In vitro validation concept for lyophilized fecal microbiota products with a focus on bacterial viability

被引:0
|
作者
Sedeek, Sara A. [1 ,2 ]
Farowski, Fedja [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Youssafi, Stella [3 ]
Tsakmaklis, Anastasia [3 ,4 ]
Brodesser, Susanne [5 ]
El-Attar, Madiha M. [2 ]
Abdelmalek, Mohamed Omar [2 ]
Vehreschild, Maria J. G. T. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Goethe Univ Frankfurt, Univ Hosp Frankfurt, Dept Internal Med 2, Infect Dis, Frankfurt, Germany
[2] Assiut Univ, Dept Trop Med & Gastroenterol, Assiut, Egypt
[3] Univ Cologne, Univ Hosp Cologne, Ctr Integrated Oncol Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldo, Fac Med,Dept Internal Med 1, Cologne, Germany
[4] German Ctr Infect Res DZIF, Partner Site Bonn Cologne, Cologne, Germany
[5] Univ Cologne, Univ Hosp Cologne, Cluster Excellence Cellular Stress Responses Aging, Fac Med, Cologne, Germany
来源
关键词
Bacterial viability; Capsules; Clostridioides difficile; Fecal microbiota transplantation; Lyophilization; CLOSTRIDIUM-DIFFICILE INFECTION; TRANSPLANTATION; RESOLUTION; FROZEN; FRESH;
D O I
10.1007/s11274-025-04291-0
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) effectively treats recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI), typically administered as a fresh or frozen stool suspension through colonoscopy, nasojejunal tube, or oral capsules. Lyophilized fecal microbiota (LFM) are an alternative to frozen FM products. We aimed to assess whether lyophilization affects bacterial viability and metabolite levels and to develop LFM capsules for clinical use in Germany. Fecal donations from pre-screened volunteers were aliquoted and analyzed through microbial cell counting, bacterial culture, 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing, and bile acid assays. Results showed higher counts of viable bacterial cells and cultured anaerobes in unprocessed stool compared to freshly processed stool (p = 0.012 and p < 0.001, respectively). No significant difference in viable bacterial counts was found between freshly processed (day 0), lyophilized (day 3) and frozen FM (day 3) (p = 0.15), nor between freshly processed (day 0), lyophilized (days 30 and 90) and frozen FM (day 30) (p = 0.07). lyophilization did not significantly impact bile acid and 16S rRNA profiling. Encapsulation of lyophilized powder required fewer capsules (10-14) than frozen capsules (30). LFM products are a practical, viable alternative to frozen and fresh FM products, potentially improving storage and patient acceptance.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] Twelve Week Storage Trial of Microbial Viability in Lyophilized and Frozen Fecal Microbiota Preparations
    Lin, Enmoore
    Jaworski, Anthony
    Furnari, Vanessa
    Wong, Connie
    Bull, Michelle
    Chapman, Belinda
    Borody, Thomas J.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2015, 148 (04) : S962 - S962
  • [2] Evaluating the effect of lyoprotectants in preserving community structure and bacterial viability in the lyophilized fecal community of pigs
    Oladele, Paul
    Johnson, Timothy A.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2024, 102 : 511 - 511
  • [3] Evaluating the effect of lyoprotectants in preserving community structure and bacterial viability in the lyophilized fecal community of pigs
    Oladele, Paul
    Johnson, Timothy A.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2024, 102 : 511 - 511
  • [4] Assessment of fecal bacterial viability and diversity in fresh and frozen fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) product in horses
    Long, Alicia E.
    Pitta, Dipti
    Hennessy, Meagan
    Indugu, Nagaraju
    Vecchiarelli, Bonnie
    Luethy, Daniela
    Aceto, Helen
    Hurcombe, Samuel
    BMC VETERINARY RESEARCH, 2024, 20 (01)
  • [5] In vitro alterations of intestinal bacterial microbiota in fecal samples during storage
    Ott, SJ
    Musfeldt, M
    Timmis, KN
    Hampe, J
    Wenderoth, DF
    Schreiber, S
    DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2004, 50 (04) : 237 - 245
  • [6] Evaluation of Bacterial Viability for Fecal Microbiota Transplantation: Impact of Thawing Temperature and Storage Time
    Bottino, Paolo
    Vay, Daria
    Leli, Christian
    Ferrara, Lidia
    Pizzo, Valentina
    Gotta, Franca
    Raiteri, Alessio
    Rapallo, Fabio
    Roveta, Annalisa
    Maconi, Antonio
    Rocchetti, Andrea
    MICROORGANISMS, 2024, 12 (07)
  • [7] Long-Term Bacterial and Fungal Dynamics following Oral Lyophilized Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Clostridioides difficile Infection
    Haifer, Craig
    Paramsothy, Sudarshan
    Borody, Thomas J.
    Clancy, Annabel
    Leong, Rupert W.
    Kaakoush, Nadeem O.
    MSYSTEMS, 2021, 6 (01)
  • [8] FECAL MICROBIOTA TRANSPLANTATION FORMULATION DO NOT AFFECT BACTERIAL VIABILITY OR TREATMENT OUTCOMES IN RECURRENT C DIFFICILE INFECTION
    Chan, Leona
    McDougall, Chelsea
    Franz, Rose
    Wong, Karen
    Kao, Dina H.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2024, 166 (05) : S1171 - S1171
  • [9] Structure, viability and bacterial kinetics of an in vitro biofilm model using six bacteria from the subgingival microbiota
    Sanchez, M. C.
    Llama-Palacios, A.
    Blanc, V.
    Leon, R.
    Herrera, D.
    Sanz, M.
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTAL RESEARCH, 2011, 46 (02) : 252 - 260
  • [10] Evaluating Bacterial Viability in Faecal Microbiota Transplantation: A Comparative Analysis of In Vitro Cultivation and Membrane Integrity Methods
    Cibulkova, Ivana
    Rehorova, Veronika
    Wilhelm, Marek
    Soukupova, Hana
    Hajer, Jan
    Duska, Frantisek
    Dankova, Helena
    Cahova, Monika
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL LABORATORY ANALYSIS, 2024, 38 (19-20)