Platform Assessment - Challenges and Recommendations Regarding Automotive SPICE©

被引:0
|
作者
Richerzhagen, Martina [1 ]
Braunersreuther, Matthias [1 ]
Patrick, Groher [1 ]
Wegner, Thomas [1 ]
Steger, Bernhardt [2 ]
机构
[1] ZF Friedrichshafen AG, Friedrichshafen, Germany
[2] ISCN GesmbH, Graz, Austria
关键词
Platform Development; Automotive SPICE (R) Assessment; Project Management; Problem Resolution Management; System Requirements Analysis; System Integration and Integration Testing; Management of Products for Reuse;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-031-71139-8_28
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
With Automotive SPICE (R) PAM v4.0 [1], the assessment effort increases compared to the previous versions. In addition, many customers require more than one assessment per individual project v4.0 and each assessment is supposed to evaluate the entire product. This contradicts the approach of many automotive suppliers to develop diverse platforms and thus reduce the workload of individual development teams [12]. Based on the experience gained during more than 100 Automotive SPICE (R) assessments, intention is to present an approach to reunite the controversial points of view in a meaningful way. After defining the platforms where this approach is applicable, it will be used for selected processes to present practises that would have to be specifically considered by the assessor team in an Automotive SPICE (R) (in addition to the familiar VDA guidelines) on the part of a platform project and on the part of a customer (application) project to bring both sides back together.
引用
收藏
页码:413 / 428
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Experiences with the automotive SPICE for cybersecurity assessment model and tools
    Messnarz, Richard
    Ekert, Damjan
    Macher, Georg
    Much, Alexander
    Zehetner, Tobias
    Aschbacher, Laura
    JOURNAL OF SOFTWARE-EVOLUTION AND PROCESS, 2022, 35 (09)
  • [2] First Experiences with the Automotive SPICE for Cybersecurity Assessment Model
    Messnarz, Richard
    Norimatsu, So
    Dobaj, Juergen
    Ekert, Damjan
    Macher, Georg
    Zehetner, Tobias
    Aschbacher, Laura
    SYSTEMS, SOFTWARE AND SERVICES PROCESS IMPROVEMENT, EUROSPI 2021, 2021, 1442 : 531 - 547
  • [3] Automotive Data Management SPICE Assessment - Comparison of Process Assessment Models
    Portner, Lara
    Riel, Andreas
    Leclaire, Marcel
    Makkar, Samer Sameh
    SYSTEMS, SOFTWARE AND SERVICES PROCESS IMPROVEMENT, EUROSPI 2023, PT I, 2023, 1890 : 205 - 219
  • [4] A Study on Automotive SPICE® Assessment Indicators Correlation with Product Quality
    Mounir, Mourad
    Moselhy, Noha
    Badr, Khaled
    SYSTEMS, SOFTWARE AND SERVICES PROCESS IMPROVEMENT, EUROSPI 2024, PT I, 2024, 2179 : 363 - 373
  • [5] Hardware SPICE Extension for Automotive SPICE 3.1
    Schlager, Christian
    Messnarz, Richard
    Sporer, Harald
    Riess, Armin
    Mayer, Ralf
    Bernhardt, Steffen
    SYSTEMS, SOFTWARE AND SERVICES PROCESS IMPROVEMENT (EUROSPI 2018), 2018, 896 : 480 - 491
  • [6] Challenges regarding TVET training programs in the SA automotive industry
    Sibiya, Anthony Tolika
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TRAINING RESEARCH, 2024,
  • [7] Automotive SPICE Draft PAM V4.0 in Action: BETA Assessment
    Moselhy, Noha
    Adel, Ahmed
    Seddik, Ahmed
    SYSTEMS, SOFTWARE AND SERVICES PROCESS IMPROVEMENT, EUROSPI 2023, PT II, 2023, 1891 : 96 - 112
  • [8] Combining Agile Development and Software Product Lines in Automotive: Challenges and Recommendations
    Hohl, Philipp
    Stupperich, Michael
    Muench, Juergen
    Schneider, Kurt
    2018 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING, TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION (ICE/ITMC), 2018,
  • [9] An Interpretation and Implementation of Automotive Hardware SPICE
    Ivancic, Jaka
    Riel, Andreas
    Ekert, Damjan
    SYSTEMS, SOFTWARE AND SERVICES PROCESS IMPROVEMENT (EUROSPI 2020), 2020, 1251 : 684 - 695
  • [10] EVALUATING AUTOMOTIVE SPICE® AS PROCESS REQUIREMENTS
    Universität der Bundeswehr München, Germany
    INCOSE Int. Sym., 1 (2246-2269): : 2246 - 2269