Retention and dropout from sublingual and extended-release buprenorphine treatment: A comparative analysis of data from a nationally representative sample of commercially-insured people with opiod use disorder in the United States

被引:0
|
作者
Ivasiy, Roman [1 ,2 ]
Madden, Lynn M. [1 ,3 ]
Johnson, Kimberly A. [4 ]
Machavariani, Eteri [1 ]
Ahmad, Bachar [5 ]
Oliveros, David [1 ]
Tan, Jiale [6 ]
Kil, Natalie [1 ]
Altice, Frederick L. [1 ,2 ,3 ,7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Yale Sch Med, Sect Infect Dis, New Haven, CT USA
[2] Yale Univ, Ctr Interdisciplinary Res AIDS, New Haven, CT USA
[3] APT Fdn, New Haven, CT USA
[4] Univ S Florida, Coll Behav & Community Sci, Dept Mental Hlth Law & Policy, Tampa, FL USA
[5] Yale Sch Med, New Haven, CT USA
[6] Univ Michigan, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[7] Yale Univ, Program Computat Biol & Bioinformat, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[8] Yale Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol Microbial Dis, New Haven, CT USA
关键词
Opioid use disorder; Buprenorphine; Extended-release buprenorphine; Medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD); Communicable comorbidities; HIV; HCV; Treatment initiation; Treatment retention; DEPENDENCE; PERSPECTIVES;
D O I
10.1016/j.drugpo.2025.104748
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and aims: Maintenance on medications for opioid use disorder, particularly buprenorphine, is critical for reducing overdose risk and improving health outcomes in the United States. This study evaluates retention and dropout probabilities between sublingual buprenorphine (SL-BUP) and extended-release buprenorphine (XR-BUP) among commercially-insured individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD). Design and setting: A retrospective cohort study using Meretive (TM) Markeskan (R) claims data from 2019 to 2020. A multi-state Markov model assessed transitions between treatment states over 12 months. Participants: The study included 58,933 individuals aged 18-64 years with OUD, initiating SL-BUP (n = 57,520) or XR-BUP (n = 1,413). XR-BUP patients were divided into XR-BUP only (n = 684; 49 %) and XR-BUP with supplemental SL-BUP (XR-BUP+sSL; n = 729; 51 %). Measurements: Primary outcomes included probabilities of remaining in treatment or transitioning between states at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. The impact of dosage and days of supply on retention was also examined. Results: The probability of permanent treatment dropout at 6 months was similar for SL-BUP (38.59 %, 95 % CI: 37.9 %-39.4 %) and XR-BUP (41.3 % 95 %CI: 36.8 %-46.1 %), yet the probability of remaining in treatment was significantly higher for SL-BUP than XR-BUP (49.5 %; 95 %CI: 48.8 %-50.1 % vs. 13.5 % 95 % CI: 10.5 %-16.5 %). The high proportion of individuals initially prescribed XR-BUP later transitioned to SL-BUP. Higher doses and longer days supplied of SL-BUP reduced dropout rates. Among patients receiving >= 16 mg/day and >= 28 days, dropout probabilities were 5.7 % (95 % CI: 5.4 %-6.0 %) at 1 month, 15.4 % (95 % CI: 14.8 %-16.2 %) at 3 months, 28.0 % (95 % CI: 26.9 %-29.2 %) at 6 months, and 47.8 % (95 %CI: 45.2 %-49.5 %) at 12 months. In contrast, patients prescribed <16 mg/day and <28 days had a 46.3 % (95 %CI: 45.0 %-47.6 %) dropout rate by 6 months. Conclusion: SL-BUP demonstrates higher retention rates and lower dropout compared to XR-BUP in real-world settings. Optimizing SL-BUP dosing and providing extended supplies can improve retention and reduce treatment discontinuation.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 1 条
  • [1] Characterizing initiation, use, and discontinuation of extended-release buprenorphine in a nationally representative United States commercially insured cohort
    Morgan, Jake R.
    Walley, Alexander Y.
    Murphy, Sean M.
    Chatterjee, Avik
    Hadland, Scott E.
    Barocas, Joshua
    Linas, Benjamin P.
    Assoumou, Sabrina A.
    DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 2021, 225