Web-based educational tools and decision aids for patients with advanced cancer: A systematic review

被引:0
|
作者
Ullrich, Phoebe [1 ,2 ]
Voss, Henrike [1 ]
Thomas, Michael [1 ]
Villalobos, Matthias [1 ]
机构
[1] Heidelberg Univ Hosp, Translat Lung Res Ctr Heidelberg TLRC H, German Ctr Lung Res DZL, Dept Thorac Oncol,Thoraxklin Heidelberg, Rontgenstr 1, D-69126 Heidelberg, Germany
[2] Heidelberg Univ Hosp, AGAPLES Bethanien Hosp Heidelberg, Ctr Geriatr Med, Heidelberg, Germany
关键词
Advanced cancer; Oncology; Decision aid; Decision support intervention; Shared decision-making; Patient Empowerment; Web-based information; PALLIATIVE CARE; SUPPORT; WOMEN; INTERVENTION; CHEMOTHERAPY; INVOLVEMENT; PREFERENCE; ENHANCE; ROLES; PILOT;
D O I
10.1016/j.pec.2025.108706
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objectives: To provide an overview of existing interactive web-based educational tools and decision aids for patients with advanced cancer and to evaluate their development process, content, feasibility, usability, and effectiveness. Methods: Systematic literature search from inception to November 2023; screening with Covidence software; narrative analysis of results and quality assessment with the SUNDAE checklist. Results: Sixteen web-based tools were identified: Seven for breast cancer, six for other specific cancers, and three for mixed populations. Studies predominantly used literature reviews, focus groups, and/or pre-existing tools for the development. The tools were heterogeneous and not all integrated aspects of end-of-life care. User tests included controlled trials, prospective interventional cohort studies, and a retrospective observational study, involving a total of 6192 patients. Results showed partially low adoption and infrequent use. Feasibility and usability were positively rated with high rates of user satisfaction. Preparation for and involvement in decisionmaking was partially supported by increased knowledge and improved doctor-patient relationships. Effects on involvement and self-efficacy in decision-making, participation, and distress were uncertain. Effects on quality of life, hope, anxiety, engagement in palliative care/advance directives, and survival were not found. Conclusions: Despite high user satisfaction and adequate feasibility and usability, the evidence for other outcomes is diverse and low for long-term implementation. Tools are very heterogeneous in cancer entities and content. Although targeting patients with advanced cancer not all tools integrate aspects of palliative care and end-of-life. Practice implications: In advanced cancer care, patient involvement in decision-making is complex. Web-based solutions are promising because of easy accessibility and dissemination and the ability to adapt information to patients' needs and new treatment developments. Still, only a few evidence-based web-based educational tools and decision aids are available. Filling this gap is essential to empower patients to make informed and goalconcordant treatment decisions.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Web-based decision aids for cancer clinical decisions: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tong, Guixian
    Geng, Qingqing
    Wang, Debin
    Liu, Tongzhu
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2021, 29 (11) : 6929 - 6941
  • [2] Web-based decision aids for cancer clinical decisions: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Guixian Tong
    Qingqing Geng
    Debin Wang
    Tongzhu Liu
    Supportive Care in Cancer, 2021, 29 : 6929 - 6941
  • [3] A Systematic Review of Web-Based Educational Interventions
    Fredericks, Suzanne
    Martorella, Geraldine
    Catallo, Cristina
    CLINICAL NURSING RESEARCH, 2015, 24 (01) : 91 - 113
  • [4] Readability and cultural sensitivity of web-based patient decision aids for cancer screening and treatment: A systematic review
    Thomson, M. D.
    Hoffman-Goetz, L.
    MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND THE INTERNET IN MEDICINE, 2007, 32 (04): : 263 - 286
  • [5] Web-based decision aids to support breast cancer screening decisions: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yu, Lin
    Li, Ping
    Yang, Shu
    Guo, Pingping
    Zhang, Xuehui
    Liu, Na
    Wang, Jie
    Zhang, Wei
    JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH, 2020, 9 (14) : 985 - 1002
  • [6] Feasibility of web-based decision aids in neurological patients
    van Til, Janine A.
    Drossaert, Constance H. C.
    Renzenbrink, Gerbert J.
    Snoek, Govert J.
    Dijkstra, Evelien
    Stiggelbout, Anne M.
    Ijzerman, Maarten J.
    JOURNAL OF TELEMEDICINE AND TELECARE, 2010, 16 (01) : 48 - 52
  • [7] Web-based surgical educational tools
    John, NW
    Riding, M
    Phillips, NI
    Mackay, S
    Steineke, L
    Fontaine, B
    Reitmayr, G
    Valancic, V
    Zimic, N
    Emmen, A
    Manolakaki, E
    Theodoros, D
    MEDICINE MEETS VIRTUAL REALITY 2001: OUTER SPACE, INNER SPACE, VIRTUAL SPACE, 2001, 81 : 212 - 217
  • [8] Evaluation of decision support tools for patients with advanced cancer: A systematic review of literature
    Tapp, Diane
    Blais, Marie-Claude
    PALLIATIVE & SUPPORTIVE CARE, 2019, 17 (03) : 356 - 364
  • [9] Web-based decision aids to support young women with breast cancer
    Foster, Claire
    Recio-Saucedo, Alex
    Grimmett, Chloe
    Cutress, Ramsey
    Eccles, Diana
    Armstrong, Anne
    Gerty, Sue
    Turner, Lesley
    Mason, Shelly
    Copson, Ellen
    Eccles, Bryony
    Evans, Gareth
    Ahmed, Munaza
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2015, 24 : 4 - 5
  • [10] Web-based tools for microRNAs involved in human cancer (Review)
    Mar-Aguilar, Fermin
    Rodriguez-Padilla, Cristina
    Resendez-Perez, Diana
    ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 2016, 11 (06) : 3563 - 3570