共 50 条
Exploring Anesthesiology Management of Living Donor Liver Transplantation: Survey From the Society for the Advancement of Transplant Anesthesia and the Korean Society for Transplantation Anesthesiologists
被引:0
|作者:
Crouch, Cara E.
[1
]
Ko, Justin Sangwook
[2
]
Hendrickse, Adrian
[1
]
Kumar, Sathish S.
[3
]
Little, Michael
[4
]
Chae, Min Suk
[5
]
Park, Sun Young
[6
]
Sakai, Tetsuro
[7
]
机构:
[1] Univ Colorado, Dept Anesthesiol, Aurora, CO USA
[2] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Samsung Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiologists & Pain Med, Dept Med,Sch Med, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Univ Michigan, Dept Anesthesiol, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[4] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr San Antonio, Dept Anesthesiol, San Antonio, TX USA
[5] Catholic Univ Korea, Seoul St Marys Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Med, Seoul, South Korea
[6] Soonchunhyang Univ, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Med, Seoul Hosp, Seoul, South Korea
[7] Univ Pittsburgh, Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol & Perioperat Med, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
关键词:
anesthesiology;
liver transplantation;
patient safety;
survey;
D O I:
10.1111/ctr.15428
中图分类号:
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Introduction: While living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) serves as the predominant method of adult liver transplant (LT) in the Republic of Korea (ROK), it represents a minority of LT in the United States (US). A survey was conducted to gain insight into these nations' anesthetic management. Methods: An electronic questionnaire was distributed to directors of LT anesthesiology overseeing LDLT programs in both countries between May 2021 and October 2021. Results: The response rate was 93.0% (100% [37/37] in the US and 80% [16/20] in the ROK). Both countries mainly adhered to deceased donor LT recipient management practices, including the frequency of routine pulmonary artery catheter use, transesophageal echocardiography, and point-of-care coagulation monitoring. Differences were observed in early extubation of recipients (US vs. ROK: 39.7% vs. 14.7% of all cases), participation in donor selection meetings (88.9% [32/36] vs. 6.3% [1/16], p < 0.0001), application of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery donor protocol (69.4% [25/36] vs. 12.5% [2/16], p < 0.0001), and cell saver usage for donors (94.4% [34/36] vs. 18.8% [3/16], p < 0.0001). More ROK programs implemented simultaneous donor/recipient anesthesia supervision by a single anesthesiologist. Conclusions: Several important differences were identified between the US and the ROK in adult LDLT anesthetic management.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文