Differentiating between obstructive and non-obstructive azoospermia: A machine learning-based approach

被引:0
|
作者
Haghpanah, Abdolreza [1 ]
Ayareh, Nazanin [2 ]
Akbarzadeh, Ashkan [2 ]
Irani, Dariush [1 ]
Hosseini, Fatemeh [2 ]
Moghadam, Farid Sabahi [3 ]
Gilani, Mohammad Ali Sadighi [4 ,5 ]
Shamohammadi, Iman [1 ]
机构
[1] Shiraz Univ Med Sci, Sch Med, Dept Urol, Shiraz, Iran
[2] Shiraz Univ Med Sci, Sch Med, Student Res Comm, Shiraz, Iran
[3] Azad Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Compute Engn, Mahshahr Branch, Shiraz, Iran
[4] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Shariati Hosp, Fac Med, Dept Urol, Tehran, Iran
[5] Royan Inst Reprod Biomed, Reprod Biomed Res Ctr, Dept Androl, Tehran, Iran
来源
BJUI COMPASS | 2025年 / 6卷 / 02期
关键词
azoospermia; machine learning; male infertility; obstructive; TESTICULAR BIOPSY; MANAGEMENT; CRYPTORCHIDISM; INFERTILITY; DIAGNOSIS; IMPACT; MEN;
D O I
10.1002/bco2.493
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BackgroundInfertility is a major global concern, with azoospermia, being the most severe form of male infertility. Distinguishing between obstructive azoospermia (OA) and non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) is crucial due to their differing treatment approaches. This study aimed to develop a machine learning model to predict azoospermia subtypes using clinical, ultrasonographic, semen and hormonal analysis data.MethodsThis retrospective study included all subjects diagnosed with azoospermia. All patients were evaluated by at least one urologist, had their semen sample assessed on at least two different occasions for diagnosis and underwent a testicular biopsy to determine the type of azoospermia, categorized into OA and NOA. Clinical factors, hormonal levels, semen parameters and testicular features were compared between the OA and NOA groups. Three machine learning models, including logistic regression, support vector machine and random forest, were evaluated for their accuracy in differentiating the two subtypes.ResultsThe study included a total of 427 patients with azoospermia, of which 326 had NOA and 101 had OA. The median age of the patients was 33.0 (IQR: 7.0) years. Our findings revealed that factors such as body mass index, testicular length, volume and longitudinal axis, semen parameters and hormonal levels differed significantly between the two groups. When these variables were input into the machine learning-based models, logistic regression achieved the highest F1-score and area under the curve value among the three models evaluated.ConclusionsThis study underscores the potential of machine learning to differentiate between azoospermia subtypes using readily available clinical data. However, further research is required to validate and refine the model before it can be applied clinically.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] DEEP LEARNING-BASED AUTOMATED SPERM IDENTIFICATION FOR NON-OBSTRUCTIVE AZOOSPERMIA PATIENTS
    Lee, Ryan
    Witherspoon, Luke
    Ma, Hongshen
    Flannigan, Ryan
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 206 : E672 - E673
  • [2] Challenges in differential diagnosis between obstructive and non-obstructive azoospermia
    Safar Gamidov
    Taras Shatylko
    Alikhan Tambiev
    Natig Gasanov
    Alina Popova
    Abdalrahman Alrawashdeh
    Gennadiy Sukhikh
    Uroprecision, 2024, 2 (01) : 30 - 35
  • [3] Secretory azoospermia or non-obstructive azoospermia?
    Rigot, J. M.
    FOLIA HISTOCHEMICA ET CYTOBIOLOGICA, 2009, 47 (05) : S51 - S53
  • [4] Identification and validation of diagnostic signature genes in non-obstructive azoospermia by machine learning
    Ran, Lingxiang
    Gao, Zhixiang
    Chen, Qiu
    Cui, Fengmei
    Liu, Xiaolong
    Xue, Boxin
    AGING-US, 2023, 15 (10): : 4465 - 4480
  • [6] The value of epididymal protease inhibitor in differential diagnosis between obstructive azoospermia and non-obstructive azoospermia
    Liu, B.
    Su, S.
    Wang, P.
    Niu, X.
    Yang, X.
    Zhang, W.
    Wang, Z.
    Wang, X.
    ANDROLOGIA, 2011, 43 (05) : 346 - 352
  • [7] Intracytoplasmic sperm injection in obstructive and non-obstructive azoospermia
    Mansour, RT
    Kamal, A
    Fahmy, I
    Tawab, N
    Serour, GI
    Aboulghar, MA
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1997, 12 (09) : 1974 - 1979
  • [8] Power Doppler ultrasonography in non-obstructive and obstructive azoospermia
    Souza, C. A. B.
    Fagundes, P. P.
    Cunha Filho, J. S.
    Freitas, F. M.
    Passos, E. P.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2003, 18 : 197 - 198
  • [9] COMPARISON OF ART OUTCOME BETWEEN NON-OBSTRUCTIVE AZOOSPERMIA AND OBSTRUCTIVE AZOOSPERMIA: 15 YEARS EXPERIENCES.
    Yoshida, A.
    Onodera, H.
    Sakakibara, K.
    Yamada, Y.
    Tanaka, M.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2014, 102 (03) : E68 - E69
  • [10] The Progress of Genetics for Non-obstructive Azoospermia
    Tu Chao-Feng
    Yuan Shi-Min
    Meng Lan-Lan
    Luo Ai-Xiang
    Tan Yue-Qiu
    PROGRESS IN BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOPHYSICS, 2017, 44 (06) : 466 - 476