Assessing raw material efficiency and waste management for Sustainable Development: A VIKOR and TOPSIS Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis

被引:1
|
作者
Depczynski, Radoslaw [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Szczecin, Inst Management, Doctoral Sch, Cukrowa 8, Szczecin, Poland
关键词
product groups; raw materials; waste management; sustainable development; MCDM; MCDA;
D O I
10.30657/pea.2024.30.50
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
This study explores the integration of sustainability in decision-making processes within a steel manufacturing company in Poland. As global clients increasingly demand sustainable practices, companies must adapt their operations to meet these expectations. We applied Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) methods, specifically TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution) and VIKOR (in Serbian: VlseKriterijuska Optimizacija I Komoromisno Resenje), along with three weighting techniques, namely Entropy, Standard Deviation, and CRITIC (Criteria Importance Through Inter-criteria Correlation), to evaluate the sustainability of four products. Nine criteria were considered, including material type, corrosion protection, surface treatment, and various manufacturing processes. Our findings reveal that the MCDA framework effectively ranks products from most to least sustainable, highlighting the importance of raw material efficiency and waste management. This research demonstrates the practical application of MCDA methods in assessing sustainability within the steel industry, providing a basis for future studies to extend this framework to other manufacturing sectors and regions. Overall, this approach supports informed decision-making, aligning with broader sustainability goals while satisfying the demands of business partners and clients.
引用
收藏
页码:537 / 550
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessing Euro 2020 Strategy Using Multi-criteria Decision Making Methods: VIKOR and TOPSIS
    Ture, Hasan
    Dogan, Seyyide
    Kocak, Deniz
    SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 2019, 142 (02) : 645 - 665
  • [2] Assessing Euro 2020 Strategy Using Multi-criteria Decision Making Methods: VIKOR and TOPSIS
    Hasan Ture
    Seyyide Dogan
    Deniz Kocak
    Social Indicators Research, 2019, 142 : 645 - 665
  • [3] Multi-criteria decision analysis by using fuzzy VIKOR
    Wang, Tien-Chin
    Liang, Jia-Ling
    Ho, Chun-Yen
    2006 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SERVICE SYSTEMS AND SERVICE MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1 AND 2, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, : 901 - 906
  • [4] Assessing the sustainable development: A review of multi-criteria decision analysis for urban and architectural sustainability
    Mecca, Beatrice
    JOURNAL OF MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS, 2023, 30 (5-6) : 203 - 218
  • [5] Application of TOPSIS and VIKOR improved versions in a multi criteria decision analysis to develop an optimized municipal solid waste management model
    Mir, M. Aghajani
    Ghazvinei, P. Taherei
    Sulaiman, N. M. N.
    Basri, N. E. A.
    Saheri, S.
    Mahmood, N. Z.
    Jahan, A.
    Begum, R. A.
    Aghamohammadi, N.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2016, 166 : 109 - 115
  • [6] Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for Waste Management in City of Karaj, Iran
    Amiri, Leila
    Ramezanianpour, Mohammad
    Farahani, Mohammadreza
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2010 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (ICEST 2010), 2010, : 471 - 477
  • [7] Multi-criteria decision analysis for waste management in Saharawi refugee camps
    Garfi, M.
    Tondelli, S.
    Bonoli, A.
    WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2009, 29 (10) : 2729 - 2739
  • [8] A multi-criteria decision analysis assessment of waste paper management options
    Hanan, Deirdre
    Burnley, Stephen
    Cooke, David
    WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2013, 33 (03) : 566 - 573
  • [9] Multi-criteria decision aids for sustainable water management
    Kain, Jaan-Henrik
    Kärrman, Erik
    Söderberg, Henriette
    Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Engineering Sustainability, 2007, 160 (02) : 87 - 93
  • [10] Material flow analysis as a support tool for multi-criteria analysis in solid waste management decision-making
    Makarichi, Luke
    Techato, Kua-anan
    Jutidamrongphan, Warangkana
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2018, 139 : 351 - 365