richard S.
    Nirula, Raminder
    Harbrecht, Brian G.
    Claridge, Jeffrey A.
    Phelan, Herb A.
    Vercruysse, Gary A.
    O'Keefe, Terence
    Joseph, Bellal
    Shutter, Lori A.
    Sperry, Jason L.
    PREHOSPITAL EMERGENCY CARE, 2024,
  • [5] Pupil evaluation in addition to Glasgow Coma Scale components in prediction of traumatic brain injury and mortality
    Hoffmann, M.
    Lefering, R.
    Rueger, J. M.
    Kolb, J. P.
    Izbicki, J. R.
    Ruecker, A. H.
    Rupprecht, M.
    Lehmann, W.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2012, 99 : 122 - 130
  • [6] Critical score of Glasgow Coma Scale for pediatric traumatic brain injury
    Chung, Chia-Ying
    Chen, Chia-Ling
    Cheng, Pao-Tsai
    See, Lai-Chu
    Tang, Simon Fuk-Tan
    Wong, Alice May-Kuen
    PEDIATRIC NEUROLOGY, 2006, 34 (05) : 379 - 387
  • [7] Glasgow Coma Scale and quality of life after traumatic brain injury
    Costanti Settervall, Cristina Helena
    Cardoso de Sousa, Regina Marcia
    ACTA PAULISTA DE ENFERMAGEM, 2012, 25 (03) : 364 - 370
  • [8] Utility of Glasgow Coma Scale-Extended in symptom prediction following mild traumatic brain injury
    Drake, Angela I.
    McDonald, Eric C.
    Magnus, Nathalie E.
    Gray, Nicola
    Gottshall, Kim
    BRAIN INJURY, 2006, 20 (05) : 469 - 475
  • [9] A comparison of the Glasgow coma scale score to simplified alternative scores for the prediction of traumatic brain injury outcomes
    Gill, M
    Windemuth, R
    Steele, R
    Green, SM
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2005, 45 (01) : 37 - 42
  • [10] LIMITATIONS OF THE GLASGOW COMA SCALE IN PREDICTING OUTCOME IN CHILDREN WITH TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY
    LIEHLAI, MW
    THEODOROU, AA
    SARNAIK, AP
    MEERT, KL
    MOYLAN, PM
    CANADY, AI
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 1992, 120 (02): : 195 - 199