Optimizing Amazon SageMaker Workloads with Predictive Compute Type Selection Strategies

被引:0
|
作者
Srivastava, Kavita [1 ]
Agarwal, Manisha [2 ]
机构
[1] Inst Informat Technol & Management, Delhi, India
[2] Banasthali Vidyapith, Tonk, Rajasthan, India
关键词
Resource Provisioning; AWS; Compute Types; Ensemble Methods; Support Vector Machines (SVM); XGBoost; AdaBoost;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-031-64064-3_10
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Effective resource provisioning is a critical aspect of optimizing cloud infrastructure, ensuring efficient resource allocation, and managing costs judiciously. One key element in this process is predicting the most suitable "Compute Type" for various workloads, as different types exhibit varying efficiencies in handling specific tasks. The precision in selecting the appropriate compute type not only leads to enhanced performance but also contributes to cost savings. AWS offers a broad range of compute types designed to satisfy various requirements about cost, scalability, and performance. Because these instances are suitable for specific use cases and workloads, choosing the right compute type is essential. Effective compute type selection is essential for managing costs and allocating resources as efficiently as possible. Precise forecasts lead to enhanced functionality, financial savings, and increased energy efficiency. In this paper, we have four kinds of compute types available in AWS - Accelerated Compute Types, Compute Optimized Instances, Memory Optimized Instances, and Standard Instances. We have proposed an automated approach for prediction of most appropriate compute types for specific workloads, reducing the manual configuration. In order to create the predictive model, we have used the Support Vector Machines (SVM) classifier and the ensemble methods. The SVM model balances F1-scores across classes and obtains an amazing overall accuracy of 84.49%. Conversely, AdaBoost performs worse, ranking 69.10% accurate and having comparatively lower F1-scores, particularly for "Memory Optimized Instances." With a remarkable accuracy of 99.42% and high F1-scores across all classes, XGBoost is particularly good at classifying 'Compute Type' using the features that are provided.
引用
收藏
页码:129 / 141
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Understanding and Optimizing GPU Cache Memory Performance for Compute Workloads
    Choo, Kyoshin
    Panlener, William
    Jang, Byunghyun
    2014 IEEE 13TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON PARALLEL AND DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING (ISPDC), 2014, : 189 - 196
  • [2] A Predictive Network-Based Immune Checkpoint Blockade Immunotherapeutic Signature Optimizing Patient Selection and Treatment Strategies
    Zhang, Nan
    Yang, Mei
    Yang, Jing-Min
    Zhang, Chu-Yu
    Guo, An-Yuan
    SMALL METHODS, 2024, 8 (10)
  • [3] Optimizing Predictive Models and Streamlining Feature Selection Process In Oncology
    Subrmanian, Kayalvizhi
    Faye, Ibrahima
    Thangarasu, Gunasekar
    Kannan, K. Nattar
    2024 IEEE 14TH SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER APPLICATIONS & INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, ISCAIE 2024, 2024, : 233 - 238
  • [4] Crop Selection Strategies of Squatters at Early Stage of Settlement in Lower Amazon
    Ishimaru, Kanae
    Kobayashi, Shigeo
    Yoshikawa, Sayaka
    4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SUSTAINABLE FUTURE FOR HUMAN SECURITY SUSTAIN 2013, 2014, 20 : 394 - 401
  • [5] Strategies for Optimizing the Diagnostic Predictive Value of Clostridium difficile Molecular Diagnostics
    Kociolek, Larry K.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2017, 55 (05) : 1244 - 1248
  • [6] Optimizing Cloud Costs with Machine Learning: Predictive Resource Scaling Strategies
    Ponnusamy, Sivakumar
    Khoje, Mandar
    2024 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INNOVATIVE TRENDS IN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, ICITIIT 2024, 2024,
  • [7] Optimizing selection strategies of genomic selection in swine breeding program based on a dataset simulated
    Tang, Guoqing
    Liu, Junfeng
    Xue, Jia
    Yang, Ruifei
    Liu, Tianfei
    Zeng, Zhiyao
    Jiang, Anan
    Jiang, Yanzhi
    Li, Mingzhou
    Zhu, Li
    Bai, Lin
    Shuai, Surong
    Wang, Zhiquan
    Li, Xuewei
    LIVESTOCK SCIENCE, 2014, 166 : 111 - 120
  • [8] Empirical Evaluations of Seed Set Selection Strategies for Predictive Coding
    Mahoney, Christian J.
    Huber-Fliflet, Nathaniel
    Jensen, Katie
    Zhao, Haozhen
    Neary, Robert
    Ye, Shi
    2018 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIG DATA (BIG DATA), 2018, : 3292 - 3301
  • [9] Optimizing NBA Player Selection Strategies Based on Salary and Statistics Analysis
    Nagarajan, Ramya
    Li, Lin
    2017 IEEE 15TH INTL CONF ON DEPENDABLE, AUTONOMIC AND SECURE COMPUTING, 15TH INTL CONF ON PERVASIVE INTELLIGENCE AND COMPUTING, 3RD INTL CONF ON BIG DATA INTELLIGENCE AND COMPUTING AND CYBER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY CONGRESS(DASC/PICOM/DATACOM/CYBERSCI, 2017, : 1076 - 1083
  • [10] Design and evaluation of alternative selection placement strategies in optimizing continuous queries
    Chen, JJ
    DeWitt, DJ
    Naughton, JF
    18TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DATA ENGINEERING, PROCEEDINGS, 2002, : 345 - 356