Evaluating the Accuracy of Machine Learning, Deep Learning and Hybrid Algorithms for Flood Routing Calculations

被引:1
|
作者
Sarigol, Metin [1 ]
机构
[1] Erzincan Binali Yildirim Univ, Erzincan Uzumlu Vocat Sch, Design Dept, Erzincan, Turkiye
关键词
Deep learning; Machine learning; Neural networks; Flood routing prediction; Hybrid machine learning; NEURAL-NETWORK; MODELS;
D O I
10.1007/s00024-024-03575-0
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
The increase in average temperatures in the last century has caused global warming, which has increased the frequency of natural disasters. Floods are one of the most important natural disasters and harm the environment and especially human life. Flood routing techniques also play an important role in predicting floods. For this reason, the accuracy and precision of flood routing calculations are of vital importance in taking all necessary precautions before the floods reach the region and in preventing loss of life. This study aims to compare the performance of machine learning, deep learning and hybrid algorithms for flood routing prediction models in the B & uuml;y & uuml;k Menderes River. In this research deep learning model Long-Short Term Memory (LSTM), machine learning model Artificial Neural Network (ANN), and hybrid machine learning models empirical mode decomposition (EMD)-ANN, and particle swarm optimization (PSO)-ANN algorithms were compared to forecast the flood routing results in two discharge observation stations in the B & uuml;y & uuml;k Menderes river. The analysis results of the established ML algorithms were compared with statistical criteria such as mean error, mean absolute error, root mean square error and coefficient of determination. Additionally, Taylor diagrams, box plots, and beeswarm plot visual graphs were also used in this comparison analysis. At the end of the research, it was determined that the hybrid algorithm PSO-ANN was the most successful algorithm in forecasting flood routing results among other models according to the error values of MAE: 0.2514, MSE: 0.4613, RMSE: 0.6791, NSE: 0.941 and MBE: 0.047. Moreover, the LSTM algorithm was the approach with second estimation accuracy. The findings are vital in terms of taking necessary precautions and gaining time before floods reach any region.
引用
收藏
页码:3485 / 3506
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Can deep learning algorithms outperform benchmark machine learning algorithms in flood susceptibility modeling?
    Binh Thai Pham
    Chinh Luu
    Tran Van Phong
    Phan Trong Trinh
    Shirzadi, Ataollah
    Renoud, Somayeh
    Asadi, Shahrokh
    Hiep Van Le
    von Meding, Jason
    Clague, John J.
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2021, 592
  • [2] Evaluating Impact of Race in Facial Recognition across Machine Learning and Deep Learning Algorithms
    Coe, James
    Atay, Mustafa
    COMPUTERS, 2021, 10 (09)
  • [3] Riverine flood potential assessment using metaheuristic hybrid machine learning algorithms
    Vojtek, Matej
    Janizadeh, Saeid
    Vojtekova, Jana
    JOURNAL OF FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT, 2023, 16 (03):
  • [4] Evaluating urban flood risk using hybrid method of TOPSIS and machine learning
    Rafiei-Sardooi, Elham
    Azareh, Ali
    Choubin, Bahram
    Mosavi, Amir H.
    Clague, John J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION, 2021, 66
  • [5] Evaluating the Accuracy of Machine Learning Algorithms on Detecting Code Smells for Different Developers
    Hozano, Mario
    Antunes, Nuno
    Fonseca, Baldoino
    Costa, Evandro
    ICEIS: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 19TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENTERPRISE INFORMATION SYSTEMS - VOL 2, 2017, : 474 - 482
  • [6] A Survey on Machine Learning Based Routing Algorithms
    Liu C.
    Xu M.
    Geng N.
    Zhang X.
    Jisuanji Yanjiu yu Fazhan/Computer Research and Development, 2020, 57 (04): : 671 - 687
  • [7] Ethical challenges of machine learning and deep learning algorithms
    Prabhu, Sanjay P.
    LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2019, 20 (05): : 621 - 622
  • [8] Review of Machine Learning Methods for River Flood Routing
    Li, Li
    Jun, Kyung Soo
    WATER, 2024, 16 (02)
  • [9] Using AUC and accuracy in evaluating learning algorithms
    Huang, J
    Ling, CX
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON KNOWLEDGE AND DATA ENGINEERING, 2005, 17 (03) : 299 - 310
  • [10] Learning hybrid algorithms for vehicle routing problems
    Caseau, Y
    Laburthe, F
    THEORY AND PRACTICE OF LOGIC PROGRAMMING, 2001, 1 : 779 - 806