Implant infection after prepectoral breast reconstruction treated with negative pressure wound therapy and photobiomodulation: a case report

被引:0
|
作者
Di Micco, Rosa [1 ]
Santurro, Letizia [1 ,2 ]
Zuber, Veronica [1 ]
Gasparri, Maria Luisa [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Cisternino, Giovanni [1 ]
Ludovica, Pitoni [1 ]
Ceccarino, Raffaele [1 ]
Rottino, Stefano Antonio [1 ]
Forma, Ornella [5 ]
Gentilini, Oreste D. [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] IRCCS Osped San Raffaele, Breast Surg Unit, Milan, Italy
[2] Human Gavazzeni, Breast Surg, Via Mauro Gavazzeni Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy
[3] Ctr Senol Svizzera Italiana, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Lugano, Switzerland
[4] Univ Italian Switzerland, Fac Biomed, Lugano, Switzerland
[5] IRCCS Osped San Raffaele, Wound Care Unit, Milan, Italy
[6] San Raffaele Vita Salute Univ, Milan, Italy
关键词
breast implant; ductal breast carcinoma; infection; mastectomy; negative pressure wound therapy; photobiomodulation; prepectoral breast reconstruction; wound; wound care; wound dressing; wound healing; VACUUM-ASSISTED CLOSURE; COMPLICATIONS; MANAGEMENT; SURGERY; SALVAGE; BIOMODULATION; METAANALYSIS; EFFICACY; DEVICE; REPAIR;
D O I
10.12968/jowc.2022.0097
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
Prepectoral breast reconstruction is a relatively new surgical technique that allows placement of the implant directly over the pectoralis major. It has benefits in terms of patient wellbeing, operative time, postoperative pain and recovery. However, in cases of infection, implant removal is often required and the patient is left with a flat chest. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first case of breast implant infection after breast reconstruction, successfully treated with a combination of both negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) and photobiomodulation (PBM). A 32-year-old female patient with a sparing mastectomy for in situ ductal breast carcinoma followed by a prepectoral reconstruction. On the left side, the patient presented with dehiscence of 2.5cm with implant exposure 90 days after surgery. After an initial conservative approach, the patient's condition worsened, and she developed a larger dehiscence and a red breast. She was treated with implant removal. PBM of the cavity and the application of VeraFlo Therapy (3M, US) with a polyurethane-foam filling in the residual cavity were adopted. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was isolated and appropriate antibiotic therapy was started. Every 48-72 hours, she returned to the operating room for a washout, PBM, 21 days of this approach and two consecutive negative swabs, the patient underwent breast reconstruction with a subpectoral expander. After six months, a definitive implant of the same size as the contralateral one was positioned. The cosmetic result was good and patient satisfaction was high. The combination of NPWT and PBM may represent a good solution in case of breast implant infection after prepectoral reconstruction with benefits in terms of surgical outcome, patient satisfaction and postoperative quality of life. Declaration of interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest.
引用
收藏
页码:180 / 186
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Reduces Wound Breakdown and Implant Loss in Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction
    Irwin, Gareth W.
    Boundouki, George
    Fakim, Bilal
    Johnson, Richard
    Highton, Lyndsey
    Myers, Dave
    Searle, Richard
    Murphy, John A.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2020, 8 (02)
  • [2] Comment on: "Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Reduces Wound Breakdown and Implant Loss in Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction"
    Olaiya, Oluwatobi R.
    Huynh, Minh
    McRae, Mark H.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2020, 8 (06)
  • [3] A New Method of Salvaging Breast Reconstruction After Breast Implant Using Negative Pressure Wound Therapy and Instillation
    Cheong, Ju Yong
    Goltsman, David
    Warrier, Sanjay
    AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2016, 40 (05) : 745 - 748
  • [4] A New Method of Salvaging Breast Reconstruction After Breast Implant Using Negative Pressure Wound Therapy and Instillation
    Ju Yong Cheong
    David Goltsman
    Sanjay Warrier
    Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 2016, 40 : 745 - 748
  • [5] Negative Pressure Wound Therapy with Instillation for Periprosthetic Infection after Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review
    O'Connor, Madeline J.
    Huffman, Kristin N.
    Ho, Kelly
    Marzouk, Sammer
    Fuentes, Rolando J. Casas
    Zhang, Kenneth L.
    Melnick, Bradley A.
    Sparks, Payton J.
    Harris, Raiven
    Bartler, Angelica V.
    Collinsworth, Ashley
    Griffin, Leah
    Galiano, Robert D.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2024, 12 (11)
  • [6] Reply: Innovative Management of Implant Infection and Exposure in ADM/Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction with Negative Pressure Wound Therapy
    Antonello Accurso
    Nicola Rocco
    Edi Mattera
    Francesco D’Andrea
    Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 2017, 41 : 1239 - 1240
  • [7] Reply: Innovative Management of Implant Infection and Exposure in ADM/Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction with Negative Pressure Wound Therapy
    Accurso, Antonello
    Rocco, Nicola
    Mattera, Edi
    D'Andrea, Francesco
    AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2017, 41 (05) : 1239 - 1240
  • [8] Use of negative pressure wound therapy to treat a cochlear implant infection around the auricle: a case report
    Fukushima, Seita
    Komune, Noritaka
    Kamizono, Kenichi
    Matsumoto, Nozomu
    Takaiwa, Kazutaka
    Nakagawa, Takashi
    Kadota, Hideki
    JOURNAL OF WOUND CARE, 2020, 29 (10) : 568 - 571
  • [9] Usefulness of Incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for Decreasing Wound Complication Rates and Seroma Formation Following Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction
    Ryu, Jeong Yeop
    Lee, Jung Ho
    Kim, Jong Seong
    Lee, Joon Seok
    Lee, Jeong Woo
    Choi, Kang Young
    Chung, Ho Yun
    Cho, Byung Chae
    Yang, Jung Dug
    AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2022, 46 (02) : 633 - 641
  • [10] Usefulness of Incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for Decreasing Wound Complication Rates and Seroma Formation Following Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction
    Jeong Yeop Ryu
    Jung Ho Lee
    Jong Seong Kim
    Joon Seok Lee
    Jeong Woo Lee
    Kang Young Choi
    Ho Yun Chung
    Byung Chae Cho
    Jung Dug Yang
    Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 2022, 46 : 633 - 641