Living on the edge: Detections and activity pattern of wildcats (Felis silvestris) and domestic cats (Felis catus) by camera trapping in areas of low wildcat population density

被引:0
|
作者
Gruber, Agnes [1 ,2 ]
Cserkesz, Tamas [3 ]
Kiss, Csaba [4 ]
Lanszki, Jozsef [5 ]
机构
[1] Orseg Natl Pk Directorate, Varosszer 57, H-9941 Oriszentpeter, Hungary
[2] Hungarian Univ Agr & Life Sci, Inst Anim Sci, Guba Sandor Str 40, H-7400 Kaposvar, Hungary
[3] Hungarian Nat Hist Museum, Dept Zool, Baross Str 13, H-1088 Budapest, Hungary
[4] Eszterharoly Catholic Univ, Eszterhazy sqr 1, H-3300 Eger, Hungary
[5] HUN REN Balaton Limnol Res Inst, Fish & Conservat Ecol Res Grp, Klebelsberg Kuno Str 3, H-8237 Tihany, Hungary
关键词
Attractant; Behavioural response; Diel activity pattern; Endangered species; Habitat conservation; Hybridization; EUROPEAN WILDCAT; HABITAT SELECTION; SCOTTISH WILDCAT; TROPHIC NICHE; HAIR-SNARES; SCHREBER; HYBRIDIZATION; SEASONALITY; HYBRIDS; REGION;
D O I
10.1016/j.applanim.2024.106472
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
The European wildcat (Felis silvestris) is one of the most endangered European mammal species and it is strictly protected in Hungary. Its population status was previously unknown in the western part of the country, in the region bordering Austria and Slovenia, which may be the peripheral distribution area of wildcats and where it is sympatric with the frequently occurring free-ranging domestic cats (Felis catus). We aimed to detect the presence of wildcats and domestic cats by camera trapping to determine the ratio of the two species and analyse the differences between their diel activity patterns in an area where wildcats were considered rare. We conducted the survey over 31 months, mainly in natural forests and surrounding areas, using camera traps and scent lures at 47 locations. We analysed data from 14,065 cumulative camera-trap days. The two species (and their suspected hybrids) were identified on the basis of their pelage characteristics. Wildcats were photographed at 55.3 % of the locations, and domestic cats at 46.8 %. The presence of both species overlapped at 42.3 % of wildcat locations. We identified 47 individuals with wildcat traits (including at least 20 hybrids) and 45 domestic cats. Wildcat abundance was low and varied significantly across areas. The mean number of unique detections per 100 cameratrap days was 0.77 for wildcats and 1.68 for domestic cats. Both species showed mainly nocturnal activity, with a significant difference in activity patterns observed only in spring. Their behavioural response to attractants differed; after scent-baiting, the detection frequency of wildcats increased slowly before decreasing again, while the domestic cat had a fast increase in the attractant effect at first, which gradually decreased. We could detect the presence of individuals with convincing wildcat phenotype outside their previously known range across large areas far from each other. We collected evidence of frequent invasive domestic cat occurrences inside wildcat habitats. Also, we recorded the activity patterns of the two species in their shared natural habitat with cameras. The knowledge gained from the research can be used to establish a conservation action plan for the wildcat and its habitat.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 25 条