Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty Achieves Minimal Clinically Important Difference Faster Than Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty

被引:1
|
作者
Lim, Perry L. [1 ,2 ]
Kumar, Arun R. [1 ,2 ]
Melnic, Christopher M. [1 ,2 ]
Bedair, Hany S. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Med Sch, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Boston, MA USA
[2] Newton Wellesley Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Newton, MA USA
来源
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY | 2025年 / 40卷 / 03期
关键词
total knee arthroplasty; MCID; PROM; primary; revision; TOTAL JOINT ARTHROPLASTY; FINANCIAL BURDEN; OUTCOMES; PROMIS; HIP;
D O I
10.1016/j.arth.2024.08.038
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) remains underexplored regarding patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), particularly in terms of time to reach minimal clinically important difference (MCID). This study addresses this gap by comparing the time to achieve MCID between primary TKA (pTKA) and rTKA patients, providing valuable insights into their recovery trajectories. Methods: A total of 8,266 TKAs (7,618 pTKA and 648 rTKA) were retrospectively studied in a multi-institutional arthroplasty registry. Patients who completed the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) global physical, PROMIS physical function short form 10a (PF-10a), and knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score physical function short form (KOOS-PS) questionnaires were identified by Current Procedural Terminology codes. Survival curves with and without interval censoring were utilized to evaluate the time to achieve MCID. Results: Comparing the time to achieve MCID, rTKAs were significantly faster than pTKA for PROMIS global physical (3.5 versus 3.7 months, P = 0.004) and KOOS-PS (3.3 versus 4.2 months, P < 0.001), but similar for PROMIS PF-10a (4.4 versus 4.8 months, P = 0.057). Interval censoring also showed similar trends with earlier times to achieve MCID for rTKAs for PROMIS global physical (0.6 to 0.61 versus 0.97 to 0.97 months, P = 0.009) and KOOS-PS (0.97 to 0.97 versus 1.47 to 1.47 months, P < 0.001), but not for PROMIS PF-10a (2.43 to 2.54 versus 1.90 to 1.91 months, P = 0.92). Conclusions: The present study revealed that the time to achieve MCID was faster in patients undergoing rTKA compared to those undergoing pTKA. These findings allow surgeons to reassure preoperative rTKA patients that their recovery to a MCID postoperatively may be quicker than expected, especially when compared to their initial recovery after primary TKA. Level of Evidence: Level III. (c) 2024 Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:732 / 737
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Letter regarding "Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty Achieves Minimal Clinically Important Difference Faster than Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty"
    Riddle, Daniel L.
    Dumenci, Levent
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2025, 40 (03):
  • [2] Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Achieves Minimal Clinically Important Difference Faster than Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Lim, Perry L.
    Wang, Kevin Y.
    Bedair, Hany S.
    Melnic, Christopher M.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2025, 40 (04): : 941 - 947
  • [3] The oxford knee score minimal clinically important difference for revision total knee arthroplasty
    Khow, Yong Zhi
    Liow, Ming Han Lincoln
    Goh, Graham S.
    Chen, Jerry Yongqiang
    Lo, Ngai Nung
    Yeo, Seng Jin
    KNEE, 2021, 32 : 211 - 217
  • [4] Defining the minimal clinically important difference for the knee society score following revision total knee arthroplasty
    Yong Zhi Khow
    Ming Han Lincoln Liow
    Graham S. Goh
    Jerry Yongqiang Chen
    Ngai Nung Lo
    Seng Jin Yeo
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2022, 30 : 2744 - 2752
  • [5] Defining the minimal clinically important difference for the knee society score following revision total knee arthroplasty
    Khow, Yong Zhi
    Liow, Ming Han Lincoln
    Goh, Graham S.
    Chen, Jerry Yongqiang
    Lo, Ngai Nung
    Yeo, Seng Jin
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2022, 30 (08) : 2744 - 2752
  • [6] Minimal Clinically Important Difference in Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Versus Standard Manual Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Shaw, Jonathan H.
    Lindsay-Rivera, Kevin G.
    Buckley, Patrick J.
    Weir, Robb M.
    Banka, Trevor R.
    Davis, Jason J.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2021, 36 (07): : S233 - S241
  • [7] Revision of Minimal Resection Resurfacing Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty to Total Knee Arthroplasty Results Compared With Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty
    O'Donnell, Turlough M. P.
    Abouazza, Omar
    Neil, Michael J.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2013, 28 (01): : 33 - 39
  • [8] The minimal clinically important difference for Knee Society Clinical Rating System after total knee arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis
    Wu Chean Lee
    Yu Heng Kwan
    Hwei Chi Chong
    Seng Jin Yeo
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2017, 25 : 3354 - 3359
  • [9] The minimal clinically important difference for Knee Society Clinical Rating System after total knee arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis
    Lee, Wu Chean
    Kwan, Yu Heng
    Chong, Hwei Chi
    Yeo, Seng Jin
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2017, 25 (11) : 3354 - 3359
  • [10] Revision of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Versus Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Craik, Johnathan D.
    El Shafie, Sherif A.
    Singh, Vinay K.
    Twyman, Roy S.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2015, 30 (04): : 592 - 594