Model Checking of Rewards and Penalties in Beacon Chain

被引:0
|
作者
Afzaal, Hamra [1 ]
Zafar, Nazir Ahmad [1 ]
Tehseen, Aqsa [2 ]
Kousar, Shaheen [2 ]
机构
[1] COMSATS Univ Islamabad, Dept Comp Sci, Sahiwal, Pakistan
[2] Informat Technol Univ Punjab, Dept Comp Sci, Lahore 54600, Pakistan
关键词
Beacon Chain; Ethereum; 2.0; Rewards and penalties; Model checking; PAT; BLOCKCHAIN;
D O I
10.1007/s44227-024-00050-z
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Ethereum 2.0 Beacon Chain has adopted the Proof of Stake (PoS) consensus mechanism to significantly advance the security, scalability, and decentralization of blockchain technology. It has played an integral role in organizing validator operations and addressing scalability issues. The Beacon Chain's rewards and penalty system incentivizes honest behavior and penalizes dishonest actors inside the network. Ensuring the correctness of this mechanism is paramount for guaranteeing the system's integrity. Therefore, this work formally verifies the rewards and penalty mechanism in the Beacon Chain using model checking, a formal methods-based technique. The formal specification of the rewards and penalties processes and several other epoch operations are described using the Communicating Sequential Programs (CSP#) language. The properties for rewards and penalties procedures are specified with Linear Temporal Logic (LTL). The Process Analysis Toolkit (PAT) model checker is utilized for verifying the formal model against the properties. The PAT model checker takes the specified formal model as input and determines whether the properties are satisfied or violated. The properties are examined in terms of verification time, visited states, total transitions, and memory utilization.
引用
收藏
页数:32
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Penalties, rewards, and inspection: provisions for quality in supply chain contracts
    Starbird, SA
    JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2001, 52 (01) : 109 - 115
  • [2] An Evaluation Model with Effect of Rewards and Penalties Based on Vague Sets
    Zhang, Guoxin
    Guan, Yunjun
    2014 SEVENTH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND DESIGN (ISCID 2014), VOL 1, 2014, : 104 - 107
  • [3] REWARDS AND PENALTIES FOR SUPPLIERS OF EQUIPMENT
    PASSEY, RDC
    AERONAUTICAL JOURNAL, 1976, 80 (787): : 303 - 312
  • [4] Rewards and penalties of monitoring the earth
    Keeling, CD
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 1998, 23 : 25 - 82
  • [5] THE GREATEST REWARDS AND THE HEAVIEST PENALTIES
    AREEN, J
    HUMAN GENE THERAPY, 1992, 3 (03) : 277 - 278
  • [6] Model checking Markov reward models with impulse rewards
    Cloth, L
    Katoen, JP
    Khattri, M
    Pulungan, R
    2005 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DEPENDABLE SYSTEMS AND NETWORKS, PROCEEDINGS, 2005, : 722 - 731
  • [7] Rewards and penalties in an evolutionary game theoretic model of international environmental agreements
    Luqman, Muhammad
    Soytas, Ugur
    Li, Yafei
    Ahmad, Najid
    ECONOMIC RESEARCH-EKONOMSKA ISTRAZIVANJA, 2022, 35 (01): : 602 - 621
  • [8] Extended Oligopolies with Pollution Penalties and Rewards
    Matsumoto, Akio
    Szidarovszky, Ferenc
    Takizawa, Hirokazu
    DISCRETE DYNAMICS IN NATURE AND SOCIETY, 2018, 2018
  • [9] A Data Engineering Framework for Ethereum Beacon Chain Rewards: From Data Collection to Decentralization Metrics
    Yan, Tao
    Li, Shengnan
    Kraner, Benjamin
    Zhang, Luyao
    Tessone, Claudio J.
    SCIENTIFIC DATA, 2025, 12 (01)
  • [10] Consequences of mitotic failure-The penalties and the rewards
    Storchova, Zuzana
    SEMINARS IN CELL & DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY, 2021, 117 : 149 - 158