Well group carbon dioxide injection for enhanced coalbed methane recovery and key parameter of the numerical simulation and application in deep coalbed methane

被引:0
|
作者
Ye J.-P. [1 ]
Zhang B. [1 ]
Han X.-T. [1 ]
Zhang C.-J. [2 ]
机构
[1] China United Coalbed Methane Corporation, Ltd., Beijing
[2] Key Laboratory of CBM Resources and Reservoir Process, Ministry of Education, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou
来源
关键词
Carbon dioxide; Deep coal seam; Numerical simulation; Qinshui Basin; Recovery;
D O I
10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2015.9033
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
CO2-ECBM technology in deep coal seam is that CO2 can replace more CH4 and be buried in a long-term because of its strong adsorption effect. Experimental analysis in northern Shizhuang shows that the CO2 adsorption capacity is two times of CH4. With desorption pressure decrease, CH4 has higher desorption speed than CO2 so that it can be displaced effectively. CO2 injection causes the change of the physical property of coal reservoir, mainly refers to permeability variation caused by matrix shrinkage and swelling during CO2 adsorption and desorption, and the permeability decreases at first and increases rapidly with the decrease of pressure. By applying the permeability change rule, the geological model and numerical model were established. The influences of CO2 injection quantity, frequency and injection mode on the yield, recovery ratio and CO2 burial of the well group or single well were analyzed. The simulation results show that the gas recovery increases after two years CO2 injection with the injection rules such as the injection rate of 10-15 tons per day, continuous injection for 90 days, closing well for 90 days. Field test indicates that the CO2 adsorption capacity of No.3 coal seam is 8 tons/day. The group well burial potential is about 12616 t. © 2016, China Coal Society. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 155
页数:6
相关论文
共 10 条
  • [1] Puri R., Yee D., Enhanced coalbed methane recovery, SPE 65th Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, pp. 193-202, (1990)
  • [2] van Bergen F., Pagnier H., Krzystolik., Field experiment of enhanced coalbed methane-CO<sub>2</sub> in the upper Silesian Basin of Poland, Environmental Geosciences, 13, 3, pp. 201-224, (2006)
  • [3] Shi J.Q., Durucan S., A numerical simulation study of the Allison Unit CO<sub>2</sub>-ECBM pilot: The impact of matrix shrinkage and swelling on ECBM production and CO<sub>2</sub> injectivity, Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies (GHGT7), 1, pp. 431-439, (2004)
  • [4] Stanton R., Flores R., Warwick P.D., Et al., Coalbed sequestration of carbon dioxide, 1st National Conference on Carbon Sequestration, (2001)
  • [5] Reeves S., Taillefert A., Pekot L., Et al., The Allison Unit CO<sub>2</sub>-ECBM pilot: A reservoir modeling study, (2003)
  • [6] Ye J., Feng S., Fan Z., Et al., Micro-pilot test for enhanced coalbed methane recovery by injecting carbon dioxide in south part of Qinshui Basin, Acta Petrolei Sinica, 28, 4, pp. 77-80, (2007)
  • [7] Ye J., Zhang B., Wang S., Test and evaluation on elevation of coalbed methane recovery ratio by injecting and burying CO<sub>2</sub> for 3# coal seam of north section of Shizhuang, Qingshui Basin, Shanxi, Chinese Academy of Engineering, 14, 2, pp. 38-44, (2012)
  • [8] Zhang B., Ye J., 3# coal seam injection and buried CO<sub>2</sub> improve coal-bed methane recovery pilot test in Qinshui Basin, Thirty-First Annual International Pittsburgh Coal Conference, (2014)
  • [9] Detournay E., Cheng A.H.D., Fundamental of poroelasticity, Comprehensive Rock Engineering, Vol. II, pp. 113-171, (1993)
  • [10] Wu S., Zhao W., Guo Y., Parametric correlation between expansion deformation of coal mass and adsorption thermodynamics, Journal of Northeastern University (Natural Science), 26, 7, pp. 683-686, (2005)