Effects of agricultural plastic films on crop growth and soil health in tobacco fields: A comparative study

被引:0
|
作者
Xia, Hao [1 ]
Shen, Jia [1 ]
Riaz, Muhammad [4 ]
Ran, Fafen [2 ]
Cheng, Tingming [2 ]
Wang, Xueying [2 ]
Dong, Qing [1 ]
Zu, Chaolong [1 ]
Liu, Bo [3 ]
Babar, Saba [5 ]
Jiang, Chaoqiang [1 ]
机构
[1] Anhui Acad Agr Sci AAAS, Inst Ind Crops, Hefei 230001, Peoples R China
[2] Anhui Wannan Tobacco Co, Xuancheng 242000, Peoples R China
[3] Hubei Acad Agr Sci, Inst Plant Protect & Soil Fertilizer, Key Lab Fertilizat Agr Wastes, Minist Agr & Rural Affairs, Wuhan 430064, Hubei, Peoples R China
[4] Zhongkai Univ Agr & Engn, Coll Resources & Environm, Guangzhou 510225, Peoples R China
[5] Huazhong Agr Univ, Coll Resources & Environm, Microelement Res Ctr, Wuhan 430070, Hubei, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Photodegradation film; Microplastics; Soil health; Bacteria; Fungal; ORGANIC-CARBON; WATER; MULCH; PRODUCTIVITY; POLLUTION; BEHAVIOR; IMPACT; YIELD;
D O I
10.1016/j.apsoil.2024.105795
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
In recent years, the impact of microplastics on soil microorganisms and crop growth has gained significant attention. However, the effects of agricultural plastic films on crop growth and soil health in tobacco fields are not clear. In our study, we conducted field experiments to investigate the effects of six types of agricultural film treatments on soil fertility, soil microbial community, and plant growth. Compositions of study treatments were as follows: T1: farmhouse film; T2: photodegradation film; T3: black film (6 mu m); T4: black film (8 mu m); T5: transparent film (6 mu m); T6: transparent film (8 mu m). Our results showed that photodegradable film treatment was beneficial for promoting crop growth and root development. The fresh stem biomass, dry root biomass, and dry stem biomass were significantly increased by 14.58 %, 68.70 %, and 18.27 %, respectively, under the T2 treatment, when compared to the T1 treatment. In addition, our results showed that photodegradation film treatment maintained soil pH value, compared with other agricultural film treatments. The application of photodegradation film treatment offered advantageous effects in the preservation of soil moisture and temperature. In addition, the diversity of soil microorganisms improved with photodegradable film. Compared to T1 treatment, the number of OTUs of bacteria and fungi improved by 1.94-7.64 % and 7.39-30.08 % under other treatments, respectively. Furthermore, our study showed that pH emerged as the paramount environmental determinant. The number of subnetworks treated with photodegradable film significantly increased, indicating a more complex and stable functional diversity of soil microbial communities. Additionally, compared to bacteria, fungal communities exhibited greater adaptability and stability. The results of this study support the view that photodegradable film can be employed, as it can to enhance crop yield, improve soil quality, maintain a favorable ecological environment, and mitigate the adverse environmental impact of microplastics.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparative Analysis of the Effects of Plastic Mulch Films on Soil Nutrient, Yields and Soil Microbiome in Three Vegetable Fields
    Shan, Xi
    Zhang, Wei
    Dai, Zhongliang
    Li, Jianbin
    Mao, Weiwei
    Yu, Fangwei
    Ma, Jinjun
    Wang, Shenyun
    Zeng, Xiaoping
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2022, 12 (02):
  • [2] Soil and total ecosystem respiration in agricultural fields: effect of soil and crop type
    Annalea Lohila
    Mika Aurela
    Kristiina Regina
    Tuomas Laurila
    Plant and Soil, 2003, 251 : 303 - 317
  • [3] Soil and total ecosystem respiration in agricultural fields: effect of soil and crop type
    Lohila, A
    Aurela, M
    Regina, K
    Laurila, T
    PLANT AND SOIL, 2003, 251 (02) : 303 - 317
  • [4] Permeation of soil fumigants through agricultural plastic films
    Austerweil, M.
    Steiner, B.
    Gamliel, A.
    PHYTOPARASITICA, 2006, 34 (05) : 491 - 501
  • [5] Permeation of soil fumigants through agricultural plastic films
    M. Austerweil
    B. Steiner
    A. Gamliel
    Phytoparasitica, 2006, 34 : 491 - 501
  • [6] A comparative study of two methods for modeling soil water regime in agricultural fields
    National Research Council, c/o U.S. Environ. Protection Agency, Athens, GA 30605, United States
    不详
    不详
    Water Resour. Manage., 4 (285-293):
  • [7] A Comparative Study of Two Methods for Modeling Soil Water Regime in Agricultural Fields
    John X. Tsiros
    Stamatis Elmaloglou
    Robert B. Ambrose
    Water Resources Management, 1998, 12 : 285 - 293
  • [8] A Comparative Study of Two Methods for Modeling Soil Water Regime in Agricultural Fields
    Tsiros, John X.
    Elmaloglou, Stamatis
    Ambrose, Robert B., Jr.
    WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 1998, 12 (04) : 285 - 293
  • [9] A GPS backpack system for mapping soil and crop parameters in agricultural fields
    Stafford, JV
    LeBars, JM
    JOURNAL OF NAVIGATION, 1996, 49 (01): : 9 - 21
  • [10] Absorption of pesticides on plastic films used as agricultural soil covers
    Nerin, C
    Tornes, AR
    Domeno, C
    Cacho, J
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 1996, 44 (12) : 4009 - 4014