FAIRSTEPS study - Framework Addressing Inequities in pRimary care using STakEholder PerspectiveS: Integrative evidence review and Delphi consensus

被引:0
|
作者
Jackson, Ben
Mitchell, Caroline
Coster, Joanne
Lawy, Tom
Burton, Chris
Reynolds, Josephine
Essat, Munira
Cantrell, Anna
Clowes, Mark
Ariss, Steven
机构
关键词
Health inequalities; Primary care; Patient care; NEWLY ARRIVED REFUGEES; HEALTH-CARE; IMPROVING ACCESS; ADULTS; INTERVENTION; DISABILITIES; EXPERIENCES; LESSONS; PATIENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.puhe.2024.10.009
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objectives: Health inequities are unjust and avoidable differences in health outcomes across populations and between population groups. Though these arise predominantly from social determinants of health, healthcare is estimated to contribute around 20 % and primary healthcare reduces inequities in healthcare outcomes. As each provider works in their local context, we sought to provide an evidence-informed framework for designing, implementing, and evaluating local health inequity interventions in primary care. Study design: Mixed methods approach: an integrative evidence review, a multidisciplinary Delphi consensus study and collaborative patient and public participation. Methods: We searched published and grey literature for examples of primary care health inequity interventions. Our Delphi survey then asked primary care professionals how feasible and useful similar interventions would be in their local contexts. We incorporated an ongoing dialogue people with lived experience of health inequity in our design, implementation, and analysis. Results: Sixty-nine published papers and 19 grey literature papers were included. Interventions included multiple objectives (e.g., tailored provision, practitioner training) or focus (e.g., medical care, screening). Theory underpinning intervention design was rarely explicit but some specific tools and theory was identified for the framework. Practitioners and our patient group prioritised 28 example interventions to aid the design of local contextually sensitive interventions. Conclusions: We combined evidence synthesis, practitioner consultation and dialogue with people with lived experience produced an evidence-informed framework for the design, implementation and evaluation of local primary care health inequity interventions. The public and practitioner voice increases the credibility of our framework as a useful tool for service development.
引用
收藏
页码:307 / 315
页数:9
相关论文
共 9 条
  • [1] Development and consensus testing of quality indicators for geriatric pharmacotherapy in primary care using a modified Delphi study
    Sato, Noriko
    Fujita, Kenji
    Kushida, Kazuki
    Chen, Timothy F.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2022, 44 (02) : 517 - 538
  • [2] Development and consensus testing of quality indicators for geriatric pharmacotherapy in primary care using a modified Delphi study
    Noriko Sato
    Kenji Fujita
    Kazuki Kushida
    Timothy F. Chen
    International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, 2022, 44 : 517 - 538
  • [3] Primary care physicians’ attitudes to the adoption of electronic medical records: a systematic review and evidence synthesis using the clinical adoption framework
    Amy O’Donnell
    Eileen Kaner
    Caroline Shaw
    Catherine Haighton
    BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 18
  • [4] Primary care physicians' attitudes to the adoption of electronic medical records: a systematic review and evidence synthesis using the clinical adoption framework
    O'Donnell, Amy
    Kaner, Eileen
    Shaw, Caroline
    Haighton, Catherine
    BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2018, 18
  • [5] Using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to understand adherence to multiple evidence-based indicators in primary care: a qualitative study
    Lawton, Rebecca
    Heyhoe, Jane
    Louch, Gemma
    Ingleson, Emma
    Glidewell, Liz
    Willis, Thomas A.
    McEachan, Rosemary R. C.
    Foy, Robbie
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2016, 11
  • [6] Using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to understand adherence to multiple evidence-based indicators in primary care: a qualitative study
    Rebecca Lawton
    Jane Heyhoe
    Gemma Louch
    Emma Ingleson
    Liz Glidewell
    Thomas A. Willis
    Rosemary R. C. McEachan
    Robbie Foy
    Implementation Science, 11
  • [7] Physician-reported barriers to using evidence-based antibiotic prescription guidelines in primary care: protocol for a systematic review and synthesis of qualitative studies using the Theoretical Domains Framework
    Bursey, Krystal
    Hall, Amanda
    Pike, Andrea
    Etchegary, Holly
    Aubrey-Bassler, Kris
    Patey, Andrea M.
    Romme, Kristen
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (11):
  • [8] Integrating evidence-based practices for increasing cancer screenings in safety-net primary care systems: A multiple case study using the consolidated framework for implementation research
    Liang, Shuting
    Kegler, Michelle C.
    Cotter, Megan
    Phillips, Emily
    Hermstad, April
    Morton, Rentonia
    Beasley, Derrick
    Martinez, Jeremy
    Riehman, Kara
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2016, 11
  • [9] Global Evidence on the Sustainability of Telemedicine in Outpatientand Primary Care During the First2 Years of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Scoping Review Using the Nonadoption, Abandonment, Scale-Up, Spread, and Sustainability (NASSS) Framework
    Valdes, Daniela
    Shanker, Ankit
    Hijazi, Ghofran
    Mensah, Daniel Opoku
    Bockarie, Tahir
    Lazar, Ioana
    Ibrahim, Siti Aishah
    Zolfagharinia, Hamid
    Procter, Rob
    Spencer, Rachel
    Dale, Jeremy
    Paule, Armina
    Medlin, Liam Jonathon
    Kallottil, Keerthana Tharuvara
    INTERACTIVE JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2025, 14