Incidences and risk factors of postoperative urinary retention after mid-urethral sling placement with and without pelvic reconstructive surgery

被引:0
|
作者
Sun, Mou-Jong [1 ,2 ]
Sun, Ryan [3 ]
Chang, Yu-Jun [4 ]
Chen, Li-Ju [2 ]
Lim, Zhu Wei [1 ]
机构
[1] Changhua Christian Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Urogynecol & Reconstruct Pelv Surg, Changhua, Taiwan
[2] Changhua Christian Hosp, Ctr Urinary Incontinence & Voiding Dysfunct, Changhua, Taiwan
[3] Stanford Univ, Dept Urol, Stanford, CA USA
[4] Changhua Christian Hosp, Epidemiol & Biostat Ctr, Changhua, Taiwan
来源
关键词
Mid-urethral slings; Postoperative urinary retention; Pelvic reconstructive surgery; Stress urinary incontinence; VAGINAL TAPE; INCONTINENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.tjog.2024.12.007
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: Postoperative urinary retention (POUR) is a common consequence of urogynecologic surgery. In this study, we retrospectively assessed the rate of POUR and identified risk factors for the development of urinary retention after mid-urethral sling placement with and without pelvic reconstructive surgery. Materials and methods: Eight hundred and sixty-six women with urodynamic stress incontinence who underwent transobturator (TOT) and single-incision sling (SIS) placement, with or without a concomitant reconstructive procedure, were included in this study. Postoperative evaluations from the study were reviewed both subjectively and objectively, including voiding volume and bladder scan prior to discharge, cough stress test, uroflowmetry, changes in urodynamic parameters, and the Urogenital Distress Inventory six-item questionnaire at 3 months after surgery. Results: A total of 866 patients were included, of which 686 patients had no POUR (79.2 %), 158 had transient POUR (18.3 %), and 22 had prolonged POUR (2.5 %). No patients with prolonged POUR required a Foley catheter 2 weeks after discharge. Prior pelvic reconstruction surgery, concomitant hysterectomy, older age, and higher postvoid residual volume were associated with POUR (p < 0.05). Incidences of POUR were not significantly different between patients with and without concomitant pelvic reconstructive surgery. However, patients with SIS had a higher incidence of POUR than those with TOT (p < 0.05). Total objective cure rate of urodynamic stress incontinence was 91.7 %. Patients with prolonged POUR had a significantly lower cure rate, whereas those with transient POUR had the highest cure rate (p 1/4 0.013). Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that old age, previous hysterectomy, MUCP <30 cmH2O, and SIS were the risk factors for POUR. Conclusions: POUR was common after mid-urethral sling placement with or without pelvic reconstructive surgery; however, most cases were mild, transient and resolved spontaneously. Clinicians should be aware of the risk factors for POUR and strive for adequate prevention and management. (c) 2025 Taiwan Association of Obstetrics & Gynecology. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:287 / 292
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Sling mobilization in the management of urinary retention after mid-urethral sling surgery
    Moksnes, Liv Rimstad
    Svenningsen, Rune
    Schiotz, Hjalmar A.
    Moe, Kjartan
    Staff, Anne C.
    Kulseng-Hanssen, Sigurd
    NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2017, 36 (04) : 1091 - 1096
  • [2] VALSALVA VOIDERS ARE AT INCREASED RISK OF URINARY RETENTION AFTER MID-URETHRAL SLING PLACEMENT FOR STRESS URINARY INCONTINENCE
    O'Connor, R. Corey
    Pham, Khanh
    Topp, Nicole
    Koduri, Sumana
    Newcomer, Julianne
    Guralnick, Michael L.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 181 (04): : 562 - 562
  • [3] RISK OF INFECTION AFTER MID-URETHRAL SLING SURGERY: ARE POSTOPERATIVE ANTIBIOTICS NECESSARY?
    Swartz, Mia A.
    Ching, Christina B.
    Gill, Bradley C.
    Rackley, Raymond R.
    Trasavada, Sandip
    Goldman, Howard B.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 181 (04): : 162 - 162
  • [4] Urinary tract infection after mid-urethral sling: rates and risk factors
    Dallas, Kai
    Kuhlmann, Paige
    Masterson, John
    Reddy, Amit
    Tsai, Kyle
    Casteneda, Peris
    Ackerman, A. Lenore
    Eilber, Karyn
    Anger, Jennifer
    NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2020, 39 : S153 - S154
  • [5] Urinary retention is uncommon after colpocleisis with concomitant mid-urethral sling
    Shameem Abbasy
    Lior Lowenstein
    Thythy Pham
    Elizabeth R. Mueller
    Kimberly Kenton
    Linda Brubaker
    International Urogynecology Journal, 2009, 20 : 213 - 216
  • [6] Urinary retention is uncommon after colpocleisis with concomitant mid-urethral sling
    Abbasy, Shameem
    Lowenstein, Lior
    Pham, Thythy
    Mueller, Elizabeth R.
    Kenton, Kimberly
    Brubaker, Linda
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2009, 20 (02) : 213 - 216
  • [7] Outcomes of Mid-Urethral Sling for Urodynamic Stress Incontinence Following Extensive Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery
    Lo, Tsia-Shu
    Alzabedi, Aisha
    Jhang, Lan-Sin
    Hsieh, Wu-Chiao
    Kamarudin, Maherah
    Rellora, Louiza Erika
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2024, 35 (10) : 2045 - 2054
  • [8] RISK OF SURGICAL SITE INFECTION AFTER MID-URETHRAL SLING SURGERY: ARE POSTOPERATIVE ANTIBIOTICS NECESSARY?
    Swartz, M.
    Ching, C.
    Gill, B.
    Rackley, R.
    Vasavada, S.
    Goldman, H.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2009, 20 : S175 - S176
  • [9] A comprehensive look at risk factors for mid-urethral sling revision surgery
    Keslar, Melissa
    Margossian, Haroutyoun
    Katz, Justin E.
    Lakhi, Nisha
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2020, 31 (04) : 779 - 784
  • [10] A comprehensive look at risk factors for mid-urethral sling revision surgery
    Melissa Keslar
    Haroutyoun Margossian
    Justin E. Katz
    Nisha Lakhi
    International Urogynecology Journal, 2020, 31 : 779 - 784