共 50 条
Comparative analysis of real-world data on the efficacy and safety of and adherence to ICS/LABA combinations in asthma management
被引:0
|作者:
Park, Hee Sun
[1
]
Lee, Jungkuk
[2
]
Kim, Hasung
[2
]
Woo, Seong-Dae
[1
]
机构:
[1] Chungnam Natl Univ, Dept Pulm Allergy & Crit Care Med, Sch Med, Daejeon, South Korea
[2] Hanmi Pharm Co Ltd, Data Sci Team, Seoul, South Korea
关键词:
Adherence;
Asthma;
Efficacy and safety;
ICS/LABA combinations;
Inhaler types;
Real-world outcomes;
METERED-DOSE INHALER;
DEVICES;
CORTICOSTEROIDS;
SALMETEROL;
FORMOTEROL;
D O I:
10.1186/s12931-024-03084-7
中图分类号:
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Background Choosing effective devices (inhaled corticosteroid [ICS]-long-acting beta 2 agonist [LABA] combination inhalers) as maintenance treatment is critical for managing patients with asthma. We aimed to compare ICS/LABA combination efficacy, safety, and adherence across inhaler types and components in patients newly diagnosed with asthma. Methods Utilizing South Korea's National Health Insurance Service data, we conducted a population-based cohort study involving patients aged 18-80 years, newly diagnosed with asthma who received ICS/LABA combination therapy between January 2016 and December 2020. Outcomes assessed included treatment adherence, asthma exacerbations, hospitalizations, emergency-department visits, mortality, and safety outcomes within 3-month and 1-year post-index periods. Results Overall, 13,850 eligible patients were included, with subgroups categorized and compared according to inhaler type and component (metered dose inhalers [MDIs] vs. dry powder inhalers [DPIs], budesonide vs. fluticasone, and formoterol vs. salmeterol). Efficacy and safety profiles did not significantly differ across device types or ICS/LABA combination components during the 3-month and 1-year follow-up periods. However, the DPI group exhibited a significantly higher mean proportion of days covered (0.67 +/- 0.23 vs. 0.62 +/- 0.23; P < 0.001) and a lower risk of discontinuation (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.867; 95% confidence interval, 0.804-0.927; P < 0.001) than did the MDI group, with no significant differences observed between the other subgroups. Conclusions The choice of inhaler device (MDI vs. DPI) and specific ICS/LABA combination components does not significantly impact efficacy and safety profiles in patients newly diagnosed with asthma. However, DPI use may be associated with improved adherence. These results provide valuable insights for clinicians in selecting appropriate and individually tailored inhaler therapies in real-world settings.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文