Assessment of Perioperative Transfusion Risk for Benign Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy Utilizing the ACS-NSQIP

被引:0
|
作者
Ashmore, Sarah [1 ]
Shi, Jinxuan [1 ]
Collins, Sarah [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Sect Urogynecol & Reconstruct Pelv Surg, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
关键词
Benign hysterectomy; Minimally invasive hysterectomy; Perioperative transfusion; Preoperative laboratory testing; Preoperative testing;
D O I
10.1007/s00192-025-06113-1
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Introduction and Hypothesis Routine preoperative laboratory testing is commonly required prior to minimally invasive hysterectomy (MIH) for pelvic organ prolapse (POP), despite limited evidence for its clinical value. We aim to identify transfusion risk for MIH for POP compared with other benign indications. Methods Using the 2014 to 2021 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Gynecology Participant Use Data File, we performed a retrospective cohort study to determine the risk of perioperative blood transfusion following MIH for benign indications. MIH were identified using CPT codes, and surgical indications were classified according to ICD-9 and -10 codes. Gynecological malignancy risk-reducing indications were categorized as prophylactic. Hysterectomy routes included total laparoscopic hysterectomy, laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy, laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy, and vaginal hysterectomy. Hysterectomies for malignancy were excluded. Perioperative transfusions were defined as those given intraoperatively or within 30 days postoperatively. Results A total of 282,124 patients underwent MIH for benign gynecological indications. Patients undergoing MIH for POP compared with other benign indications were older, had lower BMI, and were less likely to currently smoke (p < 0.001). Overall transfusion rate for benign MIH was 1.2%, and transfusion rates differed significantly by surgical indication (p < 0.001). Patients undergoing MIH for POP had a low rate of transfusion (0.7%) compared with other benign indications such as anemia (15.9%), fibroids (1.8%), and menstrual disorders (1.5%). Conclusions Patients undergoing surgery for POP had significantly lower rates of transfusion than those with other benign indications. Aggressive preoperative precautions, including laboratory testing and redundant intravenous access, are likely excessive in this population.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Trends and Perioperative Outcomes across Elective Benign Hysterectomy Procedures from the ACS-NSQIP 2007-2017
    Tyan, Paul
    Hawa, Nadim
    Carey, Erin
    Urbina, Princess
    Chen, Frank R.
    Sparks, Andrew
    Amdur, Richard
    Moawad, Gaby
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 29 (03) : 365 - +
  • [2] Assessing perioperative risk for minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy: how accurate is the ACS NSQIP calculator?
    Christensen, K.
    Mckevitt, M.
    Gaigbe-Togbe, B.
    Sarker, M.
    Hardart, A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2024, 230 (04) : S1240 - S1241
  • [3] Effect of Perioperative Transfusion on Postoperative Morbidity Following Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy for Benign Indications
    Tyan, Paul
    Taher, Ali
    Carey, Erin
    Amdur, Richard
    Messersmith, Cole
    Robinson, Hannah N.
    Gu, Alex
    Vargas, Maria V.
    Moawad, Gaby N.
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 27 (01) : 200 - 205
  • [4] Safety of Abdominoplasty with Concomitant Abdominal or Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy: An ACS NSQIP Study
    Mou, Tsung
    Das, Deepanjana
    Brown, Oluwateniola
    Lewicky-Gaupp, Christina
    Kenton, Kimberly S.
    Bretschneider, Carol Emi
    AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2022, 46 (04) : 1724 - 1730
  • [5] Minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy: a matched analysis using ACS-NSQIP
    Adams, Alexandra M.
    Russell, Dylan M.
    Carpenter, Elizabeth L.
    Nelson, Daniel W.
    Yheulon, Christopher G.
    Vreeland, Timothy J.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2023, 37 (01): : 617 - 623
  • [6] Safety of Abdominoplasty with Concomitant Abdominal or Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy: An ACS NSQIP Study
    Tsung Mou
    Deepanjana Das
    Oluwateniola Brown
    Christina Lewicky-Gaupp
    Kimberly S. Kenton
    Carol Emi Bretschneider
    Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 2022, 46 : 1724 - 1730
  • [7] Minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy: a matched analysis using ACS-NSQIP
    Alexandra M. Adams
    Dylan M. Russell
    Elizabeth L. Carpenter
    Daniel W. Nelson
    Christopher G. Yheulon
    Timothy J. Vreeland
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2023, 37 : 617 - 623
  • [8] Impact of body mass index on minimally invasive ventral hernia repair: an ACS-NSQIP analysis
    Owei, L.
    Swendiman, R. A.
    Torres-Landa, S.
    Dempsey, D. T.
    Dumon, K. R.
    HERNIA, 2019, 23 (05) : 899 - 907
  • [9] Impact of body mass index on minimally invasive ventral hernia repair: an ACS-NSQIP analysis
    L. Owei
    R. A. Swendiman
    S. Torres-Landa
    D. T. Dempsey
    K. R. Dumon
    Hernia, 2019, 23 : 899 - 907
  • [10] Predictors and implications of unplanned conversion during minimally invasive hepatectomy: an analysis of the ACS-NSQIP database
    Stiles, Zachary E.
    Behrman, Stephen W.
    Glazer, Evan S.
    Deneve, Jeremiah L.
    Dong, Lei
    Wan, Jim Y.
    Dickson, Paxton V.
    HPB, 2017, 19 (11) : 957 - 965