Geodesign to advance boundary work in urban planning: A study in Stockholm focused on nature-based solutions

被引:0
|
作者
Blal Adem Esmail [1 ]
Cyrus Carl Anderson [7 ]
Sigvard Bast [1 ]
Chiara Cortinovis [2 ]
Lina Suleiman [3 ]
Jarumi Kato-Huerta [4 ]
Johan Högström [5 ]
Berit Balfors [4 ]
Gustavo Arciniegas [3 ]
Davide Geneletti [3 ]
Ulla Mörtberg [6 ]
Christian Albert [4 ]
机构
[1] Ruhr University Bochum,Institute of Geography
[2] Leibniz Universität Hanover,Institute of Environmental Planning
[3] KTH Royal Institute of Technology,Department of Sustainable Development, Environmental Science and Engineering
[4] University of Trento,Department of Civil, Environmental and Mechanical Engineering
[5] KTH Royal Institute of Technology,Department of Urban Planning and Environment
[6] Geo-Col GIS and Collaborative Planning,GLOMOS
[7] Eurac Research, Centre for Global Mountain Safeguard Research & Institute for Alpine Environment
关键词
Boundary management; Impact assessment; Knowledge co-creation; Land use change; Scenario planning; Suitability analysis;
D O I
10.1007/s13280-024-02083-8
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Geodesign supports collaborative urban planning by managing ‘boundaries’ between diverse knowledge holders. However, there is a paucity of empirical evidence of its contribution to ‘boundary work’. This paper aims to evaluate how a geodesign process facilitates knowledge co-production through boundary work and to assess the scientific credibility, political saliency, and procedural legitimacy of its outputs in urban planning. We propose a replicable geodesign framework to assess boundary work, and test it in a case study on urban transformations with nature-based solutions in the Skarpnäck district of Stockholm, Sweden. Findings indicate that all geodesign steps facilitated communication by promoting collective reasoning. Participants acknowledged contributions to knowledge co-production and decision-making by mediating between different perspectives. However, data quality and modeling simplicity were identified as critical factors affecting the outputs’ perceived credibility. Future applications should include co-designing the geodesign process, improving capacity and skills, and facilitating more integrated planning.
引用
收藏
页码:285 / 304
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Using Geodesign as a boundary management process for planning nature-based solutions in river landscapes
    Gottwald, Sarah
    Brenner, Jana
    Janssen, Ron
    Albert, Christian
    AMBIO, 2021, 50 (08) : 1477 - 1496
  • [2] Correction to: Using Geodesign as a boundary management process for planning nature-based solutions in river landscapes
    Sarah Gottwald
    Jana Brenner
    Ron Janssen
    Christian Albert
    Ambio, 2021, 50 : 1497 - 1497
  • [3] Municipal Practices for Integrated Planning of Nature-Based Solutions in Urban Development in the Stockholm Region
    Brokking, Peter
    Mortberg, Ulla
    Balfors, Berit
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (18)
  • [4] Planning the multifunctionality of nature-based solutions in urban spaces
    Alves, Alida
    van Opstal, Carlo
    Keijzer, Nout
    Sutton, Nora
    Chen, Wei-Shan
    CITIES, 2024, 146
  • [5] Urban Nature Games for integrating nature-based solutions in urban planning: A review
    Istrate, Aura-Luciana
    Hamel, Perrine
    LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2023, 239
  • [6] Dataset of urban nature games to aid integrating nature-based solutions in urban planning
    Istrate, Aura-Luciana
    Hamel, Perrine
    DATA IN BRIEF, 2023, 51
  • [7] A frame of understanding to better link nature-based solutions and urban planning
    Marusic, Barbara Golicnik
    Dremel, Manca
    Ravnikar, Ziva
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2023, 146 : 47 - 56
  • [8] Defining Natural Habitat Types as Nature-Based Solutions in Urban Planning
    Dremel, Manca
    Marusic, Barbara Golicnik
    Zelnik, Igor
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (18)
  • [9] Principles for urban nature-based solutions
    Kabisch, Nadja
    Frantzeskaki, Niki
    Hansen, Rieke
    AMBIO, 2022, 51 (06) : 1388 - 1401
  • [10] Principles for urban nature-based solutions
    Nadja Kabisch
    Niki Frantzeskaki
    Rieke Hansen
    Ambio, 2022, 51 : 1388 - 1401