A comprehensive review on applications of multi-criteria decision-making methods in healthcare waste management

被引:0
|
作者
Chakraborty, Santonab [1 ]
Raut, Rakesh D. [1 ]
Rofin, T. M. [1 ]
Chakraborty, Shankar [2 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Management, Dept Operat & Supply Chain Management, Mumbai, MH, India
[2] Jadavpur Univ, Dept Prod Engn, 188 SC Mullick Rd, Kolkata 700032, WB, India
关键词
Healthcare waste; literature review; MCDM; alternative; criteria; sustainable; ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS; MEDICAL WASTE; TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES; SELECTION; LOCATION; CRITERIA; ALTERNATIVES; HOSPITALS; FRAMEWORK; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1177/0734242X251320872
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Effective management of healthcare waste (HCW) imposes a great challenge to all countries. Specially in the developing countries, it is often mixed with municipal waste, adversely affecting the health and safety of the medical personnel, general public and environment. Healthcare waste management (HCWM) basically deals with segregation, collection and storage, routing and transportation, treatment and safe disposal of HCW, while obeying some national legislation. In every stage of HCWM, there are several alternative choices/strategies to be evaluated against a set of conflicting criteria. Numerous multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods have appeared to resolve the issue. This article reviews 101 articles available in Scopus and other scholarly databases on applications of MCDM techniques in solving HCWM problems. Those articles are classified into six groups: (a) selection of the most effective HCW treatment technology, (b) identification of the best HCW disposal site, (c) assessment of the best-performing healthcare unit adopting ideal HCWM strategies, (d) selection of third party logistics providers, (e) identification of HCWM barriers and (f) evaluation of specific HCWM plans. It is observed that the past researchers have mostly preferred to apply MCDM tools for solving HCW treatment technology selection problems, whereas analytic hierarchy process, decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory and best-worst method and fuzzy set theory have been the mostly favoured MCDM tool, criteria weight measurement techniques and uncertainty model, respectively. The outcomes of this article would help the healthcare personnel/policymakers in unveiling the current status of HCWM research, exploring extant research gaps and challenges and providing future directions leading to sustainable environment.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A review of multi-criteria decision-making methods for infrastructure management
    Kabir, Golam
    Sadiq, Rehan
    Tesfamariam, Solomon
    STRUCTURE AND INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING, 2014, 10 (09) : 1176 - 1210
  • [2] A Comprehensive Review of the Novel Weighting Methods for Multi-Criteria Decision-Making
    Ayan, Buesra
    Abacioglu, Seda
    Basilio, Marcio Pereira
    INFORMATION, 2023, 14 (05)
  • [3] On the application of multi-criteria decision-making methods in environmental pollution management: a comprehensive systematic review
    Safarzadeh, Soroush
    Jafari, Hamed
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2025,
  • [4] Stochastic multi-criteria decision-making: an overview to methods and applications
    Celik, Erkan
    Gul, Muhammet
    Yucesan, Melih
    Mete, Suleyman
    BENI-SUEF UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF BASIC AND APPLIED SCIENCES, 2019, 8 (01)
  • [5] Stochastic multi-criteria decision-making: an overview to methods and applications
    Erkan Celik
    Muhammet Gul
    Melih Yucesan
    Suleyman Mete
    Beni-Suef University Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 8
  • [6] MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING METHODS AND THEIR APPLICATIONS FOR HUMAN RESOURCES
    D'Urso, Maria Grazia
    Masi, Daniele
    ISPRS Workshop of Commission VI 1-3, Advances in Web-based Education Services, 2015, 46 (W1): : 31 - 37
  • [7] The use of multi-criteria decision-making methods in business analytics: A comprehensive literature review
    Yalcin, Ahmet Selcuk
    Kilic, Huseyin Selcuk
    Delen, Dursun
    TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2022, 174
  • [8] Multi-criteria Decision-making Methods for Sustainable Decision-making in the Mining Industry (A Comprehensive Study)
    Pouresmaieli, Mahdi
    Ataei, Mohammad
    Qarahasanlou, Ali Nouri
    Barabadi, Abbas
    JOURNAL OF MINING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 15 (02): : 683 - 706
  • [9] A review of multi-criteria decision-making methods for bioenergy systems
    Scott, James A.
    Ho, William
    Dey, Prasanta K.
    ENERGY, 2012, 42 (01) : 146 - 156
  • [10] Wastewater Treatment and Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods: A Review
    Sharma, Tina
    Kumar, Anuj
    Pant, Sangeeta
    Kotecha, Ketan
    IEEE ACCESS, 2023, 11 : 143704 - 143720