A randomized controlled trial of the outcomes of Arista™ hemostatic agent in robotic ventral hernia repair

被引:0
|
作者
Janowski, Courtney [1 ]
Nguyen, Tiffany [1 ]
da Silveira, Carlos Balthazar [2 ]
Gulati, Snigdha [2 ]
Deka, Vikram [1 ,2 ]
Ballecer, Conrad [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Creighton Univ, Sch Med Gen Surg Residency, Phoenix, AZ USA
[2] St Josephs Hosp, Dign Hlth, Phoenix, AZ 85013 USA
关键词
Ventral hernia; Incisional hernia; Seroma; Hematoma; RISK-FACTORS; SEROMA; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.1007/s11701-025-02252-1
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Ventral hernia repairs (VHR) are commonly performed surgical procedures in the United States, with over 300,000 cases treated annually. Robotic surgery has gained traction for its safety and efficacy in VHR, particularly with techniques such as myofascial release. However, the extensive dissection involved in these procedures may lead to postoperative complications like seromas and hematomas. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of Arista (TM), an FDA-approved hemostatic agent, in reducing these complications during robotic-assisted laparoscopic VHR involving mesh placement in the retrorectus space. This single-institution single-blind prospective randomized controlled trial involved 100 patients undergoing elective robotic-assisted laparoscopic VHR at a tertiary referral hernia center. Participants were randomized to receive either 5 g of Arista (TM) or standard of care intraoperatively, with no hemostat applied in the control group. All patients had drains placed in the retrorectus space. Primary outcomes included drain output on the first postoperative day (POD), total drain output, and duration of drain placement. Secondary outcomes included estimated blood loss (EBL), number of drains used, operative time, and length of stay (LOS). This study was funded by Becton, Dickinson and Company (BD). The mean total drain output was significantly higher in the Arista (TM) group (592.8 ml) compared to the control group (407.9 ml; p = 0.01), with a 39.6% increase noted. However, no significant difference in drain output on the first postoperative day or drain duration was observed. Secondary outcomes revealed no statistically significant differences in EBL, number of drains, operative time, or LOS between the groups. While the application of Arista (TM) during robotic-assisted laparoscopic VHR resulted in increased total drain output, it did not significantly affect other postoperative metrics, including LOS and complications. Further research is warranted to explore the potential benefits of Arista (TM) in specific patient populations and surgical contexts.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Open versus robotic retromuscular ventral hernia repair: outcomes of the ORREO prospective randomized controlled trial
    Warren, Jeremy A.
    Blackhurst, Dawn
    Ewing, Joseph A.
    Carbonell, Alfredo M.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2024, 38 (12): : 7466 - 7474
  • [2] Robotic versus open primary ventral hernia repair: A randomized controlled trial (Robovent Trial)
    Douissard, Jonathan
    Meyer, Jeremy
    Dupuis, Arnaud
    Peloso, Andrea
    Mareschal, Julie
    Toso, Christian
    Hagen, Monika
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY PROTOCOLS, 2020, 21 : 27 - 31
  • [3] Robotic versus laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: multicenter, blinded randomized controlled trial
    Olavarria, Oscar A.
    Bernardi, Karla
    Shah, Shinil K.
    Wilson, Todd D.
    Wei, Shuyan
    Pedroza, Claudia
    Avritscher, Elenir B.
    Loor, Michele M.
    Ko, Tien C.
    Kao, Lillian S.
    Liang, Mike K.
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 370
  • [4] Robotic versus open ventral hernia repair (ROVHR): a randomized controlled trial protocol
    Carvalho, Alvaro C.
    Woo, Kimberly P.
    Ellis, Ryan C.
    Tu, Chao
    Miller, Benjamin T.
    Prabhu, Ajita S.
    Rosen, Michael J.
    Krpata, David M.
    Petro, Clayton C.
    Beffa, Lucas R.
    HERNIA, 2025, 29 (01)
  • [5] Robotic Ventral Hernia Repair: Indications and Outcomes
    Aghayeva, Afag
    Neiman, Pooja
    Kudsi, Omar Yusef
    CURRENT SURGERY REPORTS, 2024, 12 (11): : 395 - 407
  • [6] LAPAROSCOPIC VERSUS OPEN VENTRAL HERNIA REPAIR: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
    Pring, Chris M.
    Tran, Viet
    O'Rourke, Nick
    Martin, Ian J.
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2008, 78 (10) : 903 - 906
  • [7] Robotic Ventral Hernia Repair and Endoscopic Component Separation: Outcomes
    Oviedo, Rodolfo J.
    Robertson, Jarrod C.
    Desai, Apurva Sunder
    JSLS-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SURGEONS, 2017, 21 (03)
  • [8] An Evaluation of Robotic Ventral Hernia Repair
    Mudyanadzo, Tatenda Andrew
    Hunter, John Daniel, III
    Rider, Paul F.
    Richards, William O.
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2020, 86 (01) : E45 - E46
  • [9] ROBOTIC TAPP FOR VENTRAL HERNIA REPAIR
    Lodha, M.
    Sharma, N.
    Karthik, N.
    Abhijeet
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 111
  • [10] Clinical outcomes and cost of robotic ventral hernia repair: systematic review
    Ye, Linda
    Childers, Christopher P.
    de Virgilio, Michael
    Shenoy, Rivfka
    Mederos, Michael A.
    Mak, Selene S.
    Begashaw, Meron M.
    Booth, Marika S.
    Shekelle, Paul G.
    Wilson, Mark
    Gunnar, William
    Girgis, Mark D.
    Maggard-Gibbons, Melinda
    BJS OPEN, 2021, 5 (06):