Multi-Center Benchmarking of a Commercially Available Artificial Intelligence Algorithm for Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Score Assignment and Lesion Detection in Prostate MRI

被引:0
|
作者
Oerther, Benedict [1 ]
Engel, Hannes [1 ]
Wilpert, Caroline [1 ]
Nedelcu, Andrea [1 ]
Sigle, August [2 ,3 ]
Grimm, Robert [4 ]
von Busch, Heinrich [5 ]
Schlett, Christopher L. [1 ]
Bamberg, Fabian [1 ]
Benndorf, Matthias [1 ,6 ,7 ]
Herrmann, Judith [8 ]
Nikolaou, Konstantin [8 ]
Amend, Bastian [9 ]
Bolenz, Christian [10 ]
Kloth, Christopher [11 ]
Beer, Meinrad [11 ]
Vogele, Daniel [11 ]
机构
[1] Univ Freiburg, Fac Med, Med Ctr, Dept Diag & Intervent Radiol, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany
[2] Univ Hosp Freiburg, Dept Urol, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany
[3] Univ Freiburg, Fac Med, Berta Ottenstein Programme, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany
[4] Siemens Healthineers AG, Res & Clin Translat, Magnet Resonance, D-91052 Erlangen, Germany
[5] Siemens Healthineers AG, Digital & Automat Innovat, D-91052 Erlangen, Germany
[6] Bielefeld Univ, Med Sch, Dept Diag & Intervent Radiol, D-32756 Detmold, Germany
[7] Bielefeld Univ, Univ Med Ctr OWL, Klinikum Lippe, D-32756 Detmold, Germany
[8] Univ Hosp Tuebingen, Dept Diag & Intervent Radiol, D-72076 Tubingen, Germany
[9] Univ Hosp Tuebingen, Dept Urol, D-72076 Tubingen, Germany
[10] Univ Hosp Ulm, Dept Urol & Pediat Urol, D-89081 Ulm, Germany
[11] Univ Hosp Ulm, Dept Diag & Intervent Radiol, D-89081 Ulm, Germany
关键词
prostate cancer; artificial intelligence; multiparametric MRI; PI-RADSv2.1; multi-center study;
D O I
10.3390/cancers17050815
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The increase in multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) examinations as a fundamental tool in prostate cancer (PCa) diagnostics raises the need for supportive computer-aided imaging analysis. Therefore, we evaluated the performance of a commercially available AI-based algorithm for prostate cancer detection and classification in a multi-center setting. Methods: Representative patients with 3T mpMRI between 2017 and 2022 at three different university hospitals were selected. Exams were read according to the PI-RADSv2.1 protocol and then assessed by an AI algorithm. Diagnostic accuracy for PCa of both human and AI readings were calculated using MR-guided ultrasound fusion biopsy as the gold standard. Results: Analysis of 91 patients resulted in 138 target lesions. Median patient age was 67 years (range: 49-82), median PSA at the time of the MRI exam was 8.4 ng/mL (range: 1.47-73.7). Sensitivity and specificity for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa, defined as ISUP >= 2) were 92%/64% for radiologists vs. 91%/57% for AI detection on patient level and 90%/70% vs. 81%/78% on lesion level, respectively (cut-off PI-RADS >= 4). Two cases of csPCa were missed by the AI on patient-level, resulting in a negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.88 at a cut-off of PI-RADS >= 3. Conclusions: AI-augmented lesion detection and scoring proved to be a robust tool in a multi-center setting with sensitivity comparable to the radiologists, even outperforming human reader specificity on both patient and lesion levels at a threshold of PI-RADS >= 3 and a threshold of PI-RADS >= 4 on lesion level. In anticipation of refinements of the algorithm and upon further validation, AI-detection could be implemented in the clinical workflow prior to human reading to exclude PCa, thereby drastically improving reading efficiency.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prospective evaluation of multiparametric MRI of prostate and the prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) version 2 for prostate cancer detection
    Lim, L. Y.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 26 : 22 - 23
  • [2] Association Between Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Score for the Index Lesion and Multifocal, Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer
    Stabile, Armando
    Dell'Oglio, Paolo
    De Cobelli, Francesco
    Esposito, Antonio
    Gandaglia, Giorgio
    Fossati, Nicola
    Brembilla, Giorgio
    Cristel, Giulia
    Cardone, Gianpiero
    Deho, Federico
    Losa, Andrea
    Suardi, Nazareno
    Gaboardi, Franco
    Del Maschio, Alessandro
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Briganti, Alberto
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2018, 1 (01): : 29 - 36
  • [3] Standardized Reporting of Prostate MRI: Comparison of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Version 1 and Version 2
    Tewes, Susanne
    Mokov, Nikolaj
    Hartung, Dagmar
    Schick, Volker
    Peters, Inga
    Schedl, Peter
    Pertschy, Stefanie
    Wacker, Frank
    Voshage, Goetz
    Hueper, Katja
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (09):
  • [4] The detection of significant prostate cancer is correlated with the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) in MRI/transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsy
    Hannes Cash
    Andreas Maxeiner
    Carsten Stephan
    Thomas Fischer
    Tahir Durmus
    Josephine Holzmann
    Patrick Asbach
    Matthias Haas
    Stefan Hinz
    Jörg Neymeyer
    Kurt Miller
    Karsten Günzel
    Carsten Kempkensteffen
    World Journal of Urology, 2016, 34 : 525 - 532
  • [5] The detection of significant prostate cancer is correlated with the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) in MRI/transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsy
    Cash, Hannes
    Maxeiner, Andreas
    Stephan, Carsten
    Fischer, Thomas
    Durmus, Tahir
    Holzmann, Josephine
    Asbach, Patrick
    Haas, Matthias
    Hinz, Stefan
    Neymeyer, Joerg
    Miller, Kurt
    Guenzel, Karsten
    Kempkensteffen, Carsten
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 34 (04) : 525 - 532
  • [6] PI-RADS Prostate Imaging - Reporting and Data System: 2015, Version 2
    Weinreb, Jeffrey C.
    Barentsz, Jelle O.
    Choyke, Peter L.
    Cornud, Francois
    Haider, Masoom A.
    Macura, Katarzyna J.
    Margolis, Daniel
    Schnall, Mitchell D.
    Shtern, Faina
    Tempany, Clare M.
    Thoeny, Harriet C.
    Verma, Sadna
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2016, 69 (01) : 16 - 40
  • [7] Accuracy of prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS v2) in the detection of prostate cancer (PCa).
    Gill, David Michael
    Bishoff, Jay
    Lynch, Steven C.
    Foy, Bridget
    Evans, Jaden D.
    Haslem, Derrick S.
    Yeatman, Timothy Joseph
    McLean, Logan
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 38 (15)
  • [8] EVALUATION OF PROSTATE IMAGING REPORTING AND DATA SYSTEM (PI-RADS) VERSION 2 FOR PROSTATE CANCER DETECTION: A RETROSPECTIVE SINGLE-CENTER STUDY
    Grbanovic, Lora
    Kovacevic, Lucija
    Kulis, Tomislav
    Kastelan, Zeljko
    Kralik, Marko
    Ivandic, Stjepan
    Prutki, Maja
    ACTA CLINICA CROATICA, 2024, 63 : 14 - 21
  • [9] Differentiation of prostatitis and prostate cancer using the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS)
    Meier-Schroers, Michael
    Kukuk, Guido
    Wolter, Karsten
    Decker, Georges
    Fischer, Stefan
    Marx, Christian
    Traeber, Frank
    Sprinkart, Alois Martin
    Block, Wolfgang
    Schild, Hans Heinz
    Willinek, Winfried
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2016, 85 (07) : 1304 - 1311
  • [10] Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS): Reflections on Early Experience With a Standardized Interpretation Scheme for Multiparametric Prostate MRI
    Westphalen, Antonio C.
    Rosenkrantz, Andrew B.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2014, 202 (01) : 121 - 123