Neonatal and maternal dietary interventions driving microbiota and functionality in piglet gut compartments

被引:0
|
作者
Schokker, Dirkjan [1 ,3 ]
van den Esker, Marielle H. [1 ]
Bossers, Alex [1 ]
Allaart, Janneke G. [1 ]
van Hees, Hubert [2 ]
de Greeff, Astrid [1 ]
Rebel, Johanna M. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen Biovet Res, Lelystad, Netherlands
[2] Trouw Nutr Res & Dev, Boxmeer, Netherlands
[3] Postbus 338, NL-6700 AH Wageningen, Netherlands
来源
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS | 2025年 / 15卷 / 01期
关键词
Gut functionality; Gut development; Pigs; Dietary intervention; Microbiota; Intestinal gene expression; CHAIN FATTY-ACIDS; BETA-GLUCANS; IMMUNE; SUPPLEMENTATION; ABSORPTION; MORPHOLOGY; NUTRITION; TRACT;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-025-90781-y
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Feed additives aiming to improve gastrointestinal health are frequently supplied to piglets after weaning (d28) but might be more effective when administered before weaning. In this period, feed additives can either be administered directly to neonates, or indirectly via sow's feed. It is yet unknown what the effect of the administration route is on gut functionality and health in the piglets. Therefore, we compared the effect of different dietary interventions on gut functionality after maternal administration (lactation feed) to the neonatal administration route (oral gavage). These feed interventions included medium chain fatty acids (MCFA), beta-glucans (BG), and galacto-oligosaccharides (GOS). For the maternal administration route, MCFA showed a significant difference in alpha diversity parameter, observed species at d1 and one differentially expressed gene (DEG), and 99 DEG at d31. Pathway enrichment analysis showed association to immune processes and metabolism. For BG, only 21 DEG were observed at d31, these DEGs were associated to signal transduction and sympathetic nerve pathway. For GOS, 816 DEG were observed for GOS at d1, and 77 at d31, where DEGs at d1 were associated to immune processes. For the neonatal administration route, MCFA showed 94 DEG and GOS 6 DEG. Where DEGs in MCFA were mainly associated to cell adhesion processes. When comparing the administration routes directly between treatment groups, we observed significant differences in alpha diversity parameters, observed species at d31 for MCFA, Shannon for GOS, as well as for beta diversity in GOS. For MCFA 515 DEG were observed, for BG 503 DEG, and for GOS 996 DEG. Where for MCFA most pathways were associated to immunological processes, BG showed more metabolism, and GOS mainly metabolism with a few immunological processes. The type of intervention and the administration route influence gut functionality of the piglets. MCFA administration led to a more differentially orchestrated response when comparing the neonatal and maternal administration route then the other two additives. This implies that for each nutritional intervention in early life of a pig the optimal route of administration needs to be determined.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Causality in dietary interventions—building a case for gut microbiota
    Yan Y. Lam
    Chenhong Zhang
    Liping Zhao
    Genome Medicine, 10
  • [2] DIETARY INTERVENTIONS ON GUT MICROBIOTA IN RELATION TO OBESITY: REVIEW
    Gkitsa, A.
    ATHEROSCLEROSIS, 2020, 315 : E185 - E185
  • [3] The Role of the Gut Microbiota in Dietary Interventions for Depression and Anxiety
    Bear, Tracey L. K.
    Dalziel, Julie E.
    Coad, Jane
    Roy, Nicole C.
    Butts, Christine A.
    Gopal, Pramod K.
    ADVANCES IN NUTRITION, 2020, 11 (04) : 890 - 907
  • [4] Localization of Gut Microbiota Along Longitudinal and Radial Axes in the Healthy Neonatal Piglet
    Lennon, Dylan
    Liu, Lin
    Allen, Hannah
    Lukosaityte, Jurate
    Zhao, Lisa
    Li, Eric
    Wang, Gary
    Borum, Peggy
    FASEB JOURNAL, 2015, 29
  • [5] Interindividual variability in gut microbiota and host response to dietary interventions
    Healey, Genelle R.
    Murphy, Rinki
    Brough, Louise
    Butts, Christine A.
    Coad, Jane
    NUTRITION REVIEWS, 2017, 75 (12) : 1059 - 1080
  • [6] Causality in dietary interventions-building a case for gut microbiota
    Lam, Yan Y.
    Zhang, Chenhong
    Zhao, Liping
    GENOME MEDICINE, 2018, 10
  • [7] Does the maternal vaginal microbiota play a role in seeding the microbiota of neonatal gut and nose?
    Sakwinska, O.
    Foata, F.
    Berger, B.
    Brussow, H.
    Combremont, S.
    Mercenier, A.
    Dogra, S.
    Soh, S. -E.
    Yen, J. C. K.
    Heong, G. Y. S.
    Lee, Y. S.
    Yap, F.
    Meaney, M. J.
    Chong, Y. -S.
    Godfrey, K. M.
    Holbrook, J. D.
    BENEFICIAL MICROBES, 2017, 8 (05) : 763 - 778
  • [8] Gut Microbiota Signatures Predict Host and Microbiota Responses to Dietary Interventions in Obese Individuals
    Korpela, Katri
    Flint, Harry J.
    Johnstone, Alexandra M.
    Lappi, Jenni
    Poutanen, Kaisa
    Dewulf, Evelyne
    Delzenne, Nathalie
    de Vos, Willem M.
    Salonen, Anne
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (03):
  • [9] Modulating the gut microbiota with dietary interventions to protect against cardiometabolic disease
    Fernandez-Ruiz, Irene
    NATURE REVIEWS CARDIOLOGY, 2021, 18 (05) : 305 - 305
  • [10] Modulating the gut microbiota with dietary interventions to protect against cardiometabolic disease
    Irene Fernández-Ruiz
    Nature Reviews Cardiology, 2021, 18 : 305 - 305