Comparing the Impacts of Different Risk Communication Policy Designs on Public Risk Perceptions: An Experiment in a Nuclear Power Plant Siting Scenario

被引：0

作者：

Zhou, Lei ^{[1
]}

Guo, Yue ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Int & Publ Affairs, Shanghai, Peoples R China

[2] Beijing Normal Univ, Sch Govt, 19 Xinjiekouwai St, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China

来源：

JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE POLICY ANALYSIS | 2025年

基金：

中国国家自然科学基金;

关键词：

comparative policy analysis; policy design; policy mix; risk communication; risk perception; nuclear power; LOCAL ACCEPTANCE; ENERGY; CHINA; ACCIDENT; RESIDENTS; DISASTER; ISSUES; TRUST;

D O I：

10.1080/13876988.2024.2442575

中图分类号：

C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];

学科分类号：

12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;

摘要：

Policy design of risk communication is crucial for informing the public about potential hazards. This study compares the impacts of different risk communication policy designs on public perceptions regarding the siting of a new nuclear power plant in China. Using a 2 x 2 factorial survey experiment, the behavioural effects of two policy goals (reinforcing benefits and allaying threats) and two policy instruments (science popularization and public engagement) were investigated. The results showed that science popularization is more effective in allaying threats, while public engagement is better at reinforcing benefits. These insights help inform goal-instrument coherence in risk communication policy design.

引用

页数：20

共 29 条

[1] Knowledge, risk, and policy support: Public perceptions of nuclear power
Stoutenborough, James W.
Sturgess, Shelbi G.
Vedlitz, Arnold
ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 62 : 176 - 184
[2] RISK-BENEFIT EVALUATION OF NUCLEAR-POWER PLANT SITING
不详
JADERNA ENERGIE, 1977, 23 (12): : 463 - 468
[3] RISK-BENEFIT EVALUATION OF NUCLEAR-POWER PLANT SITING
MIETTINEN, J
SAVOLAINEN, I
SILVENNOINEN, P
TORNIO, E
VUORI, S
ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, 1976, 3 (11-1) : 489 - 500
[4] Impact of Public Policy and Societal Risk Perception on US Civilian Nuclear Power Plant Construction
Taylor, Timothy R. B.
Ford, David N.
Reinschmidt, Kenneth F.
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2012, 138 (08) : 972 - 981
[5] Development of technical risk communication guideline in nuclear power plant (NPP)
Nunogane, N
Onoue, A
Kojima, S
Bley, D
Bowen, L
Wreathall, J
PSAM 5: PROBABILISTIC SAFETY ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1-4, 2000, (34): : 1839 - 1844
[6] Risk Perceptions of Resuming Nuclear Power Plant Operations After Fukushima: A Student Survey
Seo, Kami
Motoyoshi, Tadahiro
Maeda, Yasunobu
JOURNAL OF DISASTER RESEARCH, 2016, 11 (789-797) : 789 - 797
[7] Study on strategy of public risk communication in nuclear power field based on Markov process
Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing
100084, China
不详
100084, China
Yuanzineng Kexue Jishu, (455-460):
[8] Risk Communication on Radionuclide Contamination of Food after the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant Accident
Sekizawa, Jun
FOOD HYGIENE AND SAFETY SCIENCE, 2013, 54 (02): : 89 - 96
[9] PROBABILISTIC ASSESSMENT OF PUBLIC RISK DUE TO FUEL HANDLING IN A NUCLEAR-POWER PLANT
JACOBS, IM
MARRIOTT, PW
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 1974, 96 (04) : 71 - 72
[10] Climate change or nuclear power - No thanks! A quantitative study of public perceptions and risk framing in Britain
Pidgeon, Nick F.
Lorenzoni, Irene
Poortinga, Wouter
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2008, 18 (01): : 69 - 85

← 1 2 3 →