Advancing life cycle assessment of bioenergy crops with global land use models

被引:0
|
作者
Arvesen, Anders [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Humpenoeder, Florian [4 ]
Gutierrez, Tomas Navarrete [5 ]
Gibon, Thomas [5 ]
Baustert, Paul [5 ]
Dietrich, Jan Philipp [4 ]
Stadler, Konstantin [1 ,2 ]
Iordan, Cristina-Maria [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Luderer, Gunnar [4 ]
Popp, Alexander [4 ]
Cherubini, Francesco [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol NTNU, Ind Ecol Programme, Trondheim, Norway
[2] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol NTNU, Dept Energy & Proc Engn, Trondheim, Norway
[3] SINTEF Energy Res, Trondheim, Norway
[4] Potsdam Inst Climate Impact Res PIK, Potsdam, Germany
[5] Luxembourg Inst Sci & Technol LIST, Esch Sur Alzette, Luxembourg
[6] SINTEF Ocean, Trondheim, Norway
来源
关键词
life cycle assessment (LCA); land use and land use change (LULUC); integrated assessment model (IAM); climate change mitigation; sustainability assessment; second generation bioenergy; NEGATIVE EMISSIONS; MITIGATION; METHODOLOGY; INFORMATION; STRATEGIES; VEGETATION; SCENARIOS; FRAMEWORK; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.1088/2515-7620/ad97ac
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Bioenergy crops can cut greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, yet often bring hard-to-quantify environmental impacts. We present an approach for integrating global land use modeling into life cycle assessment (LCA) to estimate effects of bioenergy crops. The approach involves methodological choices connected to time horizons, scenarios of GHG prices and socioeconomic pathways, and flexible data transfer between models. Land-use change emissions are treated as totals, avoiding uncertain separation into direct and indirect emissions. The land use model MAgPIE is used to generate scenarios up to 2070 of land use, GHG emissions, irrigation and fertilizer use with different scales of perennial grass bioenergy crop deployment. We find that land use-related CO2 emission for bioenergy range from 2 to 35 tonne TJ-1, depending on bioenergy demand, policy context, year and accounting method. GHG emissions per unit of bioenergy do not increase with bioenergy demand in presence of an emission tax. With a GHG price of 40 or 200 $ tonne-1 CO2, GHG per bioenergy remain similar if the demand is doubled. A carbon tax thus has a stronger effect on emissions than bioenergy demand. These findings suggest that even a relatively moderate GHG price (40 $ tonne-1 CO2) can prevent significant emissions, highlighting the critical role governance plays in securing the climate benefits of bioenergy. However, realizing these benefits in practice will depend on a coherent policy framework for pricing CO2 emissions from land-use change, which is currently absent. Overall, our approach addresses direct and indirect effects associated with irrigation, machinery fuel and fertilizer use as well as emissions. Thanks to a global spatial coverage and temporal dimension, it facilitates a systematic and consistent inclusion of indirect effects in a global analysis framework. Future research can build on our open-source data/software to study different regions, bioenergy products or impacts.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Regionalization of land use impact models for life cycle assessment: Recommendations for their use on the global scale and their applicability to Brazil
    Raymundo Pavan, Ana Laura
    Ometto, Aldo Roberto
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2016, 60 : 148 - 155
  • [2] Spatial and life cycle assessment of bioenergy-driven land-use changes in Ireland
    Clarke, Robbie
    Sosa, Amanda
    Murphy, Fionnuala
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 664 : 262 - 275
  • [3] An integrated life cycle and water footprint assessment of nonfood crops based bioenergy production
    Jun Li
    Fengyin Xiong
    Zhuo Chen
    Scientific Reports, 11
  • [5] Life cycle assessment of different bioenergy production systems including perennial and annual crops
    Fazio, Simone
    Monti, Andrea
    BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2011, 35 (12): : 4868 - 4878
  • [6] Life Cycle Assessment of Land Use in Neighborhoods
    Trigaux, D.
    Allacker, K.
    De Troyer, F.
    SUSTAINABLE SYNERGIES FROM BUILDINGS TO THE URBAN SCALE, 2017, 38 : 595 - 602
  • [7] Bioenergy and global land-use change
    Rajcaniova, Miroslava
    Kancs, d'Artis
    Ciaian, Pavel
    APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2014, 46 (26) : 3163 - 3179
  • [8] Consensus, uncertainties and challenges for perennial bioenergy crops and land use
    Whitaker, Jeanette
    Field, John L.
    Bernacchi, Carl J.
    Cerri, Carlos E. P.
    Ceulemans, Reinhart
    Davies, Christian A.
    DeLucia, Evan H.
    Donnison, Iain S.
    McCalmont, Jon P.
    Paustian, Keith
    Rowe, Rebecca L.
    Smith, Pete
    Thornley, Patricia
    McNamara, Niall P.
    GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY, 2018, 10 (03): : 150 - 164
  • [9] Land Use in Life Cycle Assessment: Global Characterization Factors Based on Regional and Global Potential Species Extinction
    de Baan, Laura
    Mutel, Christopher L.
    Curran, Michael
    Hellweg, Stefanie
    Koellner, Thomas
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 47 (16) : 9281 - 9290
  • [10] Principles for life cycle inventories of land use on a global scale
    Thomas Koellner
    Laura de Baan
    Tabea Beck
    Miguel Brandão
    Barbara Civit
    Mark Goedkoop
    Manuele Margni
    Llorenç Milà i Canals
    Ruedi Müller-Wenk
    Bo Weidema
    Bastian Wittstock
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2013, 18 : 1203 - 1215