共 50 条
Investigating the Results of One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass After Primary Metabolic and Bariatric Restrictive Procedures
被引:0
|作者:
Shahmiri, Shahab Shahabi
[1
,3
]
Esparham, Ali
[2
]
Sedaghat, Hossein Khadem
[1
]
Safari, Shiva
[4
]
Daryabari, Seyed Nooredin
[4
,5
]
Pazouki, Abdolreza
[1
,3
]
Kermansaravi, Mohammad
[1
,3
]
机构:
[1] Iran Univ Med Sci, Hazrat E Fatemeh Hosp, Div Minimally Invas & Bariatr Surg, Dept Surg,Minimally Invas Surg Res Ctr,Sch Sci, Tehran, Iran
[2] Mashhad Univ Med Sci, Mashhad, Iran
[3] Hazrat Rasool Hosp, European Branch Int Federat Surg Obes, Ctr Excellence, Tehran, Iran
[4] Iran Univ Med Sci, Minimally Invas Surg Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
[5] Iran Univ Med Sci, Firoozgar Univ Affiliated Hosp, Dept Surg, Sch Med,Div Minimally Invas & Bariatr Surg, Tehran, Iran
关键词:
One anastomosis gastric bypass;
Conversion;
Sleeve gastrectomy;
Gastric banding;
Gastric Plication;
Recurrent weight gain;
SURGERY;
EXPERIENCE;
OUTCOMES;
D O I:
10.1007/s11695-024-07628-0
中图分类号:
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号:
摘要:
BackgroundPrevious studies showed a high conversion rate and failure of restrictive procedures, including sleeve gastrectomy (SG), adjustable gastric banding (AGB), gastric plication (GP), and vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG) in a long-term follow-up. The current study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a revisional one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) for weight loss and treatment of obesity-related problems after primary metabolic and bariatric restrictive procedures.MethodsA retrospective study on prospectively collected data was conducted on a sample of 151 patients who experienced insufficient weight loss or weight regain after primary restrictive surgeries and underwent OAGB as a revisional procedure.ResultsA total of 151 patients with a history of previous restrictive metabolic and bariatric surgery who underwent a revisional OAGB were included in this study. The restrictive procedures consisted of SG (n = 79), AGB (n = 45), GP (n = 15), and VBG (n = 12). Total weight loss percent (%TWL) after the revisional OAGB was 27.03 +/- 9.12, 27.74 +/- 10.05, 24.62 +/- 9.87, and 24.34 +/- 8.05 after 12, 24, 60, and 84 months, respectively. After 24 months of follow-up, TWL was significantly higher in the GP group compared to the AGB group. However, weight loss outcomes were not significantly different after 60 months of follow-up. The revisional OAGB was associated with a significant resolution of obesity-related problems, including type 2 diabetes (55.55%), hypertension (50%), dyslipidemia (77%), and obstructive sleep apnea (100%) after 2 years of follow-up. There was no serious complication after the revisional OAGB in the short- and long-term follow-up.ConclusionOAGB is an efficient and safe option as a conversion surgery after restrictive procedures.
引用
收藏
页码:525 / 534
页数:10
相关论文