Evaluation of Gemcitabine and Carboplatin Dosing in Patients With Cisplatin-Ineligible Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma

被引:0
|
作者
Gamvroulas, Eleni [1 ]
Bailey, Erin [1 ]
Harrington, Erik [1 ]
Jones, Emma [1 ]
Martin, Rebecca [1 ]
Maughan, Benjamin L. [2 ]
机构
[1] Huntsman Canc Hosp, Dept Pharm, 1950 Circle Hope,Suite N2545, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[2] Huntsman Canc Hosp, Div Med Oncol, Salt Lake City, UT USA
关键词
Adverse events; Bladder cancer; Dose adjustments; Platinum agents; Toxicities; TRANSITIONAL-CELL CARCINOMA; CHEMOTHERAPY; CANCER;
D O I
10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102279
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The National Comprehensive Cancer Network Bladder Cancer Guidelines recommend carboplatin and gemcitabine first-line treatment in patients with cisplatin-ineligible, metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) - a Category 1 recommendation. For these patients, the median overall survival is 9.3 months. While carboplatin is purported to offer a more tolerable side-effect profile, many patients still require dose-reductions, dose-delays, and hospitalizations. Given the inability for mUC patients to tolerate this palliative regimen, we aim to determine whether initiating therapy with a lower dose regimen is justified. Methods: A single-institution retrospective analysis was conducted to review eligible patients treated with carboplatin plus gemcitabine from May 2014 through October 2022. Data collected via manual chart review included patient baseline characteristics, chemotherapy doses, reductions, delays, toxicities, and effectiveness. Results: Forty-three patients met inclusion cr iter ia. Nineteen patients (44%) required >= 1 dose reduction during therapy. Twenty-six patients (60%) started with a full-dose regimen, and 14 (54%) of those patients required a dose reduction during treatment. Seventeen patients (40%) started with a reduced-dose regimen, and 5 (29%) of those patients required a dose reduction during treatment. No patients received the anticipated 6 cycles at full dose, but 14% completed 6 cycles with dose reductions. One patient (2%) was able to tolerate > 80% relative dose intensity of both carboplatin and gemcitabine. Conclusions: Cisplatin-ineligible mUC patients were unable to tolerate full-dose carboplatin and gemcitabine. As this is a palliative regimen, it would be pertinent to consider starting therapy at a reduced dose to minimize treatment interruptions, dose omissions and side effects.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Vinflunine/gemcitabine versus carboplatin/gemcitabine as first-line treatment in cisplatin-ineligible patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma: A randomised phase II trial (VINGEM)
    Holmsten, Karin
    Jensen, Niels Viggo
    Mouritsen, Lene Sonne
    Jonsson, Erika
    Mellnert, Camilla
    Agerbaek, Mads
    Nilsson, Cecilia
    Moe, Mette
    Carus, Andreas
    Ofverholm, Elisabeth
    Lahdenpera, Outi
    Brandberg, Yvonne
    Johansson, Hemming
    Hellstrom, Mats
    von der Maase, Hans
    Pappot, Helle
    Ullen, Anders
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2020, 127 : 173 - 182
  • [2] A phase 2 trial of gemcitabine plus toripalimab for cisplatin-ineligible patients with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma
    Zou, Xiong
    Ding, Xi
    Feng, Zheng-Kai
    Ouyang, Yan-Feng
    Li, Hui-Feng
    Wen, Kai
    Wang, Zhi-Qiang
    Liu, You-Ping
    Liu, Yong-Long
    Zhang, Wei-Jing
    Yang, Qi
    Chen, Si-Yuan
    Xie, Yu-Long
    Xie, Ruo-Qi
    Lin, Chao
    Gu, Chen-Mei
    Huang, Pei-Yu
    Sun, Rui
    Hua, Yi-Jun
    You, Rui
    Chen, Ming-Yuan
    CELL REPORTS MEDICINE, 2024, 5 (10)
  • [3] Evaluation of provider preferences in first-line metastatic cisplatin-ineligible urothelial carcinoma in the setting of platinum shortages.
    Weinfeld, Michael Seth
    Chablani, Priyanka Vinod
    Reizine, Natalie Marie
    Stadler, Walter Michael
    Tawagi, Karine
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 42 (4_SUPPL)
  • [4] New option for cisplatin-ineligible urothelial cancer
    Dreicer, Robert
    LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2017, 18 (11): : 1428 - 1430
  • [5] Phase I/II study of ipilimumab plus nivolumab combined with sacituzumab govitecan in patients with metastatic cisplatin-ineligible urothelial carcinoma
    Jain, R. K.
    Chatwal, M.
    Chadha, J.
    Oschmann, E.
    Mizelle, S.
    Poehlman, T.
    Fan, W.
    Kim, Y.
    Dhillon, J.
    Wang, X.
    Zhang, J.
    Guevara, J-A.
    Sonpavde, G. P.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2024, 35 : S1141 - S1141
  • [6] Phase II California Cancer Consortium Trial of Gemcitabine-Eribulin Combination in Cisplatin-Ineligible Patients With Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: Final Report (NCI-9653)
    Sadeghi, Sarmad
    Groeshn, Susan G.
    Tsao-Wei, Denice D.
    Parikh, Rahul
    Mortazavi, Amir
    Dorff, Tanya B.
    Kefauver, Cheryl
    Hoimes, Christopher
    Doyle, Laurence
    Quinn, David, I
    Newman, Edward
    Lara, Primo N., Jr.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 37 (29) : 2682 - +
  • [7] Phase II randomized study of first line avelumab with carboplatin-gemcitabine versus carboplatin-gemcitabine alone in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma ineligible for cisplatin-based therapy.
    Vida, Alejo Rodriguez
    Mellado, Begona
    del Muro, Xavier Garcia
    Taus, Alvaro
    Barrera, Rafael Morales
    Maroto, Pablo
    Bonfill, Teresa
    Domenech, Montserrat
    Pinto, Alvaro
    Valderrama, Begona Perez
    Climent, Miguel A.
    Puente, Javier
    Perez-Gracia, Jose Luis
    Gonzalez-Billalabeitia, Enrique
    Vazquez, Federico
    Galtes, Susana
    Pons, Barbara
    Macia, Sonia
    Castellano, Daniel E.
    Bellmunt, Joaquim
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 36 (15)
  • [8] FDA Approval Summary: Enfortumab Vedotin plus Pembrolizumab for Cisplatin-Ineligible Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma
    Maguire, William F.
    Lee, Daniel
    Weinstock, Chana
    Gao, Xin
    Bulik, Catharine C.
    Agrawal, Sundeep
    Chang, Elaine
    Hamed, Salaheldin S.
    Bloomquist, Erik W.
    Tang, Shenghui
    Pazdur, Richard
    Kluetz, Paul G.
    Amiri-Kordestani, Laleh
    Suzman, Daniel L.
    CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2024, 30 (10) : 2011 - 2016
  • [9] Immune-checkpoint blockade in cisplatin-ineligible patients with urothelial cancer
    Faltas, Bishoy M.
    Tagawa, Scott T.
    LANCET, 2017, 389 (10064): : 6 - +
  • [10] Enfortumab vedotin for cisplatin-ineligible urothelial cancer Comment
    Pignot, Geraldine
    LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2021, 22 (06): : 748 - 749