Characterization and Comparison of Volatile Compounds of Cage, Organic and Free-Range Systems Eggs

被引:0
|
作者
Yenilmez, F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cukurova Univ, Vocat Sch Tufanbeyli, Adana, Turkiye
关键词
Cage systems; Free-range systems; Odor compounds; Organic systems; SPME-GC-MS; ELECTRONIC NOSE; PREFERENCES; YOLK; CONSUMERS; GC/MS;
D O I
10.1590/1806-9061-2023-1872
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Studies on consumer preferences show that eggs obtained in open areas such as free-range systems and organic systems have superior taste than cage chicken eggs. Moreover, it is emphasized that the odor characteristics of eggs obtained in different production systems are different, and this reveals the necessity of determining the relevant volatile compounds. This study aimed to characterize and compare the volatile compounds responsible for the taste and aroma of eggs obtained from cage, organic and free-range systems. 60 randomly selected eggs (20 from each group sample) were analyzed by the SPME-GC-MS device. Eight volatile compounds were detected in the free-range chicken eggs, 15 in the caged chicken eggs, and 11 in the organic chicken eggs. D-limonene and 2-Butanamine, 3,3-dimethyl- compounds were determined as the main volatile odor components in all three groups of chicken eggs. Alkanes, esters, amines, acids, alcohols, ketones, aldehydes and alkenes were determined among the volatile compound groups. Acid and aldehyde groups of volatile compounds were not detected in the free-range and organic chicken eggs, as well as the ester group in free-range chicken eggs. In this study, both volatile compound numbers and compound groups of eggs belonging to different production systems were found to be different. This causes the eggs to differ in taste and aroma
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Free-range eggs?
    McLaren, Anne
    SCIENCE, 2007, 316 (5823) : 339 - 339
  • [2] Free-range eggs no longer available
    Loeb, Josh
    VETERINARY RECORD, 2022, 190 (07) : 262 - 262
  • [3] PHYSICAL-CHEMICAL QUALITY OF LAYING EGGS OF CONVENTIONAL SYSTEM, CAGE-FREE AND FREE-RANGE
    Saccomani, A. P. O.
    Moraes, J. E.
    Reis, T. L.
    Ganeco, A. G.
    Thimoteo, M.
    Borba, H.
    Calixto, L. F. L.
    Pizzolante, C. C.
    BOLETIM DE INDUSTRIA ANIMAL, 2019, 76
  • [4] Breaking niche sustainable products into the mainstream: Organic milk and free-range eggs
    Chintakayala, Phani Kumar
    Young, William
    Barkemeyer, Ralf
    Morris, Michelle A.
    BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 27 (07) : 1039 - 1051
  • [5] The greenhouse emissions footprint of free-range eggs
    Taylor, R. C.
    Omed, H.
    Edwards-Jones, G.
    POULTRY SCIENCE, 2014, 93 (01) : 231 - 237
  • [6] Quality of eggs from hens kept in two different free-range systems in comparison with a barn system
    Krawczyk, Jozefa
    Gornowicz, Ewa
    ARCHIV FUR GEFLUGELKUNDE, 2010, 74 (03): : 151 - 157
  • [7] Free-range use and intestinal parasites in organic/ free-range laying hens
    Bestman, Monique
    van Niekerk, Thea
    Goransson, Lina
    Ferrante, Valentina
    Gunnarsson, Stefan
    Grilli, Guido
    Arndt, Saskia S.
    Rodenburg, T. Bas
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED POULTRY RESEARCH, 2023, 32 (02):
  • [8] COMPARISON OF FREE-RANGE, BARN AND CAGED HENS' EGGS COMMERCIALLY AVAILABLE IN LATVIA
    Kirse-Ozolina, Asnate
    FOODBALT 2019: 13TH BALTIC CONFERENCE ON FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY: "FOOD. NUTRITION. WELL-BEING.", 2019, : 55 - 60
  • [9] Differing opinions on organic and free-range farming systems - Response
    Kelly, Alan M.
    Emeritus, Gilbert S. Kahn Dean
    Marshak, Robert R.
    Emeritus, Dean
    JAVMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2008, 232 (05): : 677 - 678
  • [10] Microbiological vulnerability of eggs and environmental conditions in conventional and free-range housing systems
    Galvao, Julia Arantes
    Biondo, Alexander Welker
    Possebon, Fabio Sossai
    Belem Spina, Thiago Luiz
    Nunes Correia, Leticia Borges
    Zuim, Caio Vaciloto
    Pereira Guerra Filho, Joao Bosco
    Figueiredo Pantoja, Jose Carlos
    de Almeida Nogueira Pinto, Jose Paes
    SEMINA-CIENCIAS AGRARIAS, 2018, 39 (01): : 133 - 141