Adaptive modeling of landslide susceptibility using Analytical Hierarchy Process and Multi-Objective Decision Optimization

被引:0
|
作者
Mao, Yimin [1 ]
Zhu, Licai [2 ]
Chen, Junde [3 ,4 ]
Nanehkaran, Yaser A. [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Shaoguan Univ, Sch Informat Sci & Engn, Shaoguan 512005, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Yancheng Teachers Univ, Sch Informat Engn, Yancheng 224002, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] Chapman Univ, Dale & Sarah Ann Fowler Sch Engn, Orange, CA 92866 USA
[4] Xiangtan Univ, Dept Elect Commerce, Xiangtan 411105, Hunan, Peoples R China
[5] Cankaya Univ, Fac Econ & Adm Sci, Dept Management Informat Syst, TR-06790 Ankara, Turkiye
关键词
Geo-hazards; Landslides; Susceptibility mapping; Provincial-level; MODO; ArcGIS; PROCESS AHP;
D O I
10.1016/j.asr.2024.12.061
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
This study develops a detailed landslide susceptibility map for Kermanshah province, Iran, by analyzing field surveys, historical data, and remote sensing. Fifteen key factors-such as geomorphology, geology, climate, seismicity, and human activities-were identified and ranked using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Multi-Objective Decision Optimization (MODO) within a GIS framework. The analysis classifies landslide risk into five categories: very high (18.4%), high (33.98%), moderate (24.19%), low (14.36%), and very low (9.07%). Pixel rate assessment confirmed the map's accuracy, showing that eastern and northeastern regions are particularly prone to landslides, with a substantial portion of the province at moderate to high risk. The study recommends using this map to guide targeted risk mitigation and land-use planning efforts to reduce landslide impacts on vulnerable areas. (c) 2024 COSPAR. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.
引用
收藏
页码:4536 / 4551
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Landslide susceptibility mapping using the analytical hierarchy process and GIS
    Semlali, I
    Ouadif, L.
    Bahi, L.
    CURRENT SCIENCE, 2019, 116 (05): : 773 - 779
  • [2] Multi-Objective Optimal DG Placement Approach Using Analytical Hierarchy Process
    Mewafy, Abdelrahman A. A.
    Kaddah, Sahar S. S.
    Eladawy, Mohamed
    ELECTRIC POWER COMPONENTS AND SYSTEMS, 2023, 51 (15) : 1648 - 1663
  • [3] Adaptive multi-agent decision making using analytical hierarchy process
    Chen, JN
    Huang, YM
    Chu, WC
    AL 2002: ADVANCES IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2002, 2557 : 203 - 212
  • [4] MULTI-OBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION FOR THE MICRO-MILLING PROCESS WITH ADAPTIVE DATA MODELING
    Liu, Xinyu
    Zhu, Weihang
    Zaloom, Victor
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING CONFERENCE 2011, VOL 2, 2011, : 365 - 372
  • [5] A Decision-Support Model for Additive Manufacturing Scheduling Using an Integrative Analytic Hierarchy Process and Multi-Objective Optimization
    Ransikarbum, Kasin
    Pitakaso, Rapeepan
    Kim, Namhun
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2020, 10 (15):
  • [6] Modeling and multi-objective optimization of a complex CHP process
    Seijo, Sandra
    del Campo, Ines
    Echanobe, Javier
    Garcia-Sedano, Javier
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2016, 161 : 309 - 319
  • [7] Modeling and Optimization of Rolling Process: A Multi-Objective Approach
    Panda, S.
    Panda, S. N.
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS, 2020, 19 (02) : 343 - 364
  • [8] Modeling and multi-objective optimization of forward osmosis process
    Kegl, Tina
    Korenak, Jasmina
    Buksek, Hermina
    Petrinic, Irena
    DESALINATION, 2024, 580
  • [9] Analytical Hierarchy Process based Multi-Objective Multiple Traveling Salesman Problem
    Cheikhrouhou, Omar
    Koubaa, Anis
    Zaard, Anis
    2016 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AUTONOMOUS ROBOT SYSTEMS AND COMPETITIONS (ICARSC 2016), 2016, : 130 - 136
  • [10] A multi-objective particle swarm optimization for the submission decision process
    Adewumi A.O.
    Popoola P.A.
    International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 2018, 9 (1) : 98 - 110