Long-term reductions in acute headache medication use after eptinezumab treatment in patients with migraine and prior preventive treatment failures: Post hoc analysis of the DELIVER randomized trial

被引:0
|
作者
Gryglas-Dworak, Anna [1 ,6 ]
Schim, Jack [2 ]
Ettrup, Anders [3 ]
Boserup, Line Pickering [3 ]
Josiassen, Mette Krog [3 ]
Ranc, Kristina [3 ]
Sperling, Bjrn [3 ]
Ashina, Messoud [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] MIGRE Polish Migraine Ctr, Wroclaw, Poland
[2] Neurol Ctr Southern Calif, Carlsbad, CA USA
[3] H Lundbeck & Co AS, Copenhagen, Denmark
[4] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Neurol, Danish Headache Ctr, Hosp Rigshosp, Copenhagen, Denmark
[5] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Clin Med, Copenhagen, Denmark
[6] MIGRE Polish Migraine Ctr, Lubinowa 12-7,52-210, PL-52210 Wroclaw, Poland
来源
HEADACHE | 2025年 / 65卷 / 01期
关键词
anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide; eptinezumab; medication overuse; migraine; preventive treatment; OVERUSE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To evaluate long-term reductions in acute headache medication (AHM) use with eptinezumab versus placebo in patients with prior preventive migraine treatment failures and medication overuse (MO). Background: Preventive migraine treatment is recommended for patients for whom AHMs have failed and for those who are using excessive amounts of AHM. MO may worsen headache and migraine symptoms in people with migraine; it is a risk factor for disease chronification and/or MO headache. Methods: DELIVER was a multicenter, parallel-group, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3b clinical trial that randomized adults with migraine and two to four prior preventive failures to eptinezumab 100 mg, 300 mg, or placebo infusion every 12weeks; patients initially given placebo received eptinezumab 100 mg or 300 mg in the extension period. MO was defined according to diagnostic criteria for MO headache in the baseline diary reports. This post hoc analysis of the DELIVER study included change from baseline in AHM days/month of use (ergotamines, triptans, simple or combination analgesics, and opioids; total and select class-specific use) in the MO population. Results: A total of 890 patients were included in the total population, and 438/890 (49.2%) had MO at baseline. In both the total population and MO population, eptinezumab resulted in greater reductions in total AHM days/month of use during weeks 1-24 than placebo, with triptans showing the largest reduction among AHM classes. Patients switching from placebo to eptinezumab experienced reductions in AHM days/month similar to that of initial eptinezumab treatment. In the extension population, mean (standard error [SE]) changes from baseline in AHM days/month were -4.6 (0.32; 100 mg) and -4.8 (0.32; 300 mg) across weeks 1-4 in patients who received eptinezumab for the entire treatment period and were -4.8 (0.44; placebo-100 mg) and -5.5 (0.44; placebo-300 mg) across weeks 25-28 in patients who switched from placebo to eptinezumab. Mean (SE) changes from baseline in AHM days/month in the extension MO population were -6.5 (0.59; 100 mg) and -6.6 (0.57; 300 mg) across weeks 1-4 in patients who received eptinezumab for the entire treatment period and were -7.1 (0.81; 100 mg) and-8.0 (0.80; 300 mg) across weeks 25-28 in patients who were switched from placebo to eptinezumab. All treatment arms sustained or further reduced AHM use across 18 months of trial participation. Across weeks 1-4, in patients fulfilling criteria for MO at baseline, 68.0% (102/150) of patients treated with eptinezumab 100 mg and 74.7% (109/146) of patients treated with eptinezumab 300 mg reported AHM use below MO thresholds compared to 43.3% (61/141) of patients receiving placebo. In patients with MO at baseline, the proportion of patients without MO remained above 60.0% for all treatment groups during the extension period. Conclusions: Eptinezumab reduced total AHM use more than placebo in patients with prior preventive failures and in patients with MO at baseline; largest reductions were observed for triptans. Robust reductions in AHM use after eptinezumab were sustained or further reduced with up to 18 months of treatment, and most patients no longer met thresholds for MO. Plain Language Summary Using too many pain-relief medications to treat migraine attacks can make migraine and overall quality of life worse. This study looked at whether eptinezumab, a preventive migraine treatment, could reduce the need for these pain-relief medications in people with migraine who use a lot of pain medications and have not had success with previous preventive treatments. We found that eptinezumab improved quality of life and lowered the use of pain-relief medication more than placebo, and these effects were maintained for up to 18 months of treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:101 / 112
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Long-term reductions in acute headache medication use after eptinezumab treatment in patients with prior preventive treatment failures
    Gryglas-Dworak, A.
    Schim, J.
    Ettrup, A.
    Boserup, L. P.
    Josiassen, M. K.
    Ranc, K.
    Sperling, B.
    Ashina, M.
    JOURNAL OF HEADACHE AND PAIN, 2024, 25
  • [2] Long-term reductions in acute headache medication use after eptinezumab treatment in patients with prior preventive treatment failures
    Gryglas-Dworak, Anna
    Schim, Jack
    Ettrup, Anders
    Boserup, Line Pickering
    Josiassen, Mette Krog
    Ranc, Kristina
    Sperling, Bjorn
    Ashina, Messoud
    CEPHALALGIA, 2023, 43 (1supp) : 46 - 47
  • [3] Long-term effectiveness of eptinezumab in patients with migraine and prior preventive treatment failures: extension of a randomized controlled trial
    Messoud Ashina
    Stewart J. Tepper
    Astrid Gendolla
    Bjørn Sperling
    Anders Ettrup
    Mette Krog Josiassen
    Amaal J. Starling
    The Journal of Headache and Pain, 24
  • [4] Long-term effectiveness of eptinezumab in patients with migraine and prior preventive treatment failures: extension of a randomized controlled trial
    Ashina, Messoud
    Tepper, Stewart J.
    Gendolla, Astrid
    Sperling, Bjorn
    Ettrup, Anders
    Josiassen, Mette Krog
    Starling, Amaal J.
    JOURNAL OF HEADACHE AND PAIN, 2023, 24 (01):
  • [5] Long-term effectiveness of eptinezumab in patients with prior preventive migraine treatment failures
    Ashina, M.
    Tepper, S.
    Gendolla, A.
    Sperling, B.
    Ettrup, A.
    Josiassen, M.
    Starling, A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2023, 30 : 372 - 372
  • [6] Long-term effectiveness of eptinezumab in patients with prior preventive migraine treatment failures
    Starling, A.
    Ashina, M.
    Tepper, S.
    Gendolla, A.
    Sperling, B.
    Ettrup, A.
    Josiassen, M.
    HEADACHE, 2023, 63 : 144 - 145
  • [7] Responder rates with eptinezumab over 24 weeks in patients with prior preventive migraine treatment failures: post hoc analysis of the DELIVER randomized clinical trial
    Ashina, Messoud
    Lipton, Richard B.
    Ailani, Jessica
    Versijpt, Jan
    Sacco, Simona
    Mitsikostas, Dimos D.
    Christoffersen, Cecilie Laurberg
    Sperling, Bjorn
    Ettrup, Anders
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2024, 31 (02)
  • [8] Long-term safety and effectiveness of eptinezumab in patients with prior preventive migraine treatment failures
    Ashina, Messoud
    Tepper, Stewart J.
    Gendolla, Astrid
    Sperling, Bjorn
    Ettrup, Anders
    Josiassen, Mette Krog
    Starling, Amaal J.
    CEPHALALGIA, 2023, 43 (1supp) : 45 - 45
  • [9] Long-term safety and effectiveness of eptinezumab in patients with prior preventive migraine treatment failures
    Ashina, M.
    Tepper, S. J.
    Gendolla, A.
    Sperling, B.
    Ettrup, A.
    Josiassen, M. K.
    Starling, A. J.
    JOURNAL OF HEADACHE AND PAIN, 2024, 25
  • [10] Eptinezumab demonstrated efficacy regardless of prior preventive migraine treatment failure: Post hoc DELIVER analyses
    Pozo-Rosich, Patricia
    Ashina, Messoud
    Tepper, Stewart J.
    Jensen, Sidsel
    Boserup, Line Pickering
    Josiassen, Mette Krog
    Sperling, Bjorn
    CEPHALALGIA, 2023, 43 (1supp) : 227 - 227