Bereaved parent involvement in co-designed stillbirth research: Experiences of Project Engage

被引:0
|
作者
Tindal, Kirstin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Pollock, Danielle [4 ]
Farrant, Brad [5 ]
Robinson, Nicky [6 ]
Oba, Yumi [1 ]
Pade, Ashley [1 ]
Moore, Jassy [1 ]
Loughnan, Siobhan [1 ]
Flenady, Vicky [1 ]
Andrews, Christine [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Ctr Res Excellence Stillbirth, Mater Res, Brisbane, Australia
[2] Hudson Inst Med Res, Ritchie Ctr, Melbourne, Australia
[3] Monash Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Melbourne, Australia
[4] Univ Adelaide, Sch Publ Hlth, Hlth Evidence Synth Recommendat & Impact HESRI, Adelaide, Australia
[5] Univ Western Australia, Telethon Kids Inst, Nedlands, Australia
[6] Phoebe Joan Fdn Australia, Stanthorpe, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Co-design; Consumer engagement; Patient and public involvement; Bereaved parents; Stillbirth research; Perinatal loss;
D O I
10.1016/j.wombi.2024.101838
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background: While benefits of involving consumers in research are well established, bereaved parents face unique challenges, and descriptions of their experiences with co-designed stillbirth research are lacking. The collective experience of 'Project Engage' involved co-designing resources to support bereaved parents' involvement in research. Methods: This study aimed to describe and evaluate the involvement of bereaved parents as co-investigators of a stillbirth research project. Descriptive and exploratory methods were used to describe the process of Project Engage, between 2021 and 2023, in which bereaved parents were involved in all aspects. Evaluation was performed through iterative review and reflection to examine barriers and enablers of co-designed stillbirth research. Findings: The project team co-designed and published 'Getting Involved in Stillbirth Research: A guide for bereaved parents'. Seven co-investigators completed the end-of-phase project evaluation, including five bereaved parents and two researchers without lived experience of stillbirth. Most co-investigators felt that their contribution was highly valued and that project outputs matched their expectations. Enablers of co-design included clear communication, having a shared goal, a supportive team, relevant outputs, and lived-experience researchers on the team. Barriers included research jargon, meeting logistics, support and maintaining engagement, role expectations, and institutional governance processes. Conclusion: The co-design experience was perceived positively by both parents and researchers, with many key facilitators to the teams' success identified. Evaluation of the experiences of bereaved parents and researchers codesigning stillbirth research is vital. The process and recommendations outlined here will guide future best practice for bereaved parent involvement in stillbirth research.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Bridging the language gap: a co-designed quality improvement project to engage professional interpreters for women duing labour
    Yelland, Jane
    Biro, Mary Anne
    Dawson, Wendy
    Riggs, Elisha
    Vanpraag, Dannielle
    Wigg, Karen
    Antonopoulos, John
    Morgans, Jenny
    Szwarc, Jo
    East, Chris
    Brown, Stephanie
    AUSTRALIAN HEALTH REVIEW, 2017, 41 (05) : 499 - 504
  • [2] Exploring the experience and impact of Public and Patient Involvement in a co-designed stroke doctoral research programme
    Hall, P.
    McCartan, D.
    Fitzgerald, C.
    O'Callaghan, G.
    Lennon, O.
    Hickey, A.
    Sorensen, J.
    Kroll, T.
    Williams, D.
    Horgan, F.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STROKE, 2023, 18 (01) : 58 - 58
  • [3] Shifting power to people with disability in co-designed research
    Fraser-Barbour, Ellen
    Robinson, Sally
    Gendera, Sandra
    Burton-Clark, I.
    Fisher, Karen R.
    Alexander, June
    Howe, Kellie
    DISABILITY & SOCIETY, 2025, 40 (02) : 259 - 280
  • [4] Patient experiences of co-designed rehabilitation interventions: protocol for a rapid review
    McKercher, Jonathan P.
    Slade, Susan C.
    Jazayeri, Jalal
    Hodge, Anita
    Knight, Matthew
    Green, Janet
    Woods, Jeffrey
    Morris, Meg E.
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (01):
  • [5] Co-designed strategic planning and agile project management in academia: case study of an action research group
    Enric Senabre Hidalgo
    Mayo Fuster Morell
    Palgrave Communications, 5
  • [6] Co-designed strategic planning and agile project management in academia: case study of an action research group
    Hidalgo, Enric Senabre
    Fuster Morell, Mayo
    PALGRAVE COMMUNICATIONS, 2019, 5 (1)
  • [7] PARENT'S PRACTICAL TIPS: A CO-DESIGNED RESOURCE WRITTEN BY PARENTS FOR PARENTS
    Scott-Roberts, S.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 2019, 82 : 91 - 91
  • [8] Co-designed ecological research for more effective management and conservation
    Kurle, Carolyn M.
    Cadotte, Marc W.
    Jones, Holly P.
    Seminoff, Jeffrey A.
    Newton, Erika L.
    Seo, Minhyuk
    ECOLOGICAL SOLUTIONS AND EVIDENCE, 2022, 3 (01):
  • [9] Building belonging and connection for children with disability and their families: a co-designed research and community development project in a regional community
    Robinson, Sally
    Notara, Danielle
    COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT JOURNAL, 2015, 50 (04) : 724 - 741
  • [10] Patient Partner Perspectives: The Experience of Participating in a Co-Designed Virtual Reality Project
    Thomson, Heather
    Prospero, Lisa Di
    Xiao, Sarah
    Harth, Tamara
    Legere, Laurie
    Rashleigh, Laura
    Parzanese, Maria
    JOURNAL OF PATIENT EXPERIENCE, 2024, 11