Methodological considerations in calculating the minimal clinically important change score for the core outcome measures index (COMI): insights from a large single-centre spine surgery registry

被引:0
|
作者
Andrea Cina [1 ]
Jacopo Vitale [2 ]
Daniel Haschtmann [2 ]
Markus Loibl [3 ]
Tamas F. Fekete [3 ]
Frank Kleinstück [3 ]
Fabio Galbusera [3 ]
Catherine R. Jutzeler [2 ]
Anne F. Mannion [1 ]
机构
[1] ETH Zurich,Department of Health Sciences and Technology (D
[2] Schulthess Klinic,HEST)
[3] Schulthess Klinic,Department of Teaching, Research and Development
[4] Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics (SIB),Department of Spine Surgery and Neurosurgery
关键词
Minimal clinical important change; COMI; Spine; Surgery outcomes;
D O I
10.1007/s00586-024-08537-7
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
引用
收藏
页码:4415 / 4425
页数:10
相关论文
共 8 条
  • [1] Cross-cultural adaptation, validation and establishment of the minimal clinically important change score of the European Portuguese core outcome measures index in patients with lumbar degenerative spine disease
    Aguiar, Pedro Valente
    Silva, Pedro
    Lucas, Diana
    Vaz, Rui
    Pereira, Paulo
    Mannion, Anne F.
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2024, 33 (02) : 394 - 400
  • [2] Cross-cultural adaptation, validation and establishment of the minimal clinically important change score of the European Portuguese core outcome measures index in patients with lumbar degenerative spine disease
    Pedro Valente Aguiar
    Pedro Santos Silva
    Diana Lucas
    Rui Vaz
    Paulo Pereira
    Anne F. Mannion
    European Spine Journal, 2024, 33 : 394 - 400
  • [3] The quality of spine surgery from the patient’s perspective: Part 2. Minimal clinically important difference for improvement and deterioration as measured with the Core Outcome Measures Index
    A. F. Mannion
    F. Porchet
    F. S. Kleinstück
    F. Lattig
    D. Jeszenszky
    V. Bartanusz
    J. Dvorak
    D. Grob
    European Spine Journal, 2009, 18 : 374 - 379
  • [4] The quality of spine surgery from the patient's perspective: Part 2. Minimal clinically important difference for improvement and deterioration as measured with the Core Outcome Measures Index
    Mannion, A. F.
    Porchet, F.
    Kleinstueck, F. S.
    Lattig, F.
    Jeszenszky, D.
    Bartanusz, V.
    Dvorak, J.
    Grob, D.
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2009, 18 : S374 - S379
  • [5] Follow-up score, change score or percentage change score for determining clinical important outcome following surgery? An observational study from the Norwegian registry for Spine surgery evaluating patient reported outcome measures in lumbar spinal stenosis and lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis
    Ivar Magne Austevoll
    Rolf Gjestad
    Margreth Grotle
    Tore Solberg
    Jens Ivar Brox
    Erland Hermansen
    Frode Rekeland
    Kari Indrekvam
    Kjersti Storheim
    Christian Hellum
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 20
  • [6] Follow-up score, change score or percentage change score for determining clinical important outcome following surgery? An observational study from the Norwegian registry for Spine surgery evaluating patient reported outcome measures in lumbar spinal stenosis and lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis
    Austevoll, Ivar Magne
    Gjestad, Rolf
    Grotle, Margreth
    Solberg, Tore
    Brox, Jens Ivar
    Hermansen, Erland
    Rekeland, Frode
    Indrekvam, Kari
    Storheim, Kjersti
    Hellum, Christian
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2019, 20 (1)
  • [7] Cross-cultural adaptation, validation, and establishment of the minimal clinicallyimportant change score of the European Portuguese Core Outcome Measures Index in patients with cervical degenerative spine disease
    Pedro Valente Aguiar
    Paulo Pereira
    Anne F. Mannion
    Pedro Santos Silva
    European Spine Journal, 2025, 34 (1) : 36 - 42
  • [8] Routine use of glycoprotein Ilb/IIIa inhibitor therapy is associated with an improved in-hospital outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention: Insights from a large, prospective, single-centre registry
    Jackevicius, CA
    Pinto, R
    Daly, P
    Mackie, K
    Dzavik, V
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2005, 21 (01) : 27 - 32