Risk prediction models for post-intensive care syndrome of ICU discharged patients: A systematic review

被引:0
|
作者
Yang, Pengfei [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Fu [2 ]
Wang, Qi [3 ]
Fang, Fang [1 ,2 ]
Yu, Qian [2 ]
Tai, Rui [2 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Med, Sch Nursing, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Gen Hosp, Dept Nursing, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Med, Sch Publ Hlth, Shanghai, Peoples R China
关键词
Critical care; Post-intensive care syndrome; Prediction model; Systematic review; CRITICAL ILLNESS; UNIT PATIENTS; SURVIVORSHIP; IMPAIRMENTS; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijnss.2024.10.012
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Objectives: This systematic review aimed to assess the properties and feasibility of existing risk prediction models for post-intensive care syndrome outcomes in adult survivors of critical illness. Methods: As of November 1, 2023, Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, PsycInfo, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), SinoMed, Wanfang database, and China Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP) were searched. Following the literature screening process, we extracted data encompassing participant sources, post-intensive care syndrome (PICS) outcomes, sample sizes, missing data, predictive factors, model development methodologies, and metrics for model performance and evaluation. We conducted a review and classification of the PICS domains and predictive factors identified in each study. The Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool was employed to assess the quality and applicability of the studies. Results: This systematic review included a total of 16 studies, comprising two cognitive impairment studies, four psychological impairment studies, eight physiological impairment studies, and two studies on all three domains. The discriminative ability of prediction models measured by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.68-0.90. The predictive performance of most models was excellent, but most models were biased and overfitted. All predictive factors tend to encompass age, preICU functional impairment, in-ICU experiences, and early-onset new symptoms. Conclusions: This review identified 16 prediction models and the predictive factors for PICS. Nonetheless, due to the numerous methodological and reporting shortcomings identified in the studies under review, clinicians should exercise caution when interpreting the predictions made by these models. To avert the development of PICS, it is imperative for clinicians to closely monitor prognostic factors, including the in- ICU experience and early-onset new symptoms.<br /> (c) 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of the Chinese Nursing Association. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:81 / 88
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prediction Models of Post-Intensive Care Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Risk of Bias Assessment
    Haines, K. J.
    McPeake, J. M.
    Hibbert, E.
    Mikkelsen, M. E.
    Collins, G.
    Hough, C. L.
    Leggett, N.
    Skidmore, B.
    Andrews, A.
    Still, M.
    Iwashyna, T. J.
    Harhay, M. O.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2020, 201
  • [2] Quality of life in ICU survivors and their relatives with post-intensive care syndrome: A systematic review
    Gravante, Francesco
    Trotta, Francesca
    Latina, Salvatore
    Simeone, Silvio
    Alvaro, Rosaria
    Vellone, Ercole
    Pucciarelli, Gianluca
    NURSING IN CRITICAL CARE, 2024, 29 (04) : 807 - 823
  • [3] RISK FACTORS FOR POST-INTENSIVE CARE SYNDROME: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Kang, Jiyeon
    Lee, Minju
    Jeong, Yeon Jin
    AUSTRALIAN CRITICAL CARE, 2020, 33 : S41 - S41
  • [4] Post-Intensive Care Syndrome in Covid-19 Patients Discharged From the Intensive Care Unit
    Gardashkhani, Sevda
    Ajri-Khameslou, Mehdi
    Heidarzadeh, Mehdi
    Sedigh, SeyedMohammad Rajaei
    JOURNAL OF HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE NURSING, 2021, 23 (06) : 530 - 538
  • [5] Risk factors for post-intensive care syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lee, Minju
    Kang, Jiyeon
    Jeong, Yeon Jin
    AUSTRALIAN CRITICAL CARE, 2020, 33 (03) : 287 - 294
  • [6] Association between inflammation and post-intensive care syndrome: a systematic review
    Docherty, C.
    Page, C.
    Wilson, J.
    Ross, P.
    Garrity, K.
    Quasim, T.
    Shaw, M.
    McPeake, J.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2024, 79 (07) : 748 - 758
  • [7] The risk of post-intensive care syndrome among patients hospitalised in the intensive care unit
    Bialek, Katarzyna
    MEDICAL STUDIES-STUDIA MEDYCZNE, 2021, 37 (01) : 70 - 76
  • [8] Chronic Post-ICU Pain and Post-Intensive Care Syndrome
    Johnson, Jessica L.
    Al-Dahir, Sara A.
    US PHARMACIST, 2016, 41 (03) : HS11 - +
  • [9] Recovery After ICU Discharge: Post-Intensive Care Syndrome
    Makic, Mary Beth Flynn
    JOURNAL OF PERIANESTHESIA NURSING, 2016, 31 (02) : 172 - 174
  • [10] Post-Intensive Care Syndrome in Neurocritical Care Patients
    Dangayach, Neha S.
    Kreitzer, Natalie
    Foreman, Brandon
    Tosto-Mancuso, Jenna
    SEMINARS IN NEUROLOGY, 2024, 44 (03) : 398 - 411