Disruption Driving Innovation: Optimising Efficiency in Functional Neurosurgery

被引:1
|
作者
Zrinzo, Ludvic [1 ]
Akram, Harith [1 ]
Hyam, Jonathan [1 ]
Candelario-Mckeown, Joseph [1 ]
Rangnekar, Ranjit [1 ]
Nwanze, Ashley [2 ]
Xu, San San [1 ]
Foltynie, Thomas [1 ]
Limousin, Patricia [1 ]
Krueger, Marie T. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Hosp Neurol & Neurosurg, Dept Neurosurg, Unit Funct Neurosurg, London, England
[2] Natl Hosp Neurol & Neurosurg, Dept Neurosurg, Gen Management, London, England
[3] Univ Med Ctr, Dept Stereotact & Funct Neurosurg, Freiburg, Germany
关键词
Optimising workflow; Safety and efficiency; Surgical waiting time; Deep brain stimulation; Radiofrequency ablation; OPERATIVE DURATION; STIMULATION; INFECTION; RISK;
D O I
10.1159/000542110
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Introduction: Rising NHS waiting lists are a major problem following the COVID-19 pandemic. In our institution, surgical waiting time for elective functional neurosurgical procedures, such as deep brain stimulation (DBS) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA), reached >1.5 years by the end of 2022. During 2023, reduced operating room availability, intraoperative MRI (iMRI) suite closure for refurbishment, and ongoing strikes threatened to increase waiting times further. Methods: Our previous surgical workflow for DBS and RFA procedures was examined. Several aspects were identified, and changes implemented to increase efficiency. Procedure numbers, waiting times, lead placement accuracy, and complication rates before and after these changes were compared. Results: Prior to 2023, an average of 0.8 new procedures were performed per surgical list. Introduction of a new workflow in 2023 allowed an average of 1.6 new procedures per surgical list (100% increase in productivity). In 2023, 95 DBS and 31 RFA procedures were performed on 79 surgical lists. This represents a 52% increase over "pre-pandemic" activity in 2019 (74 DBS, 9 RFA) on 102 available surgical lists. Mean (SD) targeting accuracy (0.8 [0.4] mm) was comparable to previous years (0.9[0.3] mm). In 2023, there were no infections requiring hardware removal and only one asymptomatic haemorrhage following an RFA procedure. The surgical waiting time was reduced from >1.5 years to <4 months by the end of 2023. Conclusion: Changes in surgical workflow, with neurosurgeons working in parallel, maximise surgical efficiency and productivity, significantly increasing the number of DBS and RFA procedures without compromising accuracy and safety.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Functional ceramics - A driving force for innovation
    不详
    ADVANCED ENGINEERING MATERIALS, 2000, 2 (06) : 318 - 318
  • [2] Innovation in neurosurgery
    Ammirati, Mario
    ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA, 2017, 159 (10) : 1955 - 1956
  • [3] Innovation in neurosurgery
    Mario Ammirati
    Acta Neurochirurgica, 2017, 159 : 1955 - 1956
  • [4] Driving effect of fiscal policy on regional innovation efficiency
    Li, Cui
    Qi, Yawei
    ECONOMIC RESEARCH-EKONOMSKA ISTRAZIVANJA, 2022, 36 (01): : 1 - 19
  • [5] Balancing Operative Efficiency and Surgical Education: A Functional Neurosurgery Model
    Rao, Abigail J.
    Bullis, Carli
    Holste, Katherine G.
    Teton, Zoe
    Burchiel, Kim J.
    Raslan, Ahmed M.
    OPERATIVE NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 17 (06) : 622 - 631
  • [6] Technological innovation and neurosurgery
    Ammirati, Mario
    ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA, 2021, 163 (08) : 2093 - 2093
  • [7] Horizon Discovery: Driving Innovation for Functional Genomics Screening
    不详
    CRISPR JOURNAL, 2019, 2 (02): : 105 - 107
  • [8] Technological innovation and neurosurgery
    Mario Ammirati
    Acta Neurochirurgica, 2021, 163 : 2093 - 2093
  • [9] Improvement and innovation in neurosurgery
    Sendeski, Mauricio
    ARQUIVOS DE NEURO-PSIQUIATRIA, 2014, 72 (02) : 89 - 90
  • [10] Technological Innovation Efficiency in China: Dynamic Evaluation and Driving Factors
    Wang, Qian
    Chen, Yang
    Guan, Heshan
    Lyulyov, Oleksii
    Pimonenko, Tetyana
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (14)