Costs and Benefits of the Melbourne Mobile Stroke Unit Compared With Standard Ambulance: Causal Analysis Using Observational Linked Data

被引:0
|
作者
Cadilhac, Dominique A. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Birhanu, Mulugeta Molla [1 ,2 ]
Churilov, Leonid [3 ,4 ]
Zhao, Henry [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Coote, Skye [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Campbell, Bruce C. V. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Langenberg, Francesca [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Davis, Stephen M. [3 ,4 ]
Donnan, Geoffrey A. [3 ,4 ]
Smith, Karen [6 ,7 ,8 ,9 ]
Kim, Joosup [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Fac Med Nursing & Hlth Sci, Stroke & Ageing Res, Clayton, Vic, Australia
[2] Florey Inst Neurosci & Mental Hlth, Stroke Theme, Parkville, Australia
[3] Univ Melbourne, Royal Melbourne Hosp, Melbourne Brain Ctr, Dept Med & Neurol, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[4] Melbourne Brain Ctr, Australian Stroke Alliance, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[5] Ambulance Victoria, Mobile Stroke Unit, Doncaster, Australia
[6] Dept Res & Innovat, Silverchain, Vic, Australia
[7] Monash Univ, Dept Epidemiol & Prevent Med, Clayton, Vic, Australia
[8] Curtin Univ, Dept Populat Hlth, Bentley, WA, Australia
[9] Queensland Univ Technol, Sch Nursing, Brisbane City, Australia
基金
澳大利亚国家健康与医学研究理事会; 英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
ambulances; cost-effectiveness analysis; information storage and retrieval; outcome assessment; health care; registries; routinely collected data; stroke; ACUTE ISCHEMIC-STROKE; PREHOSPITAL THROMBOLYSIS; REPERFUSION THERAPY; FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES; TRIAL; ASSOCIATION; STATEMENT; TIME;
D O I
10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.048403
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Evidence of the cost implications and health outcomes associated with the use of mobile stroke units (MSU) is required to support their utilization. We aimed to evaluate the causal effect of the use of an MSU compared with a standard ambulance on hospitalization costs and 90- to 180-day health outcomes. METHODS: Causal effect estimation was performed using patient-level data from a cohort of patients with stroke in 2018 identified from the Australian Stroke Clinical Registry (Victoria) and Melbourne MSU. These data were linked to Ambulance Victoria and government-held administrative data sets. In total, linked data from 8657 patients were available. Propensity score matching was used to define comparator groups within a target trial framework. Costs included emergency department and hospital admission costs in the first 180 days after stroke. Multivariable regression analyses of the matched data were used to compare costs and outcomes (mortality and modified Rankin Scale) between MSU and standard ambulance groups. RESULTS: The target trial sample included 96 patients transported by the MSU (intervention) and 198 patients transported by standard ambulance services (control). Of these, the mean age was 76 years and 157 (53%) were men. A greater proportion of patients received mechanical thrombectomy in the intervention group than the control group (40% versus 23%; P<0.001). The adjusted hospital costs were $17 949 greater in the intervention group than the control group (95% CI, $4682-$31 214; P=0.01). Patients in intervention group doubled the odds of achieving nondisability (modified Rankin Scale scores of 0-1, adjusted odds ratio of 2.11 [95% CI, 1.07-4.181) and halved the mortality rate (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.32-0.8 61) within 90 to 180 days poststroke compared with the control group. CONCLUSIONS: There are important cost implications and improved outcomes from using the MSU that are likely related to increased provision of reperfusion therapy.
引用
收藏
页码:948 / 956
页数:9
相关论文
共 6 条
  • [1] The Cost Effectiveness of Mobile Stroke Unit Compared to the Standard Care Ambulance in the United States
    Sriudomporn, Salin
    Nugraha, Ryan R.
    Ahuja, Nishtha
    Drabo, Emmanuel
    CIRCULATION, 2019, 140
  • [2] Evaluation of the Melbourne Mobile Stroke Unit Using Data Linkage
    Cadilhac, Dominique A.
    Birhanu, Mulugeta
    Zhao, Henry
    Coote, Skye
    Easton, Damien
    Campbell, Bruce
    Langenberg, Francesca
    Davis, Stephen
    Donnan, Geoffrey
    Churilov, Leonid
    Kim, Joosup
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STROKE, 2023, 18 (02) : 30 - 30
  • [3] Benefits of Stroke Treatment Using a Mobile Stroke Unit Compared With Standard Management The BEST-MSU Study Run-In Phase
    Bowry, Ritvij
    Parker, Stephanie
    Rajan, Suja S.
    Yamal, Jose-Miguel
    Wu, Tzu-Ching
    Richardson, Laura
    Noser, Elizabeth
    Persse, David
    Jackson, Kamilah
    Grotta, James C.
    STROKE, 2015, 46 (12) : 3370 - 3374
  • [4] SHORT-TERM COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF USING MOBILE STROKE UNIT VS. STANDARD AMBULANCE FOR PATIENTS WITH SUSPECTED STROKE
    Sangha, K.
    White, T.
    Malhotra, A.
    Boltyenkov, A.
    Katz, J. M.
    Sanelli, P. C.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2022, 25 (07) : S344 - S344
  • [5] Chest infection within 30 days of acute stroke, associated factors, survival and the benefits of stroke unit care: Analysis using linked data from the Australian Stroke Clinical Registry
    Chapman, Chantelle
    Cadilhac, Dominique A.
    Morgan, Prue
    Kilkenny, Monique F.
    Grimley, Rohan
    Sundararajan, Vijaya
    Purvis, Tara
    Johnston, Trisha
    Lannin, Natasha A.
    Andrew, Nadine E.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STROKE, 2020, 15 (04) : 390 - 398
  • [6] Efficacy of rivaroxaban compared to standard of care in preventing ischemic stroke in adults with coronary or peripheral vascular disease: an integrated analysis using patient-level data
    Barnathan, E. S.
    Deng, H.
    Sun, X.
    Dong, X.
    La Police, D.
    Suh, E.
    Yuan, Z.
    Berlin, J. A.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2020, 41 : 2421 - 2421