Revision ACL reconstruction, but not bilateral ACL reconstruction, is associated with clinically relevant inferior subjective knee function compared with primary ACL reconstruction: A comparative analysis of 6831 patients

被引:0
|
作者
Cristiani, Riccardo [1 ,2 ]
Senorski, Eric Hamrin [3 ]
Helito, Camilo P. [4 ,5 ]
Samuelsson, Kristian [3 ]
Stalman, Anders [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Karolinska Inst, Dept Mol Med & Surg, Sect Sports Med, Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Stockholm Sports Trauma Res Ctr SSTRC, FIFA Med Ctr Excellence, Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Univ Gothenburg, Inst Clin Sci, Sahlgrenska Acad, Dept Orthopaed, Gothenburg, Sweden
[4] Univ Sao Paulo, Hosp Clin HCFMUSP, Grp Joelho, Inst Ortopedia & Traumatol,Fac Med, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[5] Hosp Sirio Libanes, Sao Paulo, Brazil
关键词
ACL; anterior cruciate ligament; bilateral ACL reconstruction; KOOS; revision ACL reconstruction; subjective knee outcome; CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; ANTERIOR; INJURY; GRAFT; OSTEOARTHRITIS; PREDICTORS; SURGERY; RUPTURE; RETURN;
D O I
10.1002/ksa.12496
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate and compare the subjective knee function in patients undergoing revision and bilateral anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) with those undergoing primary ACLR in a large cohort. Methods: Patients without concomitant ligament injuries who underwent primary, revision or bilateral ACLR at the Capio Artro Clinic, Stockholm, Sweden, between 2005 and 2018 were identified. The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) was collected preoperatively and at 1, 2 and 5 years postoperatively from the Swedish National Knee Ligament Registry. Patients who underwent revision and bilateral ACLR were compared with those who underwent primary ACLR (control group) using Student's t test. Results: A total of 6831 patients (6102 with primary ACLRs, 343 with revision ACLRs and 386 with bilateral ACLRs) were included. Preoperatively, there were significant but nonclinically relevant differences in favour of the revision ACLR group for KOOS Symptoms, Pain, Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and Sport/Rec subscale scores compared with the primary ACLR group. Postoperatively, except for the 1-year Symptoms and ADL subscales, the revision ACLR group reported significantly lower scores on all KOOS subscales than the primary ACLR group, with clinically relevant differences (>8-10 points) for the 1-, 2- and 5-year Sport/Rec and Quality of Life (QOL) subscales. The bilateral ACLR group reported significantly, but not clinically relevant, inferior scores on the 1-year Symptoms and QOL subscales and the 5-year Sport/Rec and QOL subscales compared with the primary ACLR group. Conclusions: Revision ACLR, but not bilateral ACLR, was associated with clinically relevant inferior subjective knee function compared with primary ACLR. It is important to counsel patients regarding their future subjective knee function after repeated ACLR. Compared to primary ACLR, inferior subjective results should be expected after revision ACLR, but not after bilateral ACLR. Level of Evidence: Level III.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of Improvement in Patient-Reported Knee Function After Revision and Multiple-Revision ACL Reconstruction Compared With Primary ACL Reconstruction
    Kaarre, Janina
    Herman, Zachary J.
    Grassi, Alberto
    Hamrin Senorski, Eric
    Musahl, Volker
    Samuelsson, Kristian
    ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2023, 11 (12)
  • [2] Comparisono of Knee Strength And Stability In Primary And Revision Acl Reconstruction
    Kim, Do Kyung
    Park, Geon
    Park, Won Hah
    MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2017, 49 (05): : 947 - 948
  • [3] Revision ACL Reconstruction in Adolescent Patients
    Rugg, Caitlin M.
    Pitcher, Austin A.
    Allen, Christina
    Pandya, Nirav K.
    ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2020, 8 (09)
  • [4] Relationships of Muscle Function and Subjective Knee Function in Patients After ACL Reconstruction
    Bodkin, Stephan
    Goetschius, John
    Hertel, Jay
    Hart, Joe
    ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2017, 5 (07):
  • [5] Difference of Knee Strength Recovery Between Revision and Primary ACL Reconstruction
    Dauty, Marc
    Combes, Philippe
    Gernigon, Marie
    Menu, Pierre
    Crenn, Vincent
    Daley, Pauline
    Fouasson-Chailloux, Alban
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2024, 45 (05) : 390 - 398
  • [6] Association of Remaining Anterior Knee Laxity With Inferior Outcomes After Revision ACL Reconstruction
    Eggeling, Lena
    Drenck, Tobias Claus
    Breer, Stephan
    Frosch, Karl-Heinz
    Akoto, Ralph
    ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2024, 12 (02)
  • [7] Double bundle ACL reconstruction leads to better restoration of knee laxity and subjective outcomes than single bundle ACL reconstruction
    Seppanen, Arttu
    Suomalainen, Piia
    Huhtala, Heini
    Maenpaa, Heikki
    Kiekara, Tommi
    Jarvela, Timo
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2022, 30 (05) : 1795 - 1808
  • [8] ACL reconstruction combined with anterolateral structures reconstruction for treating ACL rupture and knee injuries: a finite element analysis
    Wang, Huizhi
    Yao, Gai
    He, Kaixin
    Wang, Zimin
    Cheng, Cheng-Kung
    FRONTIERS IN BIOENGINEERING AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2024, 12
  • [9] Double bundle ACL reconstruction leads to better restoration of knee laxity and subjective outcomes than single bundle ACL reconstruction
    Arttu Seppänen
    Piia Suomalainen
    Heini Huhtala
    Heikki Mäenpää
    Tommi Kiekara
    Timo Järvelä
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2022, 30 : 1795 - 1808
  • [10] ACL reconstruction demonstrates better stability compared to ACL repair for patients with Schenck III and IV knee dislocations
    Fahlbusch, Hendrik
    Behrendt, Peter
    Frings, Jannik
    Berninger, Markus T.
    Korthaus, Alexander
    Akoto, Ralph
    Frosch, Karl-Heinz
    Krause, Matthias
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2024, 144 (09) : 4325 - 4331