Construction and interpretation of machine learning-based prognostic models for survival prediction among intestinal-type and diffuse-type gastric cancer patients

被引:1
|
作者
Ji, Kunxiang [1 ]
Shi, Lei [1 ]
Feng, Yan [1 ]
Wang, Linna [1 ]
Guo, HuanNan [1 ]
Li, Hui [1 ]
Xing, Jiacheng [1 ]
Xia, Siyu [1 ]
Xu, Boran [2 ]
Liu, Eryu [2 ]
Zheng, YanDan [3 ]
Li, Chunfeng [4 ]
Liu, Mingyang [1 ]
机构
[1] Beidahuang Ind Grp Gen Hosp, Dept Oncology 4, Harbin, Peoples R China
[2] Beidahuang Ind Grp Gen Hosp, Dept Oncology 3, Harbin, Peoples R China
[3] Anda City Hosp, Dept Oncol, Anda, Peoples R China
[4] Harbin Med Univ, Dept Gastrointestinal Surg, Canc Hosp, Harbin, Peoples R China
关键词
Gastric cancer; Intestinal-type; Diffuse-type; Prognosis; Machine learning; RISK;
D O I
10.1186/s12957-024-03550-y
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Gastric cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors worldwide, with high incidence and mortality rates, and it has a complex etiology and complex pathological features. Depending on the tumor type, gastric cancer can be classified as intestinal-type and diffuse-type gastric cancer, each with distinct pathogenic mechanisms and clinical presentations. In recent years, machine learning techniques have been widely applied in the medical field, offering new perspectives for the diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of gastric cancer patients. Methods This study recruited 2158 gastric cancer patients and constructed prognostic prediction models for both intestinal-type and diffuse-type gastric cancer. Clinical pathological data were collected from patients, and machine learning algorithms were used for feature selection and model construction. The performance of the models was validated with training and testing datasets. The Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) values were used to interpret the model predictions and identify the main factors that influence patient survival. Results In the prognostic model for intestinal-type gastric cancer, the gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT) model demonstrated the best performance, with key features including pTNM, CA125, tumor size, CA199, and PALB. Similarly, in the prognostic model for diffuse-type gastric cancer, the GBDT model was utilized, with key features comprising pTNM, Borrmann type IV disease, lymphocyte (LYM), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), potassium (K), perineural invasion (PNI), tumor size, and whole stomach location. Risk stratification analysis revealed that the prognosis of high-risk patients was significantly worse than that of low-risk patients. Conclusion Machine learning shows great potential in predicting survival outcomes of gastric cancer patients, providing strong support for the development of personalized treatment plans.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Differential expression of lipocortin 1 between intestinal-type and diffuse-type gastric cancer
    Sato, M
    Mizoi, T
    Shiiba, K
    Migita, T
    Matsuno, S
    3RD INTERNATIONAL GASTRIC CANCER CONGRESS, 1999, : 395 - 398
  • [2] Multilevel proteomic analyses reveal molecular diversity between diffuse-type and intestinal-type gastric cancer
    Shi, Wenhao
    Wang, Yushen
    Xu, Chen
    Li, Yan
    Ge, Sai
    Bai, Bin
    Zhang, Kecheng
    Wang, Yunzhi
    Zheng, Nairen
    Wang, Juan
    Wang, Shiqi
    Ji, Gang
    Li, Jipeng
    Nie, Yongzhan
    Liang, Wenquan
    Wu, Xiaosong
    Cui, Jianxin
    Wang, Yi
    Chen, Lin
    Zhao, Qingchuan
    Shen, Lin
    He, Fuchu
    Qin, Jun
    Ding, Chen
    NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2023, 14 (01)
  • [3] Multilevel proteomic analyses reveal molecular diversity between diffuse-type and intestinal-type gastric cancer
    Wenhao Shi
    Yushen Wang
    Chen Xu
    Yan Li
    Sai Ge
    Bin Bai
    Kecheng Zhang
    Yunzhi Wang
    Nairen Zheng
    Juan Wang
    Shiqi Wang
    Gang Ji
    Jipeng Li
    Yongzhan Nie
    Wenquan Liang
    Xiaosong Wu
    Jianxin Cui
    Yi Wang
    Lin Chen
    Qingchuan Zhao
    Lin Shen
    Fuchu He
    Jun Qin
    Chen Ding
    Nature Communications, 14
  • [4] Genetic classification of intestinal-type and diffuse-type gastric cancers based on chromosomal loss and microsatellite instability
    Kyoung-Mee Kim
    Mee-Sun Kwon
    Seung-Jin Hong
    Ki-Oak Min
    Eun-Joo Seo
    Kyo-Young Lee
    Sang-Wook Choi
    Mun-Gan Rhyu
    Virchows Archiv, 2003, 443 : 491 - 500
  • [5] Construction and validation of the prognostic nomogram model for patients with diffuse-type gastric cancer based on the SEER database
    Huang, Ting
    Chan, Chuiping
    Zhou, Heran
    Hu, Keke
    Wang, Lu
    Ye, Zhifeng
    DISCOVER ONCOLOGY, 2024, 15 (01)
  • [6] Genetic classification of intestinal-type and diffuse-type gastric cancers based on chromosomal loss and microsatellite instability
    Kim, KM
    Kwon, MS
    Hong, SJ
    Min, KO
    Seo, EJ
    Lee, KY
    Choi, SW
    Rhyu, MG
    VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2003, 443 (04) : 491 - 500
  • [7] Different clinical significance of FGFR1–4 expression between diffuse-type and intestinal-type gastric cancer
    Mikito Inokuchi
    Hideaki Murase
    Sho Otsuki
    Tatsuyuki Kawano
    Kazuyuki Kojima
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology, 15
  • [8] Different clinical significance of FGFR1-4 expression between diffuse-type and intestinal-type gastric cancer
    Inokuchi, Mikito
    Murase, Hideaki
    Otsuki, Sho
    Kawano, Tatsuyuki
    Kojima, Kazuyuki
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 15
  • [9] The differences in microsatellite instability between diffuse-type and intestinal-type gastric cancer from a high-risk population
    Choe, W
    Kim, J
    Lee, S
    Lee, J
    Kim, YH
    Son, H
    Rhee, PL
    Rhee, J
    Ki, C
    Jeon, H
    Kim, J
    Song, S
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2003, 124 (04) : A186 - A186
  • [10] Prediction models for the survival in patients with intestinal-type gastric adenocarcinoma: a retrospective cohort study based on the SEER database
    Hong, Jiawen
    Cheng, Yinfei
    Gu, Xiaodan
    Xu, Weibing
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (04):