Pragmatic Comparative Research: Pragmatism as a Philosophy of Science for Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA)

被引:0
|
作者
Garces-Velastegui, Pablo [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Inst Sociol & Polit Sci, Trondheim, Norway
[2] Inst Altos Estudios Nacl Ecuador, Escuela Relac Int, Quito, Ecuador
来源
SOCIOLOGY COMPASS | 2024年 / 18卷 / 12期
关键词
fuzzy sets; methodology; philosophy of science; pragmatism; qualitative comparative analysis; sociology; WOMENS REPRESENTATION; COMPLEXITY;
D O I
10.1111/soc4.70021
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) is a set-theoretic approach that enables accounting for causal complexity, incorporating features of qualitative and quantitative methods. Pioneered in sociology, it is increasingly used in comparative research to explain social phenomena in various disciplines. Despite its growing adoption, and because of its eclectic nature, some methodological themes have proven elusive. Its philosophy of science is one such issue. Philosophical pragmatism, which focuses on action, rather than the mind as rationalism or things as empiricism, is proposed to fill this void. Moving beyond the positivist-interpretivist dichotomy, this paper argues that pragmatism's philosophical wagers support QCA's assumptions and practice. Moreover, pragmatism's implications in terms of practical consequences, provisionality of insights, plurality of method, and public participation provide fertile soil on which QCA-based inquiry can sow, producing pragmatic comparative research.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条