Comprehensive assessment instruments for place-based sustainable agriculture: a scoping review

被引:0
|
作者
Voisin, Rebecca [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Godrich, Stephanie [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Blake, David [1 ,4 ]
Sambell, Ros [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Herrington, Saranne [1 ]
Joyce, Janine [1 ,5 ]
Horwitz, Pierre [1 ,4 ]
Devine, Amanda [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Edith Cowan Univ, Ctr People Pl & Planet, 270 Joondalup Dr, Joondalup, WA 6027, Australia
[2] Edith Cowan Univ, Sch Med & Hlth Sci, Joondalup, WA, Australia
[3] Edith Cowan Univ, Nutr & Hlth Innovat Res Inst, Joondalup, WA, Australia
[4] Edith Cowan Univ, Sch Sci, Joondalup, WA, Australia
[5] Edith Cowan Univ, Sch Arts & Humanities, Joondalup, WA, Australia
关键词
Sustainable agriculture; On-farm sustainability metrics; Place-based sustainability; Agricultural sustainability assessment; SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH; FOOD SYSTEMS; MANAGEMENT; HEALTH; DETERMINANTS; PERFORMANCE; BEHAVIOR; CULTURE; IMPACT; TOOL;
D O I
10.1007/s11625-025-01629-3
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A rapid transformation to sustainable agricultural production systems is necessary, requiring on-farm monitoring and measurements of key agricultural sustainability indicators. While many assessment methods for agricultural sustainability incorporate a three-pillar model of sustainability: environment, economic, and social, a step beyond this is required to support both human and planetary health. This review takes the position that a more nuanced, yet broader framing of agricultural sustainability is warranted, and identifies the measurement of additional pillars including health and nutrition, production, and responsible governance, plus overlooked aspects including Indigenous cultures. A peer-reviewed and grey literature search was conducted identifying articles (n = 8) discussing comprehensive, more than three-pillar, on-farm sustainability assessment instruments (n = 7). These seven instruments were analysed against an a priori framework of adaptability, modularity, practicality and scalability. Also explored was the usage of the broader sustainability pillars and common themes within the literature. Limited literature was found which encompassed the complexity of the requirements for measuring agricultural sustainability on-farm. A scalable and practical approach to the construction and use of on-farm agricultural sustainability assessment instruments is nascent. This review recommends the examination of instruments in a participatory and transdisciplinary manner to ensure effective operationalisation, acknowledge place-based nuance, and support farmers as potential end-users. Moving forward, the application and design of sustainable agriculture assessment instruments needs to encompass the full range of externalities created by agricultural production systems to actualise sustainability.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Defining Pooled' Place-Based' Budgets for Health and Social Care: A Scoping Review
    Tebaldi, Davide
    Stokes, Jonathan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTEGRATED CARE, 2022, 22 (03):
  • [2] Exploratory Scoping of Place-Based Opportunities for Convergence Research
    Helgeson, Casey
    Auermuller, Lisa
    Gayle, DeeDee Bennett
    Dangendorf, Sonke
    Gilmore, Elisabeth A.
    Keller, Klaus
    Kopp, Robert E.
    Lorenzo-Trueba, Jorge
    Oppenheimer, Michael
    Parrish, Kathleen
    Ramenzoni, Victoria
    Tuana, Nancy
    Wahl, Thomas
    EARTHS FUTURE, 2025, 13 (03)
  • [3] Regional economic assessment of a novel place-based model for sustainable food systems
    Kujala, Susanna
    Koppelmaki, Kari
    GEOGRAPHY AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 5 (02) : 220 - 229
  • [4] Natural experiments for the evaluation of place-based public health interventions: a methodology scoping review
    Albers, Patricia N.
    Rinaldi, Chiara
    Brown, Heather
    Mason, Kate E.
    d'Apice, Katrina
    McGill, Elizabeth
    McQuire, Cheryl
    Craig, Peter
    Laverty, Anthony A.
    Beeson, Morgan
    Campbell, Mhairi
    Egan, Matt
    Gibson, Marcia
    Fuller, Maxwell
    Dillon, Amy
    Taylor-Robinson, David
    Jago, Russell
    Tilling, Kate
    Barr, Benjamin
    Sniehotta, Falko F.
    Hickman, Matthew
    Millett, Christopher J.
    de Vocht, Frank
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 11
  • [5] Scoping review of practice-focused resources to support the implementation of place-based approaches
    Klepac, Bojana
    Branch, Sara
    Mcvey, Laura
    Mowle, Amy
    Riley, Therese
    Craike, Melinda
    HEALTH PROMOTION JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2024, 35 (03) : 596 - 608
  • [6] Place-based approaches to improve health and development outcomes in young children: A scoping review
    Burgemeister, Fiona C.
    Crawford, Sharinne B.
    Hackworth, Naomi J.
    Hokke, Stacey
    Nicholson, Jan M.
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (12):
  • [7] Exploring cooperative place-based approaches to restorative agriculture
    Swagemakers, Paul
    Dominguez Garcia, M. Dolores
    Milone, Pierluigi
    Ventura, Flaminia
    Wiskerke, Johannes S. C.
    JOURNAL OF RURAL STUDIES, 2019, 68 : 191 - 199
  • [8] Constraint-based innovations in agriculture and sustainable development: A scoping review
    Molina-Maturano, Janet
    Speelman, Stijn
    De Steur, Hans
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 246
  • [9] Place branding and sustainable development: a scoping review
    Aguilera-Cora, Elisenda
    Fernandez-Cavia, Jose
    Codina, Lluis
    PLACE BRANDING AND PUBLIC DIPLOMACY, 2025, 21 (01) : 15 - 30
  • [10] Place-based approach to support children's development towards sustainable development goals: A scoping review of current effort and future agenda
    Hoang, Nam-Phuong T.
    Ma, Tianyi
    Silverwood, Amy J.
    Sanders, Matthew R.
    CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES REVIEW, 2024, 164