Medical abortion in Ghana: A non-randomized, non-inferiority study of access through pharmacies compared with clinics

被引:1
|
作者
Kapp, Nathalie [1 ]
Bawah, Ayaga A. [2 ]
Agula, Caesar [2 ]
Menzel, Jamie L. [1 ]
Antobam, Samuel K. [2 ]
Asuming, Patrick O. [3 ]
Eckersberger, Elisabeth [1 ]
Pearson, Erin E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ipas, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
[2] Univ Ghana, Reg Inst Populat Studies RIPS, Accra, Ghana
[3] Univ Ghana, Business Sch UGBS, Accra, Ghana
关键词
Abortion; Abortion self-care; Medical abortion; Mifepristone; Misoprostol; Pharmacy provision; EFFICACY; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110538
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objectives: To compare self-reported clinical outcomes following medical abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol sourced from either a pharmacy or health clinic. Study design: We conducted a prospective, non-randomized, non-inferiority cohort study across four regions in Ghana, from high-volume pharmacies and health clinics. Participants seeking medical abortion (less than nine weeks' gestation) who met usual medical abortion eligibility criteria were recruited. Data collection included baseline surveys, follow-up phone interviews, and self-reported assessments of medical abortion outcomes. The study aimed to enroll 2000 medical abortion users (1000 from each source). Results: Complete outcome data was available and analyzed from 1958 participants (of 2208 enrolled), with the adjusted risk difference of need for additional treatment to complete the abortion indicating noninferiority of the pharmacy group compared to the clinic group [-2.3% (95% CI -5.3% to 0.7%)]. Both groups reported low rates of additional treatment (4.9%) and adhered similarly to the abortion regimen. Secondary outcomes showed no significant differences, with moderate acceptability in both groups (65.4% pharmacy, 52.3% facility). Adverse outcomes were rare: one ectopic pregnancy, one blood transfusion and no deaths or other major complications were reported. Conclusions: Accessing medical abortion pills directly from pharmacies without prior consultation from a provider demonstrated non-inferior self-reported clinical outcomes compared to seeking care from health clinics. The findings align with the growing global evidence supporting the safety and effectiveness of medical abortion self-care. Implications: This study contributes data which support future registration of over-the-counter use of medical abortion drugs up to nine weeks' gestation. Such measures could expand options for safe abortion care, especially in regions where unsafe abortion poses a substantial maternal health risk. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03727308). (c) 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effectiveness and safety of early medication abortion provided in pharmacies by auxiliary nurse-midwives: A non-inferiority study in Nepal
    Rocca, Corinne H.
    Puri, Mahesh
    Shrestha, Prabhakar
    Blum, Maya
    Maharjan, Dev
    Grossman, Daniel
    Regmi, Kiran
    Darney, Philip D.
    Harper, Cynthia C.
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (01):
  • [2] A prospective, non-randomized study of home use of mifepristone for medical abortion in the US
    Chong, Erica
    Frye, Laura J.
    Castle, Jen
    Dean, Gillian
    Kuehl, Laurel
    Winikoff, Beverly
    CONTRACEPTION, 2015, 92 (03) : 215 - 219
  • [3] Nurse versus physician-provision of early medical abortion in Mexico: a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial
    Diaz Olavarrieta, Claudia
    Ganatra, Bela
    Sorhaindo, Annik
    Karver, Tahilin S.
    Seuc, Armando
    Villalobos, Aremis
    Garcia, Sandra G.
    Perez, Martha
    Bousieguez, Manuel
    Sanhueza, Patricio
    BULLETIN OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION, 2015, 93 (04) : 249 - 258
  • [4] Videoconferencing Psychotherapy for Panic Disorder and Agoraphobia: Outcome and Treatment Processes From a Non-randomized Non-inferiority Trial
    Bouchard, Stephane
    Allard, Micheline
    Robillard, Genevieve
    Dumoulin, Stephanie
    Guitard, Tanya
    Loranger, Claudie
    Green-Demers, Isabelle
    Marchand, Andre
    Renaud, Patrice
    Cournoyer, Louis-Georges
    Corno, Giulia
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 11
  • [5] Sample sizes for a non-inferiority study to compare medical devices
    Wilkes, A. R.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2007, 98 (02) : 292P - 293P
  • [6] ADULT INTRAOSSEOUS ACCESS BY ADVANCED EMTs: A STATEWIDE NON-INFERIORITY STUDY
    Wolfson, Daniel L.
    Tandoh, Margaret A.
    Jindal, Mohit
    Forgione, Patrick M.
    Harder, Valerie S.
    PREHOSPITAL EMERGENCY CARE, 2017, 21 (01) : 7 - 13
  • [7] Response re: A non-inferiority randomized controlled trial to compare transabdominal and transvaginal sonography for eligibility assessment prior to medical abortion
    Fu, Annie
    Weber, Caitlin E.
    Davis, Anne R.
    Gilmore, Emma
    Hirsch, Gregory
    Westhoff, Carolyn L.
    CONTRACEPTION, 2019, 99 (06) : 378 - 378
  • [8] Non-inferiority of low-dose compared to standard high-dose calcium supplementation in pregnancy: study protocol for two randomized, parallel group, non-inferiority trials in India and Tanzania
    Pratibha Dwarkanath
    Alfa Muhihi
    Christopher R. Sudfeld
    Shobha Rani
    Christopher P. Duggan
    Mary M. Sando
    Blair J. Wylie
    Ryan Fernandez
    Shabani Kinyogoli
    Cristina Munk
    Nandita Perumal
    John Michael Raj
    Nirmala Buggi
    Ndeniria Swai
    Tinku Thomas
    Molin Wang
    Anura V. Kurpad
    Honorati Masanja
    Andreas B. Pembe
    Wafaie W. Fawzi
    Trials, 22
  • [9] Non-inferiority of low-dose compared to standard high-dose calcium supplementation in pregnancy: study protocol for two randomized, parallel group, non-inferiority trials in India and Tanzania
    Dwarkanath, Pratibha
    Muhihi, Alfa
    Sudfeld, Christopher R.
    Rani, Shobha
    Duggan, Christopher P.
    Sando, Mary M.
    Wylie, Blair J.
    Fernandez, Ryan
    Kinyogoli, Shabani
    Munk, Cristina
    Perumal, Nandita
    Raj, John Michael
    Buggi, Nirmala
    Swai, Ndeniria
    Thomas, Tinku
    Wang, Molin
    Kurpad, Anura V.
    Masanja, Honorati
    Pembe, Andreas B.
    Fawzi, Wafaie W.
    TRIALS, 2021, 22 (01)
  • [10] Propofol versus midazolam for conscious sedation in medical thoracoscopy: A randomized non-inferiority trial
    Grendelmeier, Peter
    Pflimlin, Eric
    Tamm, Michael
    Stolz, Daiana
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2013, 42