A scoping review of factors influencing the implementation of liquid biopsy for cancer care

被引:1
|
作者
Sheriff, Samran [1 ]
Saba, Maree [1 ]
Patel, Romika [1 ]
Fisher, Georgia [1 ]
Schroeder, Tanja [1 ]
Arnolda, Gaston [1 ]
Luo, Dan [2 ]
Warburton, Lydia [3 ,4 ]
Gray, Elin [3 ,5 ]
Long, Georgina [6 ,7 ,8 ,9 ]
Braithwaite, Jeffrey [1 ]
Rizos, Helen [6 ,10 ]
Ellis, Louise Ann [1 ]
机构
[1] Macquarie Univ, Australian Inst Hlth Innovat, Ctr Healthcare Resilience & Implementat Sci, Level 6,75 Talavera Rd, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Daffodil Ctr, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Edith Cowan Univ, Ctr Precis Hlth, Joondalup, WA, Australia
[4] Fiona Stanley Hosp, Dept Med Oncol, Murdoch, WA, Australia
[5] Edith Cowan Univ, Sch Med & Hlth Sci, Joondalup, WA, Australia
[6] Univ Sydney, Melanoma Inst Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[7] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[8] Univ Sydney, Charles Perkins Ctr, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[9] Royal North Shore & Mater Hosp, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[10] Macquarie Univ, Fac Med Hlth & Human Sci, Macquarie Med Sch, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
Liquid biopsy; Cancer care; Barriers; Facilitators; Implementation; Personalised medicine; CtDNA; CfDNA; CTC; CIRCULATING TUMOR DNA; CLINICAL-APPLICATION; BIOMARKER; HETEROGENEITY; VALIDATION; DISCOVERY; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1186/s13046-025-03322-w
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BackgroundLiquid biopsy (LB) offers a promising, minimally invasive alternative to traditional tissue biopsies in cancer care, enabling real-time monitoring and personalized treatment. Despite its potential, the routine implementation of LB in clinical practice faces significant challenges. This scoping review examines the barriers and facilitators influencing the implementation of liquid biopsies into standard cancer care.MethodsFour academic databases (PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science) were systematically searched without language restrictions. We included peer-reviewed articles that were published between January 2019 and March 2024 that focused on the implementation of LB in cancer care or described barriers and facilitators to its implementation. Data relevant to the review objective, including key article characteristics; barriers and facilitators of implementation; and recommendations for advancement or optimisation; were extracted and analysed using thematic and visual network analyses.ResultsThe majority of the included articles were narrative review articles (84%), with most from China (24.2%) and the United States (20%). Thematic analysis identified four main categories and their associated barriers and facilitators to the implementation of LB in cancer care: (1) Laboratory and personnel requirements; (2) Disease specificity; (3) Biomarker-based liquid biopsy; and (4) Policy and regulation. The majority of barriers identified were concentrated in the pre-analytical phase, highlighting the lack of standardization in LB technologies and outcomes.ConclusionsThrough a thematic analysis of the barriers and facilitators to LB implementation, we present an integrated tool designed to encourage the standardization of testing methods for clinical practice guidelines in the field.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A myriad of factors influencing the implementation of transitional care innovations: a scoping review
    Fakha, Amal
    Groenvynck, Lindsay
    de Boer, Bram
    van Achterberg, Theo
    Hamers, Jan
    Verbeek, Hilde
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2021, 16 (01)
  • [2] A myriad of factors influencing the implementation of transitional care innovations: a scoping review
    Amal Fakha
    Lindsay Groenvynck
    Bram de Boer
    Theo van Achterberg
    Jan Hamers
    Hilde Verbeek
    Implementation Science, 16
  • [3] Factors influencing the engagement of cancer patients with advance care planning: A scoping review
    Spelten, Evelien R.
    Geerse, Olaf
    van Vuuren, Julia
    Timmis, Jennifer
    Blanch, Bev
    Duijts, Saskia
    MacDermott, Sean
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 2019, 28 (03)
  • [4] Factors Influencing the Implementation of Nutrition Policies in Schools: A Scoping Review
    McIsaac, Jessie-Lee D.
    Spencer, Rebecca
    Chiasson, Kaleigh
    Kontak, Julia
    Kirk, Sara F. L.
    HEALTH EDUCATION & BEHAVIOR, 2019, 46 (02) : 224 - 250
  • [5] Examining structural factors influencing cancer care experienced by Inuit in Canada: a scoping review
    Huang, Wen Qiu
    Gifford, Wendy
    Phillips, J. Craig
    Coburn, Veldon
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CIRCUMPOLAR HEALTH, 2023, 82 (01)
  • [6] The Influencing Factors of Implementation in Emergency Medical Service Systems - A Scoping Review
    Chiu, Yu-Chen
    Liu, Cheng-Heng
    Chiu, Yen-Lin
    Wang, Liang-Wei
    Chen, Huey-Ling
    Yang, Chih-Wei
    PREHOSPITAL EMERGENCY CARE, 2024,
  • [7] Factors influencing the reimbursement of cancer drugs in Europe: A scoping review
    Nieto-Gomez, Pelayo
    Castano-Amores, Celia
    JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2024, 30 (08) : 1546 - 1555
  • [8] Factors that influence the implementation of innovation in aged care: a scoping review
    Windle, Alice
    Marshall, Amy
    de la Perrelle, Lenore
    Champion, Stephanie
    Ross, Paul D. S.
    Harvey, Gillian
    Davy, Carol
    JBI EVIDENCE IMPLEMENTATION, 2024, 22 (01): : 61 - 80
  • [9] Factors Influencing the Care and Management of Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Scoping Review
    Ojo, Omorogieva
    Boateng, Joshua
    Pacella, Rosana
    Hanrahan, Ann
    Essex, Ryan
    Dibley, Lesley
    ENDOCRINE PRACTICE, 2025, 31 (03) : 380 - 389
  • [10] Factors influencing communication about frailty in primary care: A scoping review
    Lawless, Michael T.
    Archibald, Mandy M.
    Ambagtsheer, Rachel C.
    Kitson, Alison L.
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2020, 103 (03) : 436 - 450