Driving factors for developing integrated farming: Multi-criteria decision-making analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Haldar, Avijit [1 ,2 ]
Maiti, Sanjit [1 ,3 ]
Goswami, Rupak [1 ,4 ]
Mandal, Satyendra Nath [1 ,5 ]
Shee, Arkaprabha [1 ,6 ]
Goswami, Biswajit [1 ,7 ]
Mahato, Dhiman [1 ,8 ]
Ghorai, Dipankar [1 ,9 ]
Pal, Kaushik [1 ,10 ]
Khan, Madhuchhanda [1 ,11 ]
Samanta, Malay Kumar [1 ,12 ]
Das, Manas Kumar [1 ,13 ]
Gupta, Moumita Dey [1 ,14 ]
Dey, Moutusi [1 ,15 ]
Barma, Pranab [1 ,16 ]
Chatterjee, Prasanta [1 ,17 ]
Mukherjee, Rahul Deb [1 ,18 ]
Roy, Rakesh [1 ,19 ]
Das, Srabani [1 ,20 ]
Ghosh, Swagat [1 ,21 ]
Das, Upama [1 ,2 ]
Roy, Kunal [1 ,5 ]
Das, Ayan [1 ,5 ]
Mukherjee, Samrat [1 ,22 ]
Roy, Subrata Kumar [1 ,2 ]
Dey, Pradip [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] ICAR Agr Technol Applicat Res Inst Kolkata, Kolkata 700097, W Bengal, India
[2] Indian Council Agr Res, ICAR Agr Technol Applicat Res Inst Kolkata, Kolkata, W Bengal, India
[3] ICAR Natl Dairy Res Inst, Karnal, Haryana, India
[4] Ramakrishna Mission Vivekananda Educ & Res Inst, Sch Agr & Rural Dev, Narendrapur Campus,South 24, Parganas 700103, W Bengal, India
[5] Kalyani Govt Engn Coll, Nadia, W Bengal, India
[6] Ramakrishna Mission Ashrama, Dhaanyaganga Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Sargachhi, W Bengal, India
[7] Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Dakshin Dinajpur Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Dakshin Dinajpur, W Bengal, India
[8] Ramananda Centenary Coll, Purulia, W Bengal, India
[9] ICAR Cent Res Inst Jute & Allied Fibres, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Bardhaman 713403, W Bengal, India
[10] West Bengal Univ Anim & Fishery Sci, North 24 Parganas Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Parganas 743223, W Bengal, India
[11] Visva Bharati, Palli Siksha Bhavana Inst Agr, Rathindra Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Birbhum, W Bengal, India
[12] Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Nadia Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Nadia, W Bengal, India
[13] West Bengal Univ Anim & Fishery Sci, Kolkata 700037, West Bengal, India
[14] West Bengal Comprehens Area Dev Corp, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Bankura 722207, W Bengal, India
[15] Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Dakshin Dinajpur Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Uttar Dinajpur, W Bengal, India
[16] Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Darjeeling Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Kalimpong, W Bengal, India
[17] Ramakrishna Ashram Krishi Vigyan Kendra, South 24 Parganas, Nimpith 743338, W Bengal, India
[18] Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Coochbehar Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Cooch Behar, W Bengal, India
[19] Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Malda Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Malda, W Bengal, India
[20] Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Reg Res Stn, Jhargram Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Jhargram 721507, W Bengal, India
[21] Ramakrishna Mission Vivekananda Educ & Res Inst, Sasya Shyamala Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Parganas, W Bengal, India
[22] Natl Bank Agr & Rural Dev, Kolkata, W Bengal, India
来源
关键词
Analytic hierarchy process (AHP); Driving factors; Integrated farming (IF); Limiting factors; SWOT analysis; West Bengal; SYSTEMS; PRODUCTIVITY;
D O I
10.56093/ijas.v94i3.148603
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Integrated farming (IF) by temporal and spatial mixing of crops, livestock, fishery, and allied activities in a single farm, is considered a critical multifunctional option for smallholder farmers, who form the backbone of Indian agriculture, to ensure sustainable livelihoods, the productivity of agricultural enterprises, stability of farm income, food and nutritional security. However, the adoption of IF still remains low. To explore the critical factors of IF systems and prioritize them for stakeholders' decision-making and development of strategies, the current research was undertaken to integrate SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats) - AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) analysis. We used a multi-stage sampling to select 60 practicing IF adopters in West Bengal state of eastern India for the collection of pair-wise comparison data on 32 SWOT factors using a close-ended questionnaire and subjected to AHP analysis to understand the quantitative importance of each factor of SWOT. Results of the multicriteria analysis showed the total priority weight of the opportunity component (0.450) was the highest, followed by strength (0.341), weakness (0.114), and threat components (0.095). Based on the global priority weight of all 32 SWOT factors, sustainable livelihood security" was the key driving factor (0.081) followed by promotion of organic farming (0.072), better risk management (0.063) and incorporation of high-value crops (0.063) of opportunity component. Increased farm production and productivity (0.058) and enhancement in income (0.055) of strength component also played as vital driving factors. There was no factor of weakness and threat components within the first 10 important factors. The insights of this study may help improve extension services to smallholder farmers for prioritizing strategies in the adoption process of IF. Additionally, it can also help policymakers to design targeted policies, remove barriers, foster innovation, and promote sustainable practices, contributing to food security and environmental sustainability.
引用
收藏
页码:49 / 55
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Multi-Criteria Decision-Making
    Encheva, Sylvia
    MICBE '09: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 10TH WSEAS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTERS IN BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS, 2009, : 192 - +
  • [2] Developing the Expert Decision-Making Algorithm Using the Methods of Multi-Criteria Analysis
    Basheleishvili, Irakli
    CYBERNETICS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES, 2020, 20 (02) : 22 - 29
  • [3] Integrated process capability and multi-criteria decision-making approach
    Cansu Dağsuyu
    Ulviye Polat
    Ali Kokangül
    Soft Computing, 2021, 25 : 7169 - 7180
  • [4] THE MOMENT INTEGRATED SOLUTION METHOD IN MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING
    Akan, Ercan
    Bayar, Sibel
    Elmas, Guldem
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING-THEORY APPLICATIONS AND PRACTICE, 2020, 27 (06): : 844 - 866
  • [5] Integrated process capability and multi-criteria decision-making approach
    Dagsuyu, Cansu
    Polat, Ulviye
    Kokangul, Ali
    SOFT COMPUTING, 2021, 25 (10) : 7169 - 7180
  • [6] A comparative analysis of multi-criteria decision-making methods
    Ceballos B.
    Lamata M.T.
    Pelta D.A.
    Progress in Artificial Intelligence, 2016, 5 (04) : 315 - 322
  • [7] Structure of multi-criteria decision-making
    Brugha, C
    JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2004, 55 (11) : 1156 - 1168
  • [8] Multiplicative multi-criteria analysis method for decision-making
    Zizovic, Miodrag M.
    Damljanovic, Nada
    Zizovic, Malisa R.
    MAEJO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 10 (02) : 233 - 241
  • [9] SUBJECTIVE MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING
    ESHRAGH, F
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MAN-MACHINE STUDIES, 1980, 13 (01): : 117 - 141
  • [10] An integrated multi-criteria decision-making methodology for conveyor system selection
    Jiamruangjarus, Pairat
    Naenna, Thanakorn
    COGENT ENGINEERING, 2016, 3 (01):