Which questionnaires can be used to elicit patients' preferences regarding patient-provider consultations? Results of a scoping review

被引:0
|
作者
Bambas, Alina Zoe [1 ]
Wahidie, Diana [2 ]
Yilmaz-Aslan, Yuece [2 ]
Brzoska, Patrick [2 ]
Kiessling, Claudia [1 ]
机构
[1] Witten Herdecke Univ, Fac Hlth, Educ Personal & Interpersonal Competencies Hlth Ca, Alfred Herrhausen Str 50, D-58455 Witten, Germany
[2] Witten Herdecke Univ, Fac Hlth, Dept Hlth Serv Res, Witten, Germany
关键词
Patient preferences; Patient-provider consultation; Patient-centered care; Patient-provider communication; Shared decision making; Providing information; Scoping review; Questionnaires; SHARED DECISION-MAKING; CANCER-PATIENTS; PATIENTS WANT; PRIMARY-CARE; INFORMATION NEEDS; CENTERED CARE; HEALTH-CARE; COMMUNICATION; INVOLVEMENT; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1186/s12913-025-12567-2
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
ObjectiveActive patient involvement and attention to patient preferences in patient-provider consultations are increasingly recognized as essential to improve patient satisfaction and outcomes. Aim of the review was to provide an overview of questionnaires that measure patient preferences regarding communication, information provision and involvement in decision-making in patient-provider consultations.MethodsInclusion criteria were studies that provided primary data, were published in German or English, and included adult patients. The systematic search was conducted in PubMed and PsycInfo. Data extraction and summary focused on information about the development process, topic and structure, and reliability of instruments.ResultsOf 6,667 abstracts screened, 34 articles were included, describing 37 different instruments, often originating from an Anglo-American context. Twelve articles reported patient involvement in the development process. Majority of questionnaires measures aspects of information and/or decision-making preferences. Fewer instruments focus on patient-centeredness or communication preferences. Length of questionnaires varied from one to 80 items. Only 15 studies reported reliability indices.ConclusionDue to the heterogeneous description, a more consistent reporting of data would be desirable for future publications as well as more participatory research.Practice implicationsAlthough there is a wide range of questionnaires available, more research is needed to determine the extent to which they can be used in everyday clinical practice to elicit preferences from individual patients with a wide range of conditions and cultural backgrounds.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 2 条
  • [1] Patient-provider communication during consultations for elective dental procedures: A scoping review
    Pilgrim, Codey
    Catunda, Raisa
    Major, Paul
    Perez-Garcia, Arnaldo
    Flores-Mir, Carlos
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2024, 166 (05)
  • [2] A landscape review to identify what matters to patients with thrombotic cardiovascular diseases and patient-reported outcome instruments which can be used to capture the patient experience
    Barsdorf, Alexandra I.
    Fastenau, John
    Lee, Shannon
    Li, Xiaoyan
    O'Brien, Ellen
    Stevenson, Blue
    Becker, Brandon
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2025, 34 (01) : 101 - 111