Single-Center Experience With High-Density Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients With Refractory Angina Pectoris

被引:4
|
作者
Vervaat, Fabienne E. [1 ]
van Suijlekom, Hans
Wijnbergen, Inge F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Catharina Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Michelangelolaan 2, NL-5623 EJ Eindhoven, Netherlands
来源
NEUROMODULATION | 2024年 / 27卷 / 07期
关键词
High-density stimulation; refractory angina pectoris; spinal cord stimulation; PAIN; SYMPTOMS; BURST;
D O I
10.1016/j.neurom.2022.11.006
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objectives: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a treatment option for patients with refractory angina pectoris (RAP) which was first used in 1987 and led to a reduction in the number of angina pectoris episodes, less consumption of short-acting nitrates, and an improvement in the quality of life. The conventional mode of stimulation leads to paresthesia felt at the target area. In recent years novel modes of stimulation have been developed that are paresthesia free, such as " burst, " "high-density (HD)," or " high- frequency/10 kHz" stimulation. To date, these new modes of stimulation have not been used in patients with RAP and a spinal cord stimulator. This retrospective, single-center, observational study gives a description of the experience of using HD stimulation in selected patients with RAP being treated with SCS.<br /> Materials and Methods: All patients with RAP who received a spinal cord stimulator as treatment at our center from September 2009 to February 2021 were screened. Patients were eligible for inclusion into this retrospective, observational study if 1) patients had used HD stimulation, or 2) were currently using HD stimulation.<br /> Results: Fifty-three patients out of a total of 157 patients who had a spinal cord stimulator due to RAP use or have used HD stimulation. In most patients (79.2%), the reason for switching from conventional to HD stimulation was due to progression of symptoms under conventional stimulation. The average duration of conventional stimulation use prior to switching to HD stimulation was 40.3 (+/- 29.6) months. In total, 26 patients (of 53 patients; 49.1%) were using HD stimulation at the end of the follow-up period or until lost to follow-up, and two patients used both forms of stimulation interchangeably. Five patients (9.4%) had stopped using SCS, and 20 patients (37.7%) switched back to conventional stimulation due to a variety of reasons.<br /> Conclusions: This retrospective study shows that the use of HD stimulation in patients with RAP being treated with SCS could be an alternative option for conventional stimulation. Due to the nature of this study, additional research is essential to confirm these initial findings.
引用
收藏
页码:1234 / 1239
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Spinal cord stimulation for refractory angina pectoris: A shocking experience
    Murphy, PM
    MacSullivan, R
    NEUROMODULATION, 2004, 7 (04): : 246 - 248
  • [2] Spinal Cord Stimulation for Refractory Angina Pectoris
    Lee, Seong Heon
    Jeong, Hye Jin
    Jeong, Sin Ho
    Lee, Hyung Gon
    Choi, Jeong Il
    Yoon, Myung Ha
    Kim, Woong Mo
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2012, 25 (02): : 121 - 125
  • [3] Spinal Cord Stimulation for Refractory Angina Pectoris
    Shabalov, Vladimir
    Murtazin, Vladimir
    Ashurkov, Andrei
    Duishobaev, Abdirakman
    Krivoshapkin, Alexei
    STEREOTACTIC AND FUNCTIONAL NEUROSURGERY, 2013, 91 : 272 - 272
  • [4] Spinal Cord Stimulation for Refractory Angina Pectoris
    Hale, Jason
    Bailey-Classen, Ashley
    Cheng, Jianguo
    PAIN MEDICINE, 2020, 21 (01) : 198 - 200
  • [5] Spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of refractory angina pectoris
    Osenbach, RK
    Haines, SJ
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN NEUROSURGERY, 1999, 9 (06) : 394 - 406
  • [6] Spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of refractory angina pectoris
    Tykocki, Tomasz
    Guzek, Krystyna
    Mandat, Tomasz
    KARDIOLOGIA POLSKA, 2011, 69 (04) : 383 - 387
  • [7] Longevity and costs of spinal cord stimulation systems in patients with refractory angina pectoris
    Jessurun, GAJ
    TenVaarwerk, IAM
    Tulner, SAF
    Schonhuth, CCP
    Staal, MJ
    DeJongste, MJL
    PACEMAKER LEADS 1997, 1997, : 613 - 619
  • [8] Clinical outcome of patients treated with spinal cord stimulation for therapeutically refractory angina pectoris
    TenVaarwerk, IAM
    Jessurun, GAJ
    DeJongste, MJL
    Andersen, C
    Mannheimer, C
    Eliasson, T
    Tadema, W
    Staal, MJ
    HEART, 1999, 82 (01) : 82 - 88
  • [9] Effect of spinal cord stimulation on myocardial perfusion reserve in patients with refractory angina pectoris
    Saraste, Antti
    Ukkonen, Heikki
    Varis, Antti
    Vasankari, Tuija
    Tunturi, Satu
    Taittonen, Markku
    Rautakorpi, Pirkka
    Luotolahti, Matti
    Airaksinen, K. E. Juhani
    Knuuti, Juhani
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2015, 16 (04) : 449 - 455
  • [10] The Use of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire in Patients Who Underwent Spinal Cord Stimulation for Refractory Angina Pectoris
    Langford, Brendan
    Hunt, Christine
    Lerman, Amir
    Mauck, William D.
    PAIN MEDICINE, 2021, 22 (04) : 1005 - 1009