The Effect of a Tailored Educational Flyer on Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Rural Residents: Lessons Learned from a Pilot Randomized Trial

被引:0
|
作者
Kim, Jungyoon [1 ]
Beseler, Cheryl [2 ]
Leypoldt, Melissa [3 ]
Subramanian, Roma [4 ]
Robinson, Tamara [5 ]
Funkenbusch, Karen [6 ]
Foster, Jason [7 ]
Harris, Susan [8 ]
Yoder, Aaron [2 ]
Hymel, Emma [9 ]
Watanabe-Galloway, Shinobu [9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nebraska Med Ctr, Coll Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Serv Res & Adm, Omaha, NE 68198 USA
[2] Univ Nebraska Med Ctr, Coll Publ Hlth, Dept Environm Agr & Occupat Hlth, Omaha, NE 68198 USA
[3] Nebraska Dept Hlth & Human Serv, Lincoln, NE 68508 USA
[4] Univ Nebraska Omaha, Coll Commun Fine Arts & Media, Omaha, NE 68182 USA
[5] Nebraska Canc Coalit, Lincoln, NE 68521 USA
[6] Univ Missouri Extens, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
[7] Univ Nebraska Med Ctr, Coll Med, Dept Surg, Omaha, NE 68198 USA
[8] Univ Nebraska Lincoln, Extens, Lincoln, NE 68583 USA
[9] Univ Nebraska Med Ctr, Coll Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Omaha, NE 68198 USA
关键词
colorectal cancer; FIT; screening; intervention; rural; education; small media;
D O I
10.3390/cancers16213645
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background/Objectives: Stool-based tests, such as the fecal immunochemical test (FIT), have been widely used for increasing colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Small media, such as printed materials or flyers, are known to be an effective intervention to increase CRC screening by fecal tests. However, more evidence is needed to determine whether such small media are effective in improving screening uptake of a mailed FIT intervention targeted at rural populations in the USA. Methods: In this randomized study, 1230 FIT kits were mailed from July to December 2022 to rural Nebraskans aged 45-74 who were not up to date on CRC screening. Half of the participants (n = 608) also received a tailored, one-page, gender-specific educational flyer created based on focus groups with rural residents. Logistic regression was used to determine predictors of returning the FIT. Results: Study participants were predominantly female (76%), non-Hispanic White (83%), and within the age group of 55-64 (43%). Overall, 192 (15.6%) kits were returned (16.1% from the flyer group; 15.1% from the no-flyer group). However, we found no significant differences between the flyer and no-flyer groups (Adjusted Odds Ratio [AOR]: 1.21; 95% CI: 0.88-1.66). Females (AOR: 1.78; 95% CI: 1.19-6.14) and the oldest (65-74) age group (AOR: 5.03; 95% CI: 2.78-8.47) were more likely to return FIT kits than males and the youngest (45-54) age group. Conclusions: A tailored educational flyer was not effective in improving the CRC-screening-rate-by-mailed-FIT approach for rural populations. Future research should explore the content, timing, and mode of delivery of educational interventions as well as other multi-component strategies to improve screening rates. Public health officials might also consider developing strategies targeted at males and younger (45-54) age groups.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Screening for Cancer: Lessons Learned from the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial
    Grubb, Robert L.
    Pinsky, Paul
    Prorok, Philip C.
    Andriole, Gerald L.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2015, 68 (04) : 545 - 546
  • [2] Colorectal cancer screening among rural Appalachian residents with multiple morbidities
    Tarasenko, Y. N.
    Schoenberg, N. E.
    RURAL AND REMOTE HEALTH, 2011, 11 (01):
  • [3] A randomized controlled trial of the impact of targeted and tailored interventions on colorectal cancer screening
    Myers, Ronald E.
    Sifri, Randa
    Hyslop, Terry
    Rosenthal, Michael
    Vernon, Sally W.
    Cocroft, James
    Wolf, Thomas
    Andrel, Jocelyn
    Wender, Richard
    CANCER, 2007, 110 (09) : 2083 - 2091
  • [4] A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Tailored Navigation and a Standard Intervention in Colorectal Cancer Screening
    Myers, Ronald E.
    Bittner-Fagan, Heather
    Daskalakis, Constantine
    Sifri, Randa
    Vernon, Sally W.
    Cocroft, James
    DiCarlo, Melissa
    Katurakes, Nora
    Andrel, Jocelyn
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2013, 22 (01) : 109 - 117
  • [5] A Randomized Trial of Generic Versus Tailored Interventions to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Intermediate Risk Siblings
    Manne, Sharon L.
    Coups, Elliot J.
    Markowitz, Arnold
    Meropol, Neal J.
    Haller, Daniel
    Jacobsen, Paul B.
    Jandorf, Lina
    Peterson, Susan K.
    Lesko, Samuel
    Pilipshen, Steven
    Winkel, Gary
    ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2009, 37 (02) : 207 - 217
  • [6] Improving Cancer Preventive Behaviors: A Randomized Trial of Tailored Lifestyle Feedback in Colorectal Cancer Screening
    Knudsen, Markus Dines
    Hjartaker, Anette
    Robb, Kathryn A.
    de lange, Thomas
    Hoff, Geir
    Berstad, Paula
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2018, 27 (12) : 1442 - 1449
  • [7] Lessons Learned From an Educational Pilot: High-Yield Physics Videos for Radiation Oncology Residents
    Peters, Gabrielle W.
    Atwood, Todd F.
    Brown, Derek
    Burmeister, Jay
    Ford, Eric
    Juang, Titania
    Lincoln, Holly
    Evans, Suzanne B.
    PRACTICAL RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2023, 13 (04) : E370 - E373
  • [8] Lessons learned from the CDC's Colorectal Cancer Screening Demonstration Program
    Seeff, Laura C.
    Rohan, Elizabeth A.
    CANCER, 2013, 119 : 2817 - 2819
  • [9] THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN RECEIPT OF COLORECTAL CANCER SCREENING AND KNOWLEDGE AMONG VULNERABLE RURAL RESIDENTS
    Bardach, S. H.
    Schoenberg, N. E.
    Fleming, S. T.
    Hatcher, J.
    GERONTOLOGIST, 2011, 51 : 284 - 284
  • [10] Colorectal cancer screening based on predicted risk: a pilot randomized controlled trial
    Plys, E.
    Bulliard, J-L
    Chaouch, A.
    Durand, M-A.
    van Duuren, L.
    Braendle, K.
    Auer, R.
    Froehlich, F.
    Lansdorp-Vogelaar, I.
    Corley, D.
    Selby, K.
    SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2024, 154 : 57S - 58S