Fruquintinib in metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicenter real-world analysis on efficacy, safety, and predictive and prognostic factors

Background: Randomized trials have shown a survival benefit for fruquintinib over placebo in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) that progressed after standard therapies, but real-world prognostic analyses have been seldom reported. We evaluated survival, safety outcomes, and predictive and prognostic factors in patients treated with fruquintinib in a real-life setting. Methods: We conducted a multi-center study by collecting relevant data on patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) who received fruquintinib, focusing on progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and L3 skeletal muscle index (SMI), including safety follow-up. Results: From January 2020 to January 2022, a total of 140 patients were selected and included in this study. The cut-off date was 30 July 2022. The median follow-up time was 18.3 months (range, 6-29.3 months) and the median age of included cases was 63 years (range, 32-81 years). The median PFS and OS for the 140 patients was 6.3 and 12.6 months, respectively. The median PFS and OS for the 76 patients who were included in SMI analysis was 6.0 and 12.0 months, respectively. Multivariate analysis suggested brain metastasis {hazard ratio (HR) [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 2.779 (1.162-6.646), P=0.02}, decrease in SMI of >5% [HR (95% CI): 9.732 (2.201-43.028), P=0.003], and baseline carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level [HR (95% CI): 4.061 (1.391-11.858), P=0.01] as independent predictors of OS. The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were hypertension (24, 17.1%), fatigue (21, 15%), and hand-foot syndrome (20, 14.3%); 9 (13.6%) and 15 (10.7%) patients had dose reduction and treatment discontinuation due to TRAEs respectively. Conclusions: The real-world efficacy and safety of fruquintinib in advanced CRC patients are numerically. superior to that in the previous phase III studies. SMI, brain metastasis and CEA could serve as potential markers for patient selection