Comparative results of percutaneous and open surgery for trigger fingers: a propensity score analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Chanthanapodi, Praphan [1 ]
Aodsup, Sasithorn [1 ]
机构
[1] Somdejphrajaotaksin Maharaj Hosp, Orthopaed Dept, Tak, Thailand
来源
FRONTIERS IN SURGERY | 2025年 / 12卷
关键词
trigger finger; percutaneous release; open release; nerve injury; recurrence; propensity score; A1 PULLEY RELEASE; SAFE;
D O I
10.3389/fsurg.2025.1509292
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and objectives Trigger finger is a common hand condition characterized by the locking of a digit, often requiring surgical intervention when conservative treatments fail. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of a modified percutaneous release technique with those of traditional open release surgery. Materials and methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 245 patients (287 digits), of which 161 digits underwent open release and 126 underwent percutaneous release. A modified technique for percutaneous release was described. Propensity score matching was used to balance the data. Cox regression and Laplace regression were applied to analyze the hazard ratio and median survival time for pain relief and time to return to work. Adverse events were also reported. Results The duration of pain relief in the percutaneous release group was shorter than that in the open release group (hazard ratio = 1.73, 95% CI: 0.98-3.06; p = 0.057). Fifty percent of patients in the percutaneous release group experienced pain relief within two days, compared to seven days in the open release group (p = 0.003). Time to return to work was significantly shorter in the percutaneous release group than in the open release group (hazard ratio = 2.93, 95% CI: 2.08-4.13; p < 0.001). Fifty percent of patients in the percutaneous release group returned to work within three days, compared to 15 days in the open release group (p < 0.001). Three digits (2.4%) required conversion to open release due to the failure of percutaneous release. No nerve injuries or recurrences were observed at a follow-up of 42.2 +/- 2.2 months. Conclusions Percutaneous release resulted in an earlier return to work and a high success rate (97.6%) with no nerve injuries or recurrences over 42 months. Despite a 2.4% failure rate, careful technique minimized complications. Further randomized trials are needed to confirm these findings and optimize patient selection.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Long-term results of percutaneous and open surgery for trigger fingers and thumbs
    Gilberts, ECAM
    Wereldsma, JCJ
    INTERNATIONAL SURGERY, 2002, 87 (01) : 48 - 52
  • [2] Open Heart Surgery in Jehovah's Witnesses: A Propensity Score Analysis
    Mueller, Hannes
    Ratschiller, Thomas
    Schimetta, Wolfgang
    Meier, Jens
    Gombotz, Hans
    Zierer, Andreas
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2020, 109 (02): : 526 - 533
  • [3] Revision of incompletely released trigger fingers by percutaneous release: Results and complications
    Fu, Yin-Chih
    Huang, Pen-Ju
    Tien, Yin-Chu
    Lu, Yen-Mou
    Fu, Hwai-Hui
    Lin, Gau-Tyan
    JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2006, 31A (08): : 1288 - 1291
  • [4] Clinical Study Between Percutaneous Ultrasound-Guided Release and Open Classic Surgery in Treating Multiple Trigger Fingers
    Yavari, Masoud
    Modaresi, Seyed Masoud
    Hassanpour, Seyed Esmail
    Moosavizadeh, Seyed Mehdi
    Tabrizi, Ali
    ADVANCED BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH, 2023, 12 (01):
  • [5] Robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy in octogenarians: a comparative propensity score analysis of perioperative outcomes
    Abreu, Andres A.
    Abbas, Amr I. Al
    Meier, Jennie
    Nunez-Rocha, Ricardo E.
    Farah, Emile
    Ethun, Cecilia G.
    Porembka, Matthew R.
    Mansour, John C.
    Yopp, Adam C.
    Zeh III, Herbert J.
    Wang, Sam C.
    Polanco, Patricio M.
    HPB, 2025, 27 (01) : 37 - 44
  • [6] Comparative Quality of Laparoscopic and Open Cholecystectomy in the Elderly Using Propensity Score Matching Analysis
    Kuwabara, Kazuaki
    Matsuda, Shinya
    Ishikawa, Koichi Benjamin
    Horiguchi, Hiromasa
    Fujimori, Kenji
    GASTROENTEROLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2010, 2010
  • [7] A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Laparoscopic versus Open Surgery in Patients with COPD
    Singh, Supreet
    Merchant, Aziz M.
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE SURGERY, 2021, 34 (01) : 70 - 79
  • [8] Minimally invasive versus open right hepatectomy: comparative study with propensity score matching analysis
    Vinícius Campos Duarte
    Fabricio Ferreira Coelho
    Alain Valverde
    Divia Danoussou
    Jaime Arthur Pirola Kruger
    Kevin Zuber
    Gilton Marques Fonseca
    Vagner Birk Jeismann
    Paulo Herman
    Renato Micelli Lupinacci
    BMC Surgery, 20
  • [9] Minimally invasive versus open right hepatectomy: comparative study with propensity score matching analysis
    Duarte, Vinicius Campos
    Coelho, Fabricio Ferreira
    Valverde, Alain
    Danoussou, Divia
    Kruger, Jaime Arthur Pirola
    Zuber, Kevin
    Fonseca, Gilton Marques
    Jeismann, Vagner Birk
    Herman, Paulo
    Lupinacci, Renato Micelli
    BMC SURGERY, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [10] Robotic versus open oncological gastric surgery in the elderly: a propensity score-matched analysis
    Garbarino, Giovanni Maria
    Costa, Gianluca
    Frezza, Barbara
    Biancafarina, Alessia
    Balducci, Genoveffa
    Mercantini, Paolo
    De Prizio, Marco
    Laracca, Giovanni Gugliemo
    Ceccarelli, Graziano
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2021, 15 (05) : 741 - 749