Flow structure in a compound channel: Benchmarking 2D and 3D numerical models

被引：0

作者：

Kimura, I. ^{[1
]}

Bousmar, D. ^{[2
]}

Archambeau, P. ^{[3
]}

Dewals, B. ^{[3
]}

Erpicum, S. ^{[3
]}

Pirotton, M. ^{[3
]}

Li, X. ^{[3
]}

Dordevic, D. ^{[4
]}

Rosic, N. ^{[4
]}

Zindovic, B. ^{[4
]}

Echeverribar, I. ^{[5
]}

Navas Montilla, A. ^{[5
]}

Brufau, P. ^{[5
]}

Garcia Navarro, M. P. ^{[5
]}

de Linares, M. Gonzales ^{[6
]}

Paquier, A. ^{[7
]}

Kopmann, R. ^{[8
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Toyama, Toyama, Japan

[2] Serv Publ Wallonie, Chatelet, Belgium

[3] Univ Liege, Liege, Belgium

[4] Univ Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia

[5] Univ Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain

[6] Artelia, Echirolles, France

[7] Inrae Riverly, Villeurbanne, France

[8] Fed Waterways Engn & Res Inst, Karlsruhe, Germany

来源：

RIVER FLOW 2022 | 2024年

关键词：

SHALLOW; SIMULATION;

D O I：

10.1201/9781003323037-8

中图分类号：

X [环境科学、安全科学];

学科分类号：

08 ; 0830 ;

摘要：

The benchmarking test of 2D and 3D numerical models on a compound channel flow with a rectangular shaped main channel and a rectangular shaped floodplain was carried out by the IAHR Working Group on Compound Channels. The selected test case is the flume experiment by Nezu and Tominaga (1991). Nine depth-averaged 2D models and four 3D models participated in the benchmark. In the 2D models, the depth averaged streamwise velocity profiles in the lateral direction were compared. In the 3D models, velocity components in three directions as well as the distribution of the turbulence kinetic energy in a cross-section were compared. Through the comparison, the applicability and limitations of each model are highlighted and discussed with regard to the model characteristics.

引用

页码：51 / 60

页数：10

共 50 条

[1] Numerical observations of turbulence structure modification in channel flow over 2D and 3D rough walls
De Marchis, M.
Milici, B.
Napoli, E.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEAT AND FLUID FLOW, 2015, 56 : 108 - 123
[2] Bed load transport modeling of a secondary flow influenced curved channel with 2D and 3D numerical models
Riesterer, Jochen
Wenka, Thomas
Brudy-Zippelius, Thomas
Nestmann, Franz
JOURNAL OF APPLIED WATER ENGINEERING AND RESEARCH, 2016, 4 (01): : 54 - 66
[3] 2D and 3D numerical models of inductive SFCL
Kozak, S.
Janowski, T.
Wojtasiewicz, G.
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON APPLIED SUPERCONDUCTIVITY, 2007, 17 (02) : 1791 - 1794
[4] COMPARISON OF 2D AND 3D MODELS OF SALINITY NUMERICAL SIMULATION
Li Chunhui
Pan Xishan
Ke Jie
Dong Xiaotian
POLISH MARITIME RESEARCH, 2015, 22 : 26 - 29
[5] 2D and 3D numerical models of the growth of foraminiferal shells
Labaj, P
Topa, P
Tyszka, J
Alda, W
COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE - ICCS 2003, PT I, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, 2657 : 669 - 678
[6] Uniform flow in prismatic compound channel: Benchmarking numerical models
Bousmar, D.
Mathurin, B.
Fernandes, J. N. S.
Filonovich, M.
Hazlewood, C.
Huthoff, F.
Leal, J. B.
Paquier, A.
Proust, S.
RIVER FLOW 2016, 2016, : 272 - 280
[7] 2D and 3D numerical models to evaluate trabecular bone damage
Buccino, Federica
Colombo, Chiara
Duarte, Daniel Hernando Lozano
Rinaudo, Luca
Ulivieri, Fabio Massimo
Vergani, Laura Maria
MEDICAL & BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING & COMPUTING, 2021, 59 (10) : 2139 - 2152
[8] Numerical coupling of 2D and 3D ground water models: An application
Vogt, M
Horst, R
Gerding, M
COMPUTER METHODS AND WATER RESOURCES III, 1996, : 99 - 108
[9] Fault detection methods for 2D and 3D geomechanical numerical models
Adwan, Anthony
Maillot, Bertrand
Souloumiac, Pauline
Barnes, Christophe
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL AND ANALYTICAL METHODS IN GEOMECHANICS, 2024, 48 (02) : 607 - 625
[10] 2D and 3D numerical models to evaluate trabecular bone damage
Federica Buccino
Chiara Colombo
Daniel Hernando Lozano Duarte
Luca Rinaudo
Fabio Massimo Ulivieri
Laura Maria Vergani
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 2021, 59 : 2139 - 2152

← 1 2 3 4 5 →